| Literature DB >> 32596312 |
Hui Wang1, Wenjing Yu1, Tao Wu1, Yangyang Xue1, Dan Zhang1, Huiqin Xu1.
Abstract
METHODS: From January 2010 to October 2019, a total of 23 patients who pathologically confirmed to have AITL were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT scan before chemotherapy. The 18F-FDG PET/CT features, clinical data, laboratory indicators, Ki67 labeling index, and survival status were collected and analyzed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32596312 PMCID: PMC7298254 DOI: 10.1155/2020/4502489
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Patients' outcome and related clinical data.
| Case | Median OS (month) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.291 | ||
| Male | 14 (60.87%) | 49 | |
| Female | 9 (39.13%) | 15 | |
| Age (years) | 0.844 | ||
| ≥60 | 16 (69.57%) | 28 | |
| <60 | 7 (30.43%) | 23 | |
| B symptom | 0.056 | ||
| Yes | 13 (56.52%) | 19 | |
| No | 10 (43.48%) | 49 | |
| ECOG score | 0.012∗ | ||
| ≤1 | 18 (78.26%) | 49 | |
| >1 | 5 (21.74%) | 10 | |
| Ann Arbor stage | 0.071 | ||
| I~II | 3 (13.04%) | 42 | |
| III~IV | 20 (86.96%) | 15.5 | |
| IPI score | 0.400 | ||
| 0~2 | 11 (47.83%) | 49 | |
| 3~5 | 12 (52.17%) | 23 | |
| LDH (U/L) | 0.579 | ||
| Abnormal (>250) | 18 (78.26%) | 23 | |
| Normal (≤250) | 5 (21.74%) | 19 | |
| Albumin (g/L) | 0.218 | ||
| Abnormal (<40) | 17 (73.91%) | 19 | |
| Normal (40-55) | 6 (26.09%) | 49 | |
|
| 0.650 | ||
| Abnormal (>2.3) | 18 (78.26%) | 23 | |
| Normal | 5 (21.74%) | 42 | |
| Serous cavity effusion | 0.026∗ | ||
| Yes | 8 (34.78%) | 10 | |
| No | 15 (65.22%) | 49 | |
| Ki-67 | 0.028∗ | ||
| ≥45% | 15 (65.22%) | 19 | |
| <45% | 8 (34.78%) | 28 | |
| SUVmax of infiltrated lymph nodes | 0.202 | ||
| ≥7.85 | 18 (78.26%) | 19 | |
| <7.85 | 5 (21.74%) | 23 | |
| SUVmax of extranodal lesions | 0.016∗ | ||
| ≥4.1 | 12 (70.59%) | 15 | |
| <4.1 | 5 (29.41%) | 49 | |
| Extranodal involvement | 0.021∗ | ||
| ≤1 | 14 (60.87%) | 49 | |
| >1 | 9 (39.13%) | 16 |
LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; CRP: C-reactive protein; β2-MG: beta 2-microglobulin; IPI: international prognostic index; ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; OS: overall survival; SUVmax: the maximum standardized uptake values. Compared within groups: ∗P < 0.05.
Optimal thresholds for predicting patient mortality.
| Ki67 (%) | SUVmax of infiltrated lymph nodes | SUVmax of extranodal lesions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optimal threshold | 45% | 7.85 | 4.1 |
| Sensitivity (%) | 83.3% | 100% | 88.9% |
| Specificity (%) | 54.5% | 37.5% | 75.0% |
| Area under the ROC curve | 0.659 | 0.618 | 0.806 |
Figure 1Image captured from a 55-year-old female AITL patient. PET/CT images: (a) body sites; (b, c) an axial PET and CT image show large splenic infiltration (SUVmax = 4.6), no change in density in CT; (d, e) illustrate infiltrated lymph nodes in bilateral iliac region (SUVmax = 10.9).
Figure 2Image captured from a 65-year-old male AITL patient. PET/CT images: (a) whole-body maximum intensity projection (MIP) image displays infiltration in multiple body sites; (b, c) an axial PET and CT image show infiltration in pharynx nasalis with high 18F-FDG uptake (SUVmax = 11.3); (d, e) illustrate infiltrated bilateral tonsils (SUVmax = 12.5).
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival by ECOG score, serous cavity effusion, Ki-67 labeling index, extranodal involvement, and the SUVmax of extranodal lesions. The optimal cut-off values were obtained by using ROC curve analysis.
Multivariate analysis for survivals.
| OS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI |
| |
| ECOG | 7.089 | 1.238~40.604 | 0.028∗ |
| Serous cavity effusion | 3.403 | 0.864~13.399 | 0.080 |
| Extranodal involvement | 0.729 | 0.088~6.027 | 0.770 |
| SUVmax of extranodal lesions | 16.319 | 1.416~188.082 | 0.025∗ |
| Ki-67 | 2.820 | 0.281~28.329 | 0.378 |
ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; OS: overall survival; SUVmax: the maximum standardized uptake values. Compared within groups: ∗P < 0.05.