Literature DB >> 32593211

The effect of the number of active electrode poles during tined lead placement on long-term efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in patients with faecal incontinence.

R Assmann1, S O Breukink1, S A P Caubergh2, L P S Stassen1, S M J van Kuijk3, J Melenhorst1.   

Abstract

AIM: There is an ongoing debate as to whether or not the efficacy of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is optimized by maximizing the total number of active electrode poles (AEPs) during lead placement because there are more programming options. However, this is at the cost of increased operating time. The aims of this study were to establish if a higher number of AEPs improves SNM efficacy during the trial period and after permanent implantable pulse generator (IPG) placement and if there is there a correlation between number of AEPs and battery life of the first placed IPG.
METHOD: This was a single centre retrospective cohort study of new patients with faecal incontinence who underwent SNM between 2000 and 2018. Exclusion criteria were sphincter defect > 30%, rectocele/enterocele Grade 3 or higher and incomplete records.
RESULTS: In all, 288/456 (63%) patients (women 91%; mean age 58.5 ± 11.7 years) were eligible for analysis. The number of AEPs during lead placement was two (n = 42, 14.5%), three (n = 82, 28.5%) and four (n = 164, 57%). There was no association between the number of AEPs during tined lead placement and long-term efficacy. Neither the success rate of the trial phase nor the battery life after first placed IPG was influenced by the number of AEPs.
CONCLUSION: In this study, the number of AEPs does not seem to influence long-term efficacy of SNM success rate during the trial phase or the battery life of the first placed IPG. However, we also suggest that at the very least there should be two AEPs at lead placement.
© 2020 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sacral neuromodulation; faecal incontinence; surgery; tined lead placement

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32593211      PMCID: PMC7818456          DOI: 10.1111/codi.15223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.917


  13 in total

1.  Sacral neuromodulation: long-term outcome and quality of life in patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  O Uludağ; J Melenhorst; S M P Koch; W G van Gemert; C H C Dejong; C G M I Baeten
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: long-term outcome.

Authors:  K E Matzel; P Lux; S Heuer; M Besendörfer; W Zhang
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Fecal incontinence treated by sacral neuromodulation: Long-term follow-up of 325 patients.

Authors:  Paul T J Janssen; Sara Z Kuiper; Laurents P S Stassen; Nicole D Bouvy; Stephanie O Breukink; Jarno Melenhorst
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  How does sacral modulation work best? Placement and programming techniques to maximize efficacy.

Authors:  Bastian Amend; Mahmoud Khalil; Thomas M Kessler; Karl-Dietrich Sievert
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Number of active electrodes at time of staged tined lead interstim implant does not impact clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Jason P Gilleran; Kim Killinger; Judith Boura; Kenneth M Peters
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 6.  Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  P Abrams; K E Andersson; L Birder; L Brubaker; L Cardozo; C Chapple; A Cottenden; W Davila; D de Ridder; R Dmochowski; M Drake; C Dubeau; C Fry; P Hanno; J Hay Smith; S Herschorn; G Hosker; C Kelleher; H Koelbl; S Khoury; R Madoff; I Milsom; K Moore; D Newman; V Nitti; C Norton; I Nygaard; C Payne; A Smith; D Staskin; S Tekgul; J Thuroff; A Tubaro; D Vodusek; A Wein; J J Wyndaele
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.696

7.  Quality of life is markedly improved in patients with fecal incontinence after sacral nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Ghislain Devroede; Chad Giese; Steven D Wexner; Anders Mellgren; John A Coller; Robert D Madoff; Tracy Hull; Katherine Stromberg; Sudha Iyer
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.091

8.  Is the efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence dependent on the number of active electrode poles achieved during permanent lead insertion?

Authors:  J Duelund-Jakobsen; L Lundby; P-A Lehur; V Wyart; S Laurberg; S Buntzen
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Improving the efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence by alteration of stimulation parameters.

Authors:  T C Dudding; C J Vaizey; A Gibbs; M A Kamm
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Sacral Neuromodulation: Standardized Electrode Placement Technique.

Authors:  Klaus E Matzel; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Charles H Knowles; Paul A Lehur; Arantxa Muñoz-Duyos; Carlo Ratto; Mona B Rydningen; Michael Sørensen; Philip van Kerrebroeck; Stefan de Wachter
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-10-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Video-urodynamics efficacy of sacral neuromodulation for neurogenic bladder guided by three-dimensional imaging CT and C-arm fluoroscopy: a single-center prospective study.

Authors:  Shuaishuai Shan; Wen Zhu; Guoxian Zhang; Qinyong Zhang; Yingyu Che; Jianguo Wen; Qingwei Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.