In vitro and in vivo pharmacodynamics of three novel antileishmanial lead series.

OBJECTIVES: Three new chemical series (bicyclic nitroimidazoles, aminopyrazoles and oxaboroles) were selected by Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative as potential new drug leads for leishmaniasis. Pharmacodynamics studies included both in vitro and in vivo efficacy, cross-resistance profiling against the current antileishmanial reference drugs and evaluation of their cidal activity potential.
METHODS: Efficacy against the reference laboratory strains of Leishmania infantum (MHOM/MA(BE)/67/ITMAP263) and L. donovani (MHOM/ET/67/L82) was evaluated in vitro on intracellular amastigotes and in vivo in the early curative hamster model. Cidal activity was assessed over a period of 15 days in an in vitro 'time-to-kill' assay. Cross-resistance was assessed in vitro on a panel of L. infantum strains with different degrees of resistance to either antimony, miltefosine or paromomycin.
RESULTS: All lead compounds showed potent and selective in vitro activity against the Leishmania strains tested and no cross-resistance could be demonstrated against any of the current antileishmanial drugs. Cidal activity was obtained in vitro for all series within 15 days of exposure with some differences noted between L. donovani and L. infantum. When evaluated in vivo, all lead compounds showed high efficacy and no adverse effects were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The new lead series were shown to have cidal pharmacodynamic activity. The absence of cross-resistance with any of the current antileishmanial drugs opens possibilities for combination treatment to reduce the likelihood of treatment failures and drug resistance.

Introduction

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a neglected tropical disease (NTD) caused by Leishmania infantum and L. donovani, and fatal if left untreated. The available treatments all have considerable drawbacks, such as toxicity, teratogenicity and decreasing efficacy as noted by increasingly frequent treatment failures and the occurrence of drug resistance (Croft et al., 2006). New drugs with higher efficacy and especially lower toxicity are needed to enable a continued fight against this disease. Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi) is a not-for-profit organization that focuses on lead discovery and development of new drugs against NTDs (Chatelain and Ioset, 2011, Gupta et al., 2015, Mowbray, 2017). A novel aminopyrazole lead series with promising antileishmanial potential was recently identified (Mowbray et al., 2015) as well as a bicyclic nitroimidazole and oxaborole series for which the structure activity/property relationship studies are still ongoing.

Regarding nitro-aromatic drugs in general, these are already widely used against several parasite protozoan infections, including giardiasis, trichomoniasis and amoebiasis (Raether and Hanel, 2003, Hemphill et al., 2006). Against kinetoplastids, nifurtimox and benznidazole are used for treatment of Chagas disease (Patterson and Wyllie, 2014), while a combination therapy based on eflornithine and nifurtimox shows good efficacy and lower toxicity in human African trypanosiomiasis (HAT) (Priotto et al., 2009). Fexinidazole is yet another example with activity in Chagas (Bahia et al., 2012), and VL (Wyllie et al., 2012). Two new bicyclic nitroimidazoles DNDI-VL-2098 (Mukkavilli et al., 2014) and DNDI-0690 showing promising activity against VL have progressed towards preclinical development (Petri e Silva et al., 2016). Initially identified for their antifungal potential (Rock et al., 2007), oxaboroles have been shown to be effective for the treatment of HAT (Nare et al., 2010, Wring et al., 2014). SCYX-7158 entered phase-II/III for HAT while DNDI-6148 more recently became a drug development candidate for VL. Aminopyrazoles are now in late lead optimization phase for leishmaniasis (Mowbray et al., 2015) and were previously explored for cancer treatment (Pevarello et al., 2004, Raju et al., 2011).

The aim of the present study was threefold: i) evaluate the in vitro and in vivo activity profile of the selected nitroimidazole, oxaborole and aminopyrazole lead compound(s) against a panel of visceral Leishmania strains, ii) assess potential cross-resistance with the current antileishmanial drugs and iii) characterize whether they have leishmanicidal potential.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The use of laboratory rodents was carried out in strict accordance to all mandatory guidelines (EU directives, including the Revised Directive, 2010/63/EU on the Protection of Animals used for Scientific Purposes that came into force on 01/01/2013, and the declaration of Helsinki in its latest version) and was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University of Antwerp, Belgium [UA-ECD 2011–77].

Animals

Female Swiss mice (15–20g) and female golden hamsters (80–100 g) were purchased from Janvier (Le Genest Saint Isle, France). Food for laboratory rodents (Carfil, Arendonk, Belgium) and drinking water were available ad libitum. The animals were kept in quarantine for at least 5 days before infection and were randomly allocated to the experimental units.

Test substances

Miltefosine (MIL), paromomycin (PMM) and potassium antimonyl tartrate (SbIII) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Diegem, Belgium); sodium stiboglucanate (SbV) was obtained from Calbiochem (EMD Millipore Corporation, MA, USA); amphotericin B (AmB, Fungizone®) was obtained from Bristol-Myers-Squib (Gilead Sciences, CA, USA). The lead compounds (Table S1) in the nitroimidazole, oxaborole and aminopyrazole chemical series were selected after a SAR analysis and provided by DNDi (Geneva, Switzerland). Stock solutions for the in vitro assays were prepared in PBS for MIL (20 mM) and Sb (5.12 mg/mL) and in demineralized water for PMM (20 mM). AmB stock solutions (5.4 mM) were freshly prepared in 5% dextrose. Stock solutions (20 mM) of the DNDi lead compounds were prepared in DMSO and stored at 4 °C until use. Stock solutions were further diluted in demineralized water, except for DNDI-6148 that was diluted in 0.25% methylcellulose in water. In the in vitro assays, the final in-test concentration of DMSO was <1%.

In vitro cytotoxicity assay on MRC-5 cells

MRC-5SV2 cells were cultured in MEM with Earl's salts-medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with L-glutamine, NaHC03 and 5% inactivated fetal bovine serum (iFCS, Life Technologies). For the cytotoxicity assay, the cells were seeded at a concentration of 15,000 cells/well and 4-fold compound dilutions were added with a highest in-test concentration of 200 μM. After 3 days incubation at 37 °C and 5% CO2, resazurin (Sigma Aldrich, Diegem, Belgium) was added for fluorescence reading (Tecan®, GENios) after another 4 h of incubation. Cell viability was compared to the untreated control wells and the cytotoxic concentration 50% (CC50) was calculated of each compound.

Intracellular amastigote susceptibility assay

To obtain primary peritoneal macrophages, Swiss mice were stimulated by intraperitoneal injection of 1 mL 2% starch in PBS 48h prior to cell collection. Animals were euthanized with a CO2 overdose and upon removal of the skin, 10 mL of RPMI-1640 (Life Technologies) was injected into the peritoneal cavity to collect the macrophages that were then seeded into 96-well plates at a final concentration of 30,000 cells/well in 100 μL of RPMI-1640 macrophage medium, supplemented with 5% iFCS, 2% penicillin/streptomycin and 1% L-glutamine (Life technologies). After 24h, the cells were infected with spleen-derived L. infantum (MHOM/MA/67/ITMAP263) or L. donovani (MHOM/ET/67/L82) amastigotes obtained from heavily infected donor hamsters. The amastigotes were purified using two centrifugation steps and diluted to obtain an infection ratio of 5:1 in RPMI-1640 cell culture medium. After incubation for 2h, compound dilutions were added. Drug activity was evaluated after a 96-h incubation period without washing of the cells and without renewal of the drugged culture medium. Cells were stained with Giemsa for microscopic evaluation of cellular amastigote burdens. Percentage reduction compared to the burdens in the infected non-treated control wells was used as a measure for drug activity.

Cross-resistance with current antileismanial drugs

An overview of the L. infantum strains with their origin and corresponding susceptibility profile to SbV, SbIII, MIL and PMM is presented in Table 1. Promastigotes were cultured at room temperature in HOMEM promastigote medium (Gibco®, Life technologies), supplemented with 10% FCS. Infection of macrophages was carried out with metacyclic promastigotes at 15:1 multiplicity of infection. Infected macrophages were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 and DNDi compound dilutions were added 24h later. Drug susceptibility was determined microscopically after 96-h incubation without washing of the cells and without renewal of the drug-supplemented culture medium.

Table 1

Origin and susceptibility profile of selected L. infantum strains for the evaluation of cross resistance.

L. infantum	Susceptibility profile				Country	Origin
	SbV	SbIII	MIL	PMM
ITMAP263	S	S	S	S	Malta	Reference lab strain
L3034	R	I	S	S	Paraguay	HIV-positive patient
LEM5695	S	S	S	S	France	Dog
LEM5159	S	S	R	S	France	HIV-positive patient, failure AmB
LEM3323 Cl4	R	R	S	S	France	HIV-positive patient, failure AmB
LEM3323 Cl4 PMM	R	R	S	R	France	Selected for PMM resistance
LEM3323 Cl4 MIL	R	R	R	S	France	Selected for MIL resistance

Resistant (R) and intermediately resistant (I) phenotypes are highlighted in bold.

Time-to-kill

The time to kill (TTK) assay was performed to evaluate the minimal exposure time needed for the selected compounds to eliminate all viable intracellular parasites (Maes et al., 2017). Briefly, macrophages were exposed to compound 24h after infection with ex vivo spleen-derived amastigotes of either L. infantum or L. donovani and the initial infection burdens were assessed 24h later. Drug exposure with the DNDi lead compounds and the reference drugs MIL, PMM, SbV and AMB was set at 5 × IC50. Every 3 days, the medium was replaced with fresh drug-supplemented medium to assure optimal cell viability and drug exposure during the 15-day post-infection follow-up period. TTK was evaluated every 24h until 360h post-treatment primarily by staining a 96-well plate with Giemsa to determine the residual intracellular amastigote burden and using a duplicate plate for the promastigote back-transformation assay to assess viability of residual stages. Briefly, infected macrophages were mechanically disrupted after replacing the medium with HOMEM and incubated for 3 weeks at room temperature allowing residual viable amastigotes to transform back into promastigotes (Hendrickx et al., 2015). TTK was defined as the time required to achieve >95% reduction in parasite burdens determined by Giemsa staining and absence of promastigote back transformation. For each time point, parasite burdens were compared with the non-treated culture running in parallel (Fig. S1).

In vivo efficacy in the early curative treatment scheme

Spleen-derived amastigotes (see above) were used for artificial infection of Syrian golden hamsters that were randomly allocated to experimental units of 5 animals each. Individual body weights were measured at the start of the experiment. The infection inoculum containing 2 × 107amastigotes/100 μl in was delivered by intracardial injection. The aminopyrazoles were formulated in 1% (w/v) methylcellulose (4000 cps) and 5% (v/v) Tween80 in water. Oxaboroles were prepared in ethanol (2% of total volume), followed by the addition of 1N NaOH (1.0 eq.) and finally diluted in 5% dextrose in water. Nitroimidazoles were formulated in 100% PEG400 and MIL was formulated in water. A vehicle control group was incorporated for each formulation type. All animals in each experimental unit were orally treated for 5 consecutive days starting at 21 days post-infection (dpi) (Fortin et al., 2012). The standard dose was 50 mg/kg s.i.d. or b.i.d. (dependent on the PK properties) to assure maximal exposure in the primary evaluation. Subsequently, a dose-titration was performed to determine the minimal effective dose. For close analogues in the series, the starting dose was not necessarily 50 mg/kg. Amastigote burdens in the target organs liver, spleen and bone-marrow were determined 10 days after end of treatment. The liver and spleen of individual animals were weighed and impression smears were stained with Giemsa for microscopic enumeration of the average number of amastigotes per cell by counting a minimum of 500 nuclei. The results are expressed as Leishman-Donovan Units (LDU) (Franchino et al., 1956). As the bone-marrow could not be weighed, amastigote burdens on the smears are not fully quantitative and percentage reduction should be interpreted accordingly.

Results

In vitro cytotoxicity and drug susceptibility

Bicyclic nitroimidazoles and aminopyrazoles showed potent and selective activity in the sub-micromolar range against both L. infantum and L. donovani while oxaboroles showed slightly higher IC50-values. Overall, all tested lead compounds (Table S1) except DNDI-5421 showed better activity and lower cytotoxicity than MIL (Table 2).

Table 2

Overview of the . Results are expressed as the mean IC50 (μM) ± standard error of mean (SEM) and are based on two independent replicates run in duplicate (n = 4).

Series	Compound	L. infantum	L. donovani	Cytotoxicity (MRC-5)
Reference	Miltefosine	3.50 ± 0.40	1.80 ± 0.40	38.5 ± 4.18
Nitroimidazoles	DNDI-0690	0.17 ± 0.02	0.16 ± 0.06	>200
	DNDI-VL-2098	0.22 ± 0.02	0.39 ± 0.07	>200
	DNDI-8219	0.60 ± 0.09	0.35 ± 0.03	>200
Aminopyrazoles	DNDI-1044	0.17 ± 0.02	0.26 ± 0.06	>200
	DNDI-8012	0.22 ± 0.02	0.39 ± 0.07	>200
Oxaboroles	DNDI-6148	0.63 ± 0.24	2.29 ± 0.42	>200
	DNDI-5421	1.76 ± 0.21	4.18 ± 0.14	30.4 ± 0.87

Cross-resistance with current anti-leishmanial drugs

The compounds were evaluated on a range of laboratory and field strains with different susceptibility profiles to the current drugs to gain additional information on their mode-of-action. The selected L. infantum strains were first evaluated against the current reference drugs (Table 3). DNDi lead compounds showed no shift in susceptibility against any of the strains indicating that there is no obvious cross-resistance with the reference drugs (Table 4).

Table 3

. Results are expressed as the mean IC50 (μM) ± standard error of mean (SEM) and are based on three independent experiments with biological duplicates (n = 6). R = resistant, S = susceptible, I = intermediate.

MEAN IC50	SBV (ΜG/ML EQ)	SBIII (ΜG/ML EQ)	MIL (ΜM)	PMM (ΜM)
L. infantum	MEAN ± SEM	MEAN ± SEM	MEAN ± SEM	MEAN ± SEM
ITMAP263	14 ± 2	5.5 ± 1.1	3.5 ± 0.9	95 ± 6
L3034	>77	7.3 ± 1.2	0.8 ± 0.3	15 ± 3
LEM5695	29 ± 4	1.2 ± 0.3	0.8 ± 0.3	39 ± 19
LEM5159	17 ± 3	2.1 ± 0.1	25 ± 3	85 ± 26
LEM3323 CL4	>77	>44	0.5 ± 0.1	61 ± 14
LEM3323 CL4 PMM	77 ± 1	29 ± 8	0.9 ± 0.3	203 ± 49
LEM3323 CL4 MIL	>77	>44	30 ± 6	49 ± 14

Resistant (R) and intermediately resistant (I) phenotypes are highlighted in bold.

Table 4

. Results are expressed as the mean IC50 (μM) ± standard error of mean (SEM) and are based on three independent experiments with biological duplicates (n = 6).

MEAN IC50	NITROIMIDAZOLES			AMINOPYRAZOLES		OXABOROLES
	DNDI-0690	DNDI-8219	DNDI-VL-2098	DNDI-1044	DNDI-8012	DNDI-6148	DNDI-5421
L. infantum	MEAN ± SEM	MEAN ± SEM	MEAN ± SEM	MEAN ± SEM	MEAN ± SEM	MEAN ± SEM	MEAN ± SEM
ITMAP263	0.33 ± 0.10	0.90 ± 0.50	0.40 ± 0.00	0.10 ± 0.04	0.09 ± 0.03	1.05 ± 0.29	1.03 ± 0.26
L3034	0.05 ± 0.04	0.80 ± 0.00	0.90 ± 0.40	0.02 ± 0.01	0.04 ± 0.01	0.27 ± 0.11	0.89 ± 0.25
LEM5695	0.01 ± 0.00	0.17 ± 0.08	0.21 ± 0.10	0.08 ± 0.08	0.01 ± 0.01	0.04 ± 0.03	0.02 ± 0.01
LEM5159	0.17 ± 0.07	2.10 ± 0.50	1.70 ± 0.70	0.07 ± 0.03	0.09 ± 0.03	0.38 ± 0.22	0.52 ± 0.31
LEM3323CL4	0.10 ± 0.07	2.20 ± 1.00	1.30 ± 0.20	0.14 ± 0.05	0.31 ± 0.15	0.27 ± 0.11	0.89 ± 0.25
LEM3323CL4 PMM	0.09 ± 0.02	2.10 ± 0.90	0.80 ± 0.50	0.30 ± 0.10	0.83 ± 0.22	0.69 ± 0.51	1.08 ± 0.31
LEM3323CL4 MIL	0.01 ± 0.01	0.80 ± 0.20	1.10 ± 0.00	0.04 ± 0.02	0.09 ± 0.05	0.03 ± 0.01	0.02 ± 0.01

To first monitor the evolution of infection and amastigote burdens over the 15-day culture time, infection ratios based on the average number of amastigotes per cell (100 cells counted) of the selected L. infantum and L. donovani strains were determined every 24 h (Fig. S1). The infection was stable over the total 15-day period with a peak after 144 h for both strains. All the compounds including the reference compounds reached a TTK within the 15 days of exposure (Table 5) with the aminopyrazoles being slower in fully eliminating intracellular L. donovani amastigotes. The nitroimidazoles cleared parasites faster as compared with the reference compounds. A short TTK was also observed for MIL but this was associated with high cytotoxicity after 96h of exposure. No cytotoxicity was noted with any of the DNDi lead compounds.

Table 5

Time-to-kill (TTK) defined in hours (h) for both . Results are expressed as the mean and standard error of mean (SEM), results are based on two independent experiments with biological duplicates (n = 4).

Series	Compound	Concentration 5*IC50 (μM)	L. infantum	L. donovani
			TTK (h)	TTK (h)
Reference drugs	MIL	20	72	96
	PMM	250	168	168
	SbV	77	288	288
	AmB	5	192	192
Nitroimidazoles	DNDI-0690	1	48	96
	DNDI-VL-2098	1	72	48
	DNDI-8219	3	144	96
Aminopyrazoles	DNDI-1044	1	192	>360
	DNDI-8012	1.5	120	>360
Oxaboroles	DNDI-6148	7a	240	nd
	DNDI-5421	15	168	240

nd: not done; a tested at about 10x IC50.

In vivo efficacy in the early curative hamster model

Dose-titrations were performed against L. infantum to determine the potency of each compound (Table 6). Overall, nitroimidazoles showed excellent (>90%) reduction of parasite load in the major target organs at a comparatively lower dose range than MIL. Aminopyrazoles and oxaboroles achieved reductions of organ burdens comparable to MIL. One compound of each lead series was subsequently selected for evaluation in the early curative model against L. donovani, fully confirming the excellent efficacy (Table 7).

Table 6

Percentage reduction of amastigote burdens in liver, spleen and bone-marrow after a 5-day oral treatment with DND. Results are expressed as percentage reduction and are based on one experiment with five animals per group. Treatment was given once a day (SID) or twice a day (BID).

L. Infantum		Dose	% Reduction	% Reduction	% Reduction
Series	Compound	mg/kg/day	Liver	Spleen	Bone-marrow
Reference	Miltefosine	40 SID	97.9	99.6	97.3
Nitroimidazoles	DNDI-0690	12.5 BID12.5 BIDa	96.499.5	97.599.4	96.596.8
		6.25 BID6.25 BIDa	92.691.0	86.391.6	86.773.3
		12.5 SID	65.8	69.7	51.6
	DNDI-VL 2098	50 SID	100	100	100
		25 SID	100	99.9	99.7
		12.5 SID	99.0	98.7	94.0
	DNDI-8219	25 BID25 BIDa	87.698.4	77.799.2	68.897.0
		12.5 BID	25.1	9.70	5.00
Aminopyrazoles	DNDI-1044	50 BID	97.1	98.6	78.2
		25 BID	99.8	99.7	98.5
		12.5 BID	96.5	94.7	49.8
	DNDI-8012	50 BID	99.0	99.8	93.8
		25 BID	93.7	92.5	62.5
		12.5 BID	80.8	43.0	32.6
Oxaboroles	DNDI-6148	50 BID	100	99.9	99.4
		25 BID	98.3	98.2	93.6
		12.5 BID	89.4	87.3	81.8
		50 SID	98.6	97.2	89.4
	DNDI-5421	50 BID	99.4	98.5	93.4
		25 BID	97.3	95.4	92.6

Repeat experiment using a different batch.

Table 7

Percentage reduction of amastigote burdens in liver, spleen and bone-marrow after a 5-day oral treatment with of the DND Results are expressed as percentage reduction and are based on one experiment with five animals per group. Treatment was given once a day (SID) or twice a day (BID).

L. donovani	In vivo effect	Dose	% Reduction	% Reduction	% Reduction
Series	Compound	mg/kg/day	Liver	Spleen	Bone-marrow
Reference	Miltefosine	40 SID	98.4	99.3	97.3
Nitroimidazole	DNDI-0690	25 BID	99.9	100	99.9
		12.5 BID	99.8	99.9	100
Aminopyrazole	DNDI-1044	50 BID	96.3	97.7	66.9
		25 BID	92.6	94.5	88.3
Oxaborole	DNDI-6148	50 BID	99.3	98.6	83.4
		25 BID	93.2	90.3	92.8

Discussion

None of the current VL treatments is ideal as most of them require long treatment and are not devoid of toxicity issues, such as cardiac arrhythmias for SbV (Croft and Yardley, 2002, Tiuman et al., 2011, Freitas-Junior et al., 2012), teratogenicity for MIL (Singh et al., 2016), nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity for PMM (Jhingran et al., 2009), and nephrotoxicity and myocarditis for conventional AmB (de Menezes et al., 2015). Much better tolerated and more efficacious, the liposomal formulation of AmB has now been positioned as first-line therapy (Sundar and Singh, 2016), despite its high cost and the need to maintain a cold chain below 25 °C (Croft and Olliaro, 2011). Adverse effects trigger poor treatment compliance which enhances the incidence of treatment failures and the risk of drug resistance development (Singh et al., 2016). With regard to the latter, SbV has lost efficacy in hyperendemic regions in India and parts of Nepal (Singh et al., 2016) and MIL increasingly faces treatment relapses (Sundar and Olliaro, 2007) but still with low incidence of intrinsic drug resistance (Cojean et al., 2012, Hendrickx et al., 2014). No clinical resistant strains have yet been reported for PMM that is mostly used in combination therapy, however, resistance selection could be achieved alarmingly fast in the laboratory (Hendrickx et al., 2014).

In response to the pressing need for new drugs, DNDi has selected three new lead series showing high efficacy against Leishmania. Representatives of each series were highly potent both in vitro and in vivo against the two VL species tested, L. infantum and L. donovani. When tested against a panel of L. infantum strains with different drug-susceptibility profiles, including clinical isolates with a SbV— and MIL-resistant background and laboratory selected MIL- and PMM-resistant strains, no cross-resistance was detected which implies that these compounds will likely have a mode-of-action that is different from the currently used antileishmanial drugs and could therefore be included in combination therapies. Co-administration or combination is now highly recommended by the WHO as it increases the chances of shortening treatment duration, lowering the costs and improving efficacy in complicated cases, such as in HIV co-infected or other immunocompromised patients. All these factors could also delay the emergence of drug-resistant parasites and increase the lifespan of the drugs (Sindermann et al., 2004). Practical examples of combination treatment are the co-administration of AmB and MIL reducing the MIL treatment from 28 to 7 days, and the combination of PMM and MIL (Sundar et al., 2011). It was recently demonstrated that the induction of resistance in vitro and in vivo was markedly delayed when MIL and PMM were used simultaneously (Hendrickx et al., 2017).

To gain further insight into the antileishmanial efficacy of the lead series, the TTK assay evaluated the cidal capacity and dynamics of the compounds on the intracellular amastigote stage of the parasite (Maes et al., 2017), providing insight whether the compounds are static (inhibiting growth) or cidal (ability to kill). Cidal versus static experiments are mostly used in the antibacterial field (Motyl et al., 2006) but have also been used more recently to study trypanocidal activity (Nare et al., 2010, De Rycker et al., 2012). The reference compounds exerted cidal activity against both Leishmania species within the 15 days of exposure when tested at a 5 × IC50 concentration. MIL exhibited the shortest TTK of 72h for L. infantum and 96h for L. donovani, but with host cell cytotoxicity within 96h of drug exposure. For the nitroimidazoles, a very short TTK was observed (<96h) for both species without any cytotoxicity. These observations are in line with a previously defined TTK of 48h for VL-2098 against L. donovani in J774 cells (Gupta et al., 2015). The oxaboroles showed TTKs comparable to the reference compounds (Table 5) but their speed of cidal activity was slower against Leishmania as compared to T. brucei (<24h) which may relate to the extracellular nature of trypanosomes (Jacobs et al., 2011, Wring et al., 2014). The aminopyrazoles showed good cidal activity against L. infantum (≤192h) but could not fully eliminate all intracellular L. donovani amastigotes (>320h). This difference might reflect limited in vitro susceptibility differences between the two reference laboratory species but does not necessarily translate to the in vivo situation where excellent efficacy is demonstrated. It is worth noticing that the aminopyrazoles are still in lead optimization phase and new, more potent compounds are currently being evaluated.

In conclusion, the newly selected DNDi lead series show great potential in view of their selective potency in vitro and in vivo, the lack of any cross-resistance with the current antileishmanial drugs and the cidal dynamics against both L. donovani and L. infantum. As such, the lead compounds could potentially be applied both in single and combination therapies. The clear cidal effects also offer perspectives in terms of a lowered risk of drug resistance and shorter treatment schedules.