| Literature DB >> 32594571 |
Hirofumi Ohtaki1,2, Akifumi Takahashi1, Ayumi Niwa3, Jun Yonetamari3, Asami Nakayama4, Tomokazu Kuchibiro5, Hirotoshi Ohta3, Hiroyasu Ito2, Hisashi Baba6, Nobuo Murakami6, Kiyofumi Ohkusu7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry is gradually spreading among large-scale laboratories; however, this method is impractical for small-scale laboratories. In laboratories without access to these rapid identification methods, problems related to them remain unsolved. In this study, we aimed to develop a rapid and inexpensive method to presumptively identify Enterobacterales using CHROMagar Orientation medium.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990Enterobacteraleszzm321990; CHROMagar Orientation medium; presumptive identification; rapid biochemical tests
Year: 2020 PMID: 32594571 PMCID: PMC7595914 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Lab Anal ISSN: 0887-8013 Impact factor: 2.352
The algorithm for presumptive identification of Enterobacterales using CHROMagar Orientation medium
| Colony color | IND | LDC | ODC | H2S | Expected isolate(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Purplish pink | + |
| |||
| Metallic blue | − | + | − |
| |
| + | + | − |
| ||
| − | + | + |
| ||
| − | − | + |
| ||
| + or − | − | − |
| ||
| + | − | + |
| ||
| Aqua blue |
| ||||
| Brown | − | − | + | + |
|
| − | − | − | + |
| |
| + | − | − | + |
| |
| + | − | − | − |
| |
| + | − | + | − |
| |
| Other colors | Should be confirmed by other methods | ||||
Abbreviations: −, negative reaction; +, positive reaction; IND, indole; LDC, lysine decarboxylase; ODC, ornithine decarboxylase.
Evaluation of the new method using clinical isolates
| Category | Species (number of strains) | Species level | Genus level | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concordance | Discordance | Accuracy | Concordance | Discordance | Accuracy | ||
| A. Bacterial species included in the algorithm |
| 156 | 1 | 99.4% | 156 | 1 | 99.4% |
|
| 41 | 0 | 100% | 41 | 0 | 100% | |
|
| 34 | 0 | 100% | 34 | 0 | 100% | |
|
| 82 | 3 | 96.5% | 82 | 3 | 96.5% | |
|
| 25 | 1 | 96.2% | 25 | 1 | 96.2% | |
|
| 16 | 0 | 100% | 16 | 0 | 100% | |
|
| 22 | 4 | 84.6% | 22 | 4 | 84.6% | |
|
| 43 | 1 | 97.7% | 43 | 1 | 97.7% | |
|
| 7 | 0 | 100% | 7 | 0 | 100% | |
|
| 5 | 0 | 100% | 5 | 0 | 100% | |
|
| 21 | 0 | 100% | 21 | 0 | 100% | |
|
| N/A | N/A | N/A | 9 | 1 | 90.0% | |
| Total (472) | 452 | 10 | 97.8% | 461 | 11 | 97.7% | |
| B. Bacterial species not included in the algorithm |
| 0 | 25 | 0% | 25 | 0 | 100% |
|
| 0 | 2 | 0% | 0 | 2 | 0% | |
|
| 0 | 3 | 0% | 0 | 3 | 0% | |
|
| 0 | 3 | 0% | 1 | 2 | 66.7% | |
|
| 0 | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0 | 100% | |
|
| 0 | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0 | 100% | |
|
| N/A | N/A | N/A | 0 | 1 | 0% | |
| Total (36) | 0 | 35 | 0% | 28 | 8 | 75.0% | |
| A + B | Total (508) | 452 | 45 | 90.9% | 489 | 19 | 96.3% |
Abbreviation: N/A, not applicable.
Causes of misidentification in the new method
| Category | Species (number of strains) | Identification results by the algorithm (number of strains) | The causes of discordance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial species included in the algorithm |
|
| LDC negative |
|
|
| ODC negative | |
|
| LDC positive | ||
|
|
| LDC positive | |
|
|
| Colony color (metallic blue) | |
|
| Not identified (1) | H2S negative | |
|
| Not identified (1) | IND negative | |
| Bacterial species not included in the algorithm |
|
| Not included in the algorithm |
|
| |||
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
| Not identified (1) | |||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
| Not identified (1) |
FIGURE 1Flowchart of presumptive identification method using CHROMagar Orientation medium. DMACA, p‐dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde reagent; H2S, hydrogen sulfide; Kovac, Kovac's reagent; LDC, lysine decarboxylase; ODC, ornithine decarboxylase