Literature DB >> 32598001

Qualitative Validation of the Nursing Home IT Maturity Staging Model.

Kimberly R Powell, Gregory L Alexander.   

Abstract

The goal of the current study was to qualitatively explore issues of validity, specificity, and sensitivity regarding the nursing home (NH) information technology (IT) maturity survey and staging model. Participants who completed the NH IT maturity survey were recruited during pilot testing of the survey and staging model. Cognitive interviewing was used to collect qualitative data. Findings indicate the NH IT maturity survey and staging model is a straightforward and acceptable instrument. Every participant in our study agreed with the IT maturity stage assigned to their facility, based on their total score on the IT maturity survey. However, some participants were not sure how to answer some questions on the survey because they did not have in-depth knowledge of IT processes that took place outside of their NH facility and others experienced difficulty interpreting items because their NH facility was in a time of transition. The next step in development is quantitative psychometric testing and use of the instrument in a 3-year national study. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 46(7), 47-54]. Copyright 2020, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32598001      PMCID: PMC7391595          DOI: 10.3928/00989134-20200605-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs        ISSN: 0098-9134            Impact factor:   1.254


  13 in total

1.  Listening to respondents: a qualitative assessment of the Short-Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire.

Authors:  Sara Mallinson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Managing strategic outsourcing in the healthcare industry.

Authors:  V Roberts
Journal:  J Healthc Manag       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods.

Authors:  Debbie Collins
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  What is nursing home quality and how is it measured?

Authors:  Nicholas G Castle; Jamie C Ferguson
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2010-07-14

Review 5.  A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability.

Authors:  Holli A DeVon; Michelle E Block; Patricia Moyle-Wright; Diane M Ernst; Susan J Hayden; Deborah J Lazzara; Suzanne M Savoy; Elizabeth Kostas-Polston
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.176

6.  Adoption of Health Information Technology Among US Nursing Facilities.

Authors:  Joshua R Vest; Hye-Young Jung; Kevin Wiley; Harold Kooreman; Lorren Pettit; Mark A Unruh
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.669

7.  A National Report of Nursing Home Quality and Information Technology: Two-Year Trends.

Authors:  Gregory L Alexander; Richard Madsen
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2018 Jul/Sep       Impact factor: 1.597

8.  Building consensus toward a national nursing home information technology maturity model.

Authors:  Gregory L Alexander; Kimberly Powell; Chelsea B Deroche; Lori Popejoy; Abu Saleh Mohammad Mosa; Richelle Koopman; Lorren Pettit; Michelle Dougherty
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  A national report of nursing home information technology: year 1 results.

Authors:  Gregory L Alexander; Richard W Madsen; Erin L Miller; Melissa K Schaumberg; Allison E Holm; Rachel L Alexander; Keely K Wise; Michelle L Dougherty; Brian Gugerty
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity.

Authors:  Enas Almanasreh; Rebekah Moles; Timothy F Chen
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2018-03-27
View more
  1 in total

1.  A mixed-methods analysis of telehealth implementation in nursing homes amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Kimberly R Powell; Amy E Winkler; Jianfang Liu; Gregory L Alexander
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 7.538

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.