Gregory L Alexander1, Richard W Madsen2, Erin L Miller3, Melissa K Schaumberg4, Allison E Holm5, Rachel L Alexander6, Keely K Wise7, Michelle L Dougherty8, Brian Gugerty9. 1. University of Missouri, S415 Sinclair School of Nursing, Columbia, MO 65211, USA alexanderg@missouri.edu. 2. Medical Research Office, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. 3. Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. 4. School of Social Work, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. 5. Department of Health Management and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. 6. Lyon College, Batesville, AR, USA. 7. Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. 8. Center for the Advancement of Health IT, RTI International, Mahtomedi, MN, USA. 9. Clinical Informatics Division, GiC Informatics, LLC, Annapolis, MD, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide a report on year 1 results of a national study investigating nursing home information technology (IT) adoption, called IT sophistication. METHODS: A reliable and valid survey was used to measure IT sophistication. The target goal was 10% from each state in the United States, 1570 nursing homes. A random sample of homes from each state was recruited from Nursing Home Compare. RESULTS: The team reached 2627 nursing home administrators, among whom 1799 administrators agreed to participate and were sent a survey. A total of 815 surveys were completed (45.3% response rate), which was below the goal. Facilities in the participating sample have similar demographic characteristics (ownership, total population in a location, and bed size) to the remaining homes not participating. There are greater IT capabilities in resident care and administrative activities, less in clinical support. The extent of use of these capabilities appears to be highest in administrative activities and lowest in clinical support. IT in resident care appears to be the most integrated with internal and external stakeholders. IT capabilities appear to be greater than IT extent of use in all health domains, with the greatest difference in resident care. DISCUSSION: National evaluations of nursing home IT are rare. Measuring trends in IT adoption in a nationally representative sample provides meaningful analytics that could be more useful for policy makers and nursing home leaders in the future. CONCLUSION: Discovering national baseline assessments is a first step toward recognizing nursing home trends in IT adoption.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a report on year 1 results of a national study investigating nursing home information technology (IT) adoption, called IT sophistication. METHODS: A reliable and valid survey was used to measure IT sophistication. The target goal was 10% from each state in the United States, 1570 nursing homes. A random sample of homes from each state was recruited from Nursing Home Compare. RESULTS: The team reached 2627 nursing home administrators, among whom 1799 administrators agreed to participate and were sent a survey. A total of 815 surveys were completed (45.3% response rate), which was below the goal. Facilities in the participating sample have similar demographic characteristics (ownership, total population in a location, and bed size) to the remaining homes not participating. There are greater IT capabilities in resident care and administrative activities, less in clinical support. The extent of use of these capabilities appears to be highest in administrative activities and lowest in clinical support. IT in resident care appears to be the most integrated with internal and external stakeholders. IT capabilities appear to be greater than IT extent of use in all health domains, with the greatest difference in resident care. DISCUSSION: National evaluations of nursing home IT are rare. Measuring trends in IT adoption in a nationally representative sample provides meaningful analytics that could be more useful for policy makers and nursing home leaders in the future. CONCLUSION: Discovering national baseline assessments is a first step toward recognizing nursing home trends in IT adoption.
Authors: Joshua R Vest; Hye-Young Jung; Kevin Wiley; Harold Kooreman; Lorren Pettit; Mark A Unruh Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Gregory L Alexander; Kimberly Powell; Chelsea B Deroche; Lori Popejoy; Abu Saleh Mohammad Mosa; Richelle Koopman; Lorren Pettit; Michelle Dougherty Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Gregory L Alexander; Andrew Georgiou; Kevin Doughty; Andrew Hornblow; Anne Livingstone; Michelle Dougherty; Stephen Jacobs; Malcolm J Fisk Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 4.046