Literature DB >> 11820675

Listening to respondents: a qualitative assessment of the Short-Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire.

Sara Mallinson1.   

Abstract

Standardised health status questionnaires are widely used to obtain subjective assessments of health. However, little research has investigated the meaning of the data they produce. Statistical tests will highlight some problems with the structure and wording of a questionnaire but they cannot shed any light on the way in which respondents interpret questions or their intended meaning when they select a response. Various qualitative techniques are being used within disciplines such as sociology and psychology to test both the language of survey instruments and the cognitive bases of surveys. This paper outlines some of these methods and reports findings from a qualitative research study in the UK with a widely used questionnaire--the Short-Form 36 Health Status Questionnaire. The value of including in-depth, qualitative validation techniques in the development and testing of surveys used to collect subjective assessments of health is clearly demonstrated by the findings of the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11820675     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00003-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  53 in total

1.  Qualitative Validation of the Nursing Home IT Maturity Staging Model.

Authors:  Kimberly R Powell; Gregory L Alexander
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 1.254

2.  Cognitive aspects of survey methodology and quality of life assessment.

Authors:  Elaine McColl; Keith Meadows; Ivan Barofsky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Gender, educational and age differences in meanings that underlie global self-rated health.

Authors:  Wim Peersman; Dirk Cambier; Jan De Maeseneer; Sara Willems
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Choosing a patient-reported outcome measure.

Authors:  Leah M McClimans; John Browne
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2011-02

5.  Perceptions of a Quality of Work-Life Survey from the Perspective of Employees in a Canadian Cancer Centre.

Authors:  Joanna E M Sale
Journal:  Qual Quant       Date:  2007

6.  Preferences of adults with spinal cord injury for widely used health-related quality of life and subjective well-being measures.

Authors:  Alina Ionela Palimaru; William E Cunningham; Marcus Dillistone; Arturo Vargas-Bustamante; Honghu Liu; Ron D Hays
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  How do stakeholder groups vary in a Delphi technique about primary mental health care and what factors influence their ratings?

Authors:  S M Campbell; T Shield; A Rogers; L Gask
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-12

8.  A qualitative validation of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire.

Authors:  Tony Hak; Dick Willems; Gerrit van der Wal; Frans Visser
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Suffering.

Authors:  Tom Sensky
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 5.120

10.  Cross-language differential item functioning of the job content questionnaire among European countries: the JACE study.

Authors:  Bongkyoo Choi; Jakob Blue Bjorner; Per-Olof Ostergren; Els Clays; Irene Houtman; Laura Punnett; Annika Rosengren; Dirk De Bacquer; Marco Ferrario; Maaike Bilau; Robert Karasek
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.