Literature DB >> 32598168

The Risk of Penetration-Aspiration Related to Residue in the Pharynx.

Catriona M Steele1,2, Melanie Peladeau-Pigeon1, Emily Barrett1, Talia S Wolkin1.   

Abstract

Purpose Reference data from healthy adults under the age of 60 years suggest that the 75th and 95th percentiles for pharyngeal residue on swallows of thin liquids are 1% and 3%(C2-4)2, respectively. We explored how pharyngeal residue below versus above these values prior to a swallow predicts penetration-aspiration. Method The study involved retrospective analysis of a previous research data set from 305 adults at risk for dysphagia. Participants swallowed six thin boluses and three each of mildly, moderately, and extremely thick barium in videofluoroscopy. Raters measured preswallow residue in %(C2-4)2 units and Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores for each swallow. Swallows were classified as (a) "clean baseline" (with no preswallow residue), (b) "clearing" swallows of residue with no new material added, or (c) swallows of "additional material" plus preswallow residue. Frequencies of PAS scores of ≥ 3 were compared across swallow type by consistency according to residue severity (i.e., ≤ vs. > 1%(C2-4)2 and ≤ vs. > 3%(C2-4)2. Results The data set comprised 2,541 clean baseline, 209 clearing, and 1,722 swallows of additional material. On clean baseline swallows, frequencies of PAS scores of ≥ 3 were 5% for thin and mildly thick liquids and 1% for moderately/extremely thick liquids. Compared to clean baseline swallows, the odds of penetration-aspiration on thin liquids increased 4.60-fold above the 1% threshold and 4.20-fold above the 3% threshold (mildly thick: 2.11-fold > 1%(C2-4)2, 2.26-fold > 3%(C2-4)2). PAS scores of ≥ 3 did not occur with clearing swallows of moderately/extremely thick liquids. Lower frequencies of above-threshold preswallow residue were seen for swallows of additional material than for clearing swallows. Compared to clean baseline swallows, the odds of PAS scores of ≥ 3 on swallows of additional material increased ≥ 1.86-fold above the 1% threshold and ≥ 2.15-fold above the 3% threshold, depending on consistency. Conclusion The data suggest that a pharyngeal residue threshold of 1%(C2-4)2 is a meaningful cut-point for delineating increased risk of penetration-aspiration on a subsequent swallow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32598168      PMCID: PMC7893525          DOI: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   2.408


  23 in total

1.  Coordination of swallowing and respiration in unconscious subjects.

Authors:  T Nishino; K Hiraga
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1991-03

Review 2.  Reference intervals: the way forward.

Authors:  Ferruccio Ceriotti; Rolf Hinzmann; Mauro Panteghini
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.057

3.  A penetration-aspiration scale.

Authors:  J C Rosenbek; J A Robbins; E B Roecker; J L Coyle; J L Wood
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Coordination of breathing and swallowing: effects of bolus consistency and presentation in normal adults.

Authors:  H G Preiksaitis; C A Mills
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1996-10

5.  The relationship between residue and aspiration on the subsequent swallow: an application of the normalized residue ratio scale.

Authors:  Sonja M Molfenter; Catriona M Steele
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 6.  Image-based measurement of post-swallow residue: the normalized residue ratio scale.

Authors:  William G Pearson; Sonja M Molfenter; Zachary M Smith; Catriona M Steele
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Predictors of Residue and Airway Invasion in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  James A Curtis; Sonja Molfenter; Michelle S Troche
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 8.  Reference intervals: current status, recent developments and future considerations.

Authors:  Yesim Ozarda
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.313

9.  Quantifying Airway Invasion and Pharyngeal Residue in Patients with Dementia.

Authors:  Ashwini M Namasivayam-MacDonald; Luis F Riquelme
Journal:  Geriatrics (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-16

10.  Fluoroscopic surrogate for pharyngeal strength: the pharyngeal constriction ratio (PCR).

Authors:  Rebecca Leonard; Catherine J Rees; Peter Belafsky; Jacqui Allen
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 3.438

View more
  9 in total

1.  Dysphagia Presentation, Airway Invasion, and Gender Differences in a Clinically Based Sample of People with Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Matthew Dumican; Christopher Watts; Teresa Drulia; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Relationship Between Pharyngeal Residues Assessed by Bolus Residue Scale or Normalized Residue Ratio SCALE and Risk of Aspiration in Head and Neck Cancer Who Underwent Videofluoroscopy.

Authors:  Hsin-Hao Liou; Miyuki Hsing-Chun Hsieh; Sheng-Han Tsai; David Shang-Yu Hung; Yi-Jen Chen; Jenn-Ren Hsiao; Cheng-Chih Huang; Chun-Yen Ou; Chan-Chi Chang; Wei-Ting Lee; Sen-Tien Tsai; Shu-Wei Tsai
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 2.733

3.  Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety (VASES): A Standardized Approach to Rating Pharyngeal Residue, Penetration, and Aspiration During FEES.

Authors:  James A Curtis; James C Borders; Sarah E Perry; Avery E Dakin; Zeina N Seikaly; Michelle S Troche
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Swallowing Safety and Efficiency Impairment Profiles in Individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Raele Robison; Lauren DiBiase; Amy Ashley; Kasey McElheny; Amber Anderson; James P Wymer; Emily K Plowman
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.733

5.  [Laboratory study on bacteriological aspects of beverages and thickeners for dysphagia patients : Growth survey of Escherichia coli on thickeners and beverages].

Authors:  Lena Schmeyers; Jana Hoffmann; Steffen Schulz
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 1.292

6.  Cross-Sectional Study of Swallowing Phases in Cases of Megaesophagus Caused by Chagas Disease.

Authors:  Aretuza Zaupa Gasparim El Gharib; Roberto Oliveira Dantas
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2021-10-14

Review 7.  Phoniatricians and otorhinolaryngologists approaching oropharyngeal dysphagia: an update on FEES.

Authors:  Antonio Schindler; Laura W J Baijens; Ahmed Geneid; Nicole Pizzorni
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.236

8.  Determining the Relationship Between Hyoid Bone Kinematics and Airway Protection in Swallowing.

Authors:  Sana Smaoui; Melanie Peladeau-Pigeon; Catriona M Steele
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.674

9.  Determining the Impact of Thickened Liquids on Swallowing in Patients Undergoing Irradiation for Oropharynx Cancer.

Authors:  Carly E A Barbon; Douglas B Chepeha; Andrew J Hope; Melanie Peladeau-Pigeon; Ashley A Waito; Catriona M Steele
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.497

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.