| Literature DB >> 32596975 |
Ariane C Scheuren1, Gommaar D'Hulst2, Gisela A Kuhn1, Evi Masschelein2, Esther Wehrle1, Katrien De Bock2, Ralph Müller1.
Abstract
<span class="abstract_title">BACKGROUND: Frailty is a geriatric syndrome characterized by increased susceptibility to adverse health outcomes. One major determinant thereof is the g<span class="Gene">radual weakening of the musculoskeletal system and the associated osteosarcopenia. To improve our understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and, more importantly, to test potential interventions aimed at counteracting frailty, suitable animal models are needed.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Osteopenia; Osteosarcopenia; Sarcopenia; in vivo micro-CT; mTORC1
Year: 2020 PMID: 32596975 PMCID: PMC7432580 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12588
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle ISSN: 2190-5991 Impact factor: 12.910
FIGURE 1Comparison of the frailty and musculoskeletal phenotypes at different ages. (A) Frailty index (FI) assessed in PolgA and wild type (WT) at 34, 40, and 46 weeks (n = 9–35/group). (B) Longitudinal monitoring of FI in individual mice (n = 9–12/group) at 34 (solid bars) and 40 weeks (striped bars). (C) The natural logarithm FI was plotted as a function of age. The slope of the regression lines through these data, which represent the rate of deficit accumulation, was higher in PolgA mice. (D–I) PolgA mice displayed lower bone and muscle mass and cross‐sectional area compared with WT. (D) Femoral cortical bone volume (Ct.BV) and (E) cortical marrow volume (Ct.MV) (n = 8–12/group). (G) Muscle weight and (H) fibre area (n = 5–7/group). Representative cross sections of (C) femoral bone and (F) anterior (TA) muscle of PolgA and WT mice at 46 weeks. Data represent mean ± SEM; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.0001. WT (blue bars) vs. PolgA (red bars) determined by unpaired t‐test, corrected for multiple comparisons by Bonferroni; for (B), *** P < 0.0001 WT vs. PolgA and #P < 0.05, ###P < 0.0001 over time determined by two‐way analysis of variance.
FIGURE 2Muscle phenotyping at 40 (upper row, A–C) and 46 weeks (lower row, D–F). (A,D) forelimb grip strength (n = 9–12/group). (B,E) force frequency at 1, 30, 50, 80, 150, 250, and 300 Hz. (C,F) force frequency relative to EDL muscle weight (n = 6–8/group). Data represent mean ± SEM; (*)P < 0.10, * P < 0.05 by Student's t‐tests (A–D) and two‐way ANOVA (E–H).
Forces eccentric muscle contractions at 40 and 46 weeks
| Average peak force (mV) | 40 weeks | 46 weeks | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | PolgA | WT | PolgA | |
| All contractions | 149.9 ± 9.7 | 142.8 ± 15.7 | 141.6 ± 9.6 | 137.3 ± 8.8 |
| 1st set | 193.3 ± 12.4 | 158.8 ± 17.5 | 188.5 ± 6.6 | 164.6 ± 8.6(*) |
| 10th set | 108.8 ± 8.0 | 107.5 ± 11.2 | 98.6 ± 8.2 | 111.8 ± 5.8 |
WT, wild type.
(*) P < 0.10 WT vs. PolgA at 40 and 46 weeks, respectively determined by unpaired t‐test, corrected for multiple comparisons by Bonferroni.
FIGURE 3Downstream mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signalling upon eccentric contraction (ECC) in wild type (WT) and PolgA EDL. Downstream mTORC1 targets pS6K1 and pRPS6 increased upon ECC both at 40 (A,B) and 46 weeks (D,E). (C,F) representative blots. Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 6–7/group, within genotypes: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.001 ECC (squares/striped bars) vs. CTL (circles/solid bars) by paired Student's t‐test, between genotypes: (#)P < 0.10, #P < 0.05 by unpaired Student's t‐test ∆ECC‐CTL and basal values.
FIGURE 4Downstream mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling upon eccentric contraction (ECC) in wild type (WT) and PolgA EDL. pSAPK/JNK, but not p44/42 MAPK ERK1/2 increased upon ECC both at 40 (A,B) and 46 weeks (D,E). (C,F) representative blots. Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 6–7/group, within genotypes: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.001 ECC (squares/striped bars) vs. CTL (circles/solid bars) by paired Student's t‐test, between genotypes: (#)P < 0.10, #P < 0.05 by unpaired Student's t‐test ∆ECC‐CTL and basal values.
FIGURE 5Downstream mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signalling after leucine administration in vivo and in vitro. (A–C). pRPS6 and pS6K1 signalling 30 min after submaximal dose of leucine gavage in vivo in 46‐week‐old wild type (WT) and PolgA. Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 3–6/group, within genotypes: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.001, *** P < 0.0001 LEU (squares/striped bars) vs. CTL (circles/solid bars), between genotypes: (#)P < 0.10, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.001 determined by two‐way analysis of variance. (C) Representative blots. (D–I) Proliferation and downstream mTORC1 signalling in primary myotubes from WT and PolgA muscle. (D,E) Cell proliferation was analysed by EdU labelling and (F) cell count. (G) Brightfield of two‐dimensional differentiated myotubes. (H) Representative blots of dose‐response leucine experiment in fully differentiated WT and PolgA myoblasts. (I) Quantification of pS6K1 from three independent experiments. Data represent mean ± SEM, * P < 0.05 WT (blue line/bars) vs. PolgA (red line/bars), #P < 0.05 over time determined by two‐way analysis of variance.
FIGURE 6Longitudinal monitoring of trabecular and cortical bone morphometric parameters over 20 weeks: (A) bone volume fraction (BV/TV), (B) trabecular thickness (Tb. Th), (C) trabecular number (Tb. N), (D) trabecular separation (Tb. Sp), (F) cortical area fraction (Ct.Ar/Tt.Ar), (G) cortical thickness (Ct. Th), (H) cortical bone volume (Ct.BV), and (I) cortical marrow volume (Ct.MV). (E,J) Bone microstructure (cross sections) of representative (median) wild type (WT) (top row) and PolgA (bottom row) mice at 20 (left) and 40 (right) weeks of age. In WT mice, thickening of trabeculae and cortex can be observed, while in PolgA mice, little change can be seen between time points. Data represent mean ± SEM; n = 9 WT and n = 12 PolgA, * P < 0.05 WT (blue line) vs. PolgA (red line); #P < 0.05 over time determined by linear mixed model and Tukey's post‐hoc.
FIGURE 7Longitudinal monitoring of dynamic bone morphometry parameters over 20 weeks: (A) bone formation rate (BFR), (B) bone resorption rate (BRR), (C) mineral apposition rate (MAR), (D)mineral resorption rate (MRR), (E)mineralizing surface (MS) and (F) eroding surface (ES). Data represent mean ± SEM; n = 9 wild type (WT) and n = 12 PolgA; * P < 0.05 WT (blue line) vs. PolgA (red line); #P < 0.05 over time determined by linear mixed model and Tukey's post‐hoc. (G) Overlay of thresholded micro‐computed tomography images from 20 and 40 weeks showing sites of formation (orange), quiescence (grey), and resorption (blue) in representative WT and PolgA mouse. Serum bone turnover markers for (H) formation (PINP) and (I) resorption (CTX‐1) at 40 weeks of age. Data represent mean ± SEM; n = 8 WT and n = 3 PolgA; * P < 0.05 WT (blue bar) vs. PolgA (red bar) determined by Mann–Whitney test.
FIGURE 8Basal mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) and mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling in wild type (WT) and PolgA caudal vertebrae at 40 weeks. PolgA mice showed a tendency towards reduced downstream mTORC1 targets pS6K1 (A) and pRPS6 (B). Downstream MAPK target pSAPK/JNK (C), but not p44/42 MAPK (D) was lower in PolgA compared with WT. (E) Representative blots with positive control (muscle tissue). Overall signal was low in bone lysates, so pS6K1 and pRPS6 are overexposed. Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 5–6/genotype, (*)P ≤ 0.10, * P < 0.05 PolgA (red bars) vs. WT (blue) by unpaired Student's t‐test.
FIGURE 9Effect of cyclic mechanical loading on trabecular bone morphometric parameters in PolgA and wild‐type (WT) mice at young (top) and old age (bottom): (A,C) bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and (B,D) trabecular thickness (Tb. Th) at the end of the loading intervention. Data represent mean ± SEM, n = 8–11/group; * P < 0.05, *** P < 0.0001 CTL (circles/solid bars) vs. loading (squares/striped bars).