Literature DB >> 32596957

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting: from evolution to clinical applications.

Jean J L Hsieh1,2, Imants Svalbe3.   

Abstract

In 2013, Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF) emerged as a method for fast, quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging. This paper reviews the current status of MRF up to early 2020 and aims to highlight the advantages MRF can offer medical imaging professionals. By acquiring scan data as pseudorandom samples, MRF elicits a unique signal evolution, or 'fingerprint', from each tissue type. It matches 'randomised' free induction decay acquisitions against pre-computed simulated tissue responses to generate a set of quantitative images of T1 , T2 and proton density (PD) with co-registered voxels, rather than as traditional relative T1 - and T2 -weighted images. MRF numeric pixel values retain accuracy and reproducibility between 2% and 8%. MRF acquisition is robust to strong undersampling of k-space. Scan sequences have been optimised to suppress sub-sampling artefacts, while artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques have been employed to increase matching speed and precision. MRF promises improved patient comfort with reduced scan times and fewer image artefacts. Quantitative MRF data could be used to define population-wide numeric biomarkers that classify normal versus diseased tissue. Certification of clinical centres for MRF scan repeatability would permit numeric comparison of sequential images for any individual patient and the pooling of multiple patient images across large, cross-site imaging studies. MRF has to date shown promising results in early clinical trials, demonstrating reliable differentiation between malignant and benign prostate conditions, and normal and sclerotic hippocampal tissue. MRF is now undergoing small-scale trials at several sites across the world; moving it closer to routine clinical application.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; MR fingerprinting; magnetic resonance imaging; quantitative MRI; reproducibility of results

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32596957      PMCID: PMC7754037          DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci        ISSN: 2051-3895


  61 in total

1.  7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal-to-noise comparison in head images.

Authors:  J T Vaughan; M Garwood; C M Collins; W Liu; L DelaBarre; G Adriany; P Andersen; H Merkle; R Goebel; M B Smith; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  RCA-U-Net: Residual Channel Attention U-Net for Fast Tissue Quantification in Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting.

Authors:  Zhenghan Fang; Yong Chen; Dong Nie; Weili Lin; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2019-10-10

3.  Pseudo Steady-State Free Precession for MR-Fingerprinting.

Authors:  Jakob Assländer; Steffen J Glaser; Jürgen Hennig
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Spiral blurring correction with water-fat separation for magnetic resonance fingerprinting in the breast.

Authors:  Teresa Nolte; Nicolas Gross-Weege; Mariya Doneva; Peter Koken; Aaldert Elevelt; Daniel Truhn; Christiane Kuhl; Volkmar Schulz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance fingerprinting review part 2: Technique and directions.

Authors:  Debra F McGivney; Rasim Boyacıoğlu; Yun Jiang; Megan E Poorman; Nicole Seiberlich; Vikas Gulani; Kathryn E Keenan; Mark A Griswold; Dan Ma
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  MR vascular fingerprinting: A new approach to compute cerebral blood volume, mean vessel radius, and oxygenation maps in the human brain.

Authors:  T Christen; N A Pannetier; W W Ni; D Qiu; M E Moseley; N Schuff; G Zaharchuk
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Investigating and reducing the effects of confounding factors for robust T1 and T2 mapping with cardiac MR fingerprinting.

Authors:  Jesse I Hamilton; Yun Jiang; Dan Ma; Wei-Ching Lo; Vikas Gulani; Mark Griswold; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Fast magnetic resonance fingerprinting for dynamic contrast-enhanced studies in mice.

Authors:  Yuning Gu; Charlie Y Wang; Christian E Anderson; Yuchi Liu; He Hu; Mette L Johansen; Dan Ma; Yun Jiang; Ciro Ramos-Estebanez; Susann Brady-Kalnay; Mark A Griswold; Chris A Flask; Xin Yu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Cartesian MR fingerprinting in the eye at 7T using compressed sensing and matrix completion-based reconstructions.

Authors:  Kirsten Koolstra; Jan-Willem Maria Beenakker; Peter Koken; Andrew Webb; Peter Börnert
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Fast multi-component analysis using a joint sparsity constraint for MR fingerprinting.

Authors:  Martijn Nagtegaal; Peter Koken; Thomas Amthor; Mariya Doneva
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  3 in total

1.  Reproducibility of magnetic resonance fingerprinting-based T1 mapping of the healthy prostate at 1.5 and 3.0 T: A proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Nikita Sushentsev; Joshua D Kaggie; Rhys A Slough; Bruno Carmo; Tristan Barrett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Multicenter Repeatability and Reproducibility of MR Fingerprinting in Phantoms and in Prostatic Tissue.

Authors:  Wei-Ching Lo; Leonardo Kayat Bittencourt; Ananya Panda; Yun Jiang; Junichi Tokuda; Ravi Seethamraju; Clare Tempany-Afdhal; Verena Obmann; Katherine Wright; Mark Griswold; Nicole Seiberlich; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.737

Review 3.  Current approaches and advances in the imaging of stroke.

Authors:  Pragati Kakkar; Tarun Kakkar; Tufail Patankar; Sikha Saha
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.758

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.