Literature DB >> 33513165

Reproducibility of magnetic resonance fingerprinting-based T1 mapping of the healthy prostate at 1.5 and 3.0 T: A proof-of-concept study.

Nikita Sushentsev1, Joshua D Kaggie1, Rhys A Slough1, Bruno Carmo1, Tristan Barrett1,2.   

Abstract

Facilitating clinical translation of quantitative imaging techniques has been suggested as means of improving interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate. One such technique, magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF), has significant competitive advantages over conventional mapping techniques in terms of its multi-site reproducibility, short scanning time and inherent robustness to motion. It has also been shown to improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer when added to standard mpMRI sequences, however, the existing studies have all been conducted on 3.0 T MRI systems, limiting the technique's use on 1.5 T MRI scanners that are still more widely used for prostate imaging across the globe. The aim of this proof-of-concept study was, therefore, to evaluate the cross-system reproducibility of prostate MRF T1 in healthy volunteers (HVs) using 1.5 and 3.0 T MRI systems. The initial validation of MRF T1 against gold standard inversion recovery fast spin echo (IR-FSE) T1 in the ISMRM/NIST MRI system revealed a strong linear correlation between phantom-derived MRF and IR-FSE T1 values was observed at both field strengths (R2 = 0.998 at 1.5T and R2 = 0.993 at 3T; p = < 0.0001 for both). In young HVs, inter-scanner CVs demonstrated marginal differences across all tissues with the highest difference of 3% observed in fat (2% at 1.5T vs 5% at 3T). At both field strengths, MRF T1 could confidently differentiate prostate peripheral zone from transition zone, which highlights the high quantitative potential of the technique given the known difficulty of tissue differentiation in this age group. The high cross-system reproducibility of MRF T1 relaxometry of the healthy prostate observed in this preliminary study, therefore, supports the technique's prospective clinical validation as part of larger trials employing 1.5 T MRI systems, which are still widely used clinically for routine mpMRI of the prostate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33513165      PMCID: PMC7846281          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  46 in total

1.  T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T.

Authors:  Greg J Stanisz; Ewa E Odrobina; Joseph Pun; Michael Escaravage; Simon J Graham; Michael J Bronskill; R Mark Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability.

Authors:  Paul A Yushkevich; Joseph Piven; Heather Cody Hazlett; Rachel Gimpel Smith; Sean Ho; James C Gee; Guido Gerig
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  PI-RADS version 2.1: one small step for prostate MRI.

Authors:  T Barrett; A Rajesh; A B Rosenkrantz; P L Choyke; B Turkbey
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate at 1.5 versus 3.0T: A prospective comparison study of image quality.

Authors:  T Ullrich; M Quentin; C Oelers; F Dietzel; L M Sawicki; C Arsov; R Rabenalt; P Albers; G Antoch; D Blondin; H J Wittsack; L Schimmöller
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance fingerprinting: a technical review.

Authors:  Bhairav Bipin Mehta; Simone Coppo; Debra Frances McGivney; Jesse Ian Hamilton; Yong Chen; Yun Jiang; Dan Ma; Nicole Seiberlich; Vikas Gulani; Mark Alan Griswold
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Multi-site repeatability and reproducibility of MR fingerprinting of the healthy brain at 1.5 and 3.0 T.

Authors:  Guido Buonincontri; Laura Biagi; Alessandra Retico; Paolo Cecchi; Mirco Cosottini; Ferdia A Gallagher; Pedro A Gómez; Martin J Graves; Mary A McLean; Frank Riemer; Rolf F Schulte; Michela Tosetti; Fulvio Zaccagna; Joshua D Kaggie
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  High Diagnostic Performance of Short Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-naïve Men: The Next Step in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accessibility.

Authors:  Marloes van der Leest; Bas Israël; Erik Bastiaan Cornel; Patrik Zámecnik; Ivo G Schoots; Hans van der Lelij; Anwar R Padhani; Maroeska Rovers; Inge van Oort; Michiel Sedelaar; Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Gerjon Hannink; Jeroen Veltman; Jelle Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-06-02       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  Quantitative Prostate MRI.

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Christopher S Lim; Fatemeh Zabihollahy; Jorge Abreu-Gomez; Satheesh Krishna; Sungmin Woo; Gerd Melkus; Eran Ukwatta; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Defining the learning curve for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate using MRI-transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsies as a validation tool.

Authors:  Gabriele Gaziev; Karan Wadhwa; Tristan Barrett; Brendan C Koo; Ferdia A Gallagher; Eva Serrao; Julia Frey; Jonas Seidenader; Lina Carmona; Anne Warren; Vincent Gnanapragasam; Andrew Doble; Christof Kastner
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Certification in reporting multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: recommendations of a UK consensus meeting.

Authors:  Tristan Barrett; Anwar R Padhani; Amit Patel; Hashim U Ahmed; Clare Allen; Harry Bardgett; Jane Belfield; Mrishta Brizmohun Appayya; Thomas Harding; Ornella-Shanin Hoch; Julian Y Keanie; Sidath H Liyanage; Marianthi-Vasiliki Papoutsaki; Shonit Punwani; Mark J C Robinson; Arumugam Rajesh; John N Stafurth; Jan van der Meulen; Jonathan Richenberg
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  1 in total

1.  Multicenter Repeatability and Reproducibility of MR Fingerprinting in Phantoms and in Prostatic Tissue.

Authors:  Wei-Ching Lo; Leonardo Kayat Bittencourt; Ananya Panda; Yun Jiang; Junichi Tokuda; Ravi Seethamraju; Clare Tempany-Afdhal; Verena Obmann; Katherine Wright; Mark Griswold; Nicole Seiberlich; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.737

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.