Literature DB >> 28159117

Fecal incontinence treated by sacral neuromodulation: Long-term follow-up of 325 patients.

Paul T J Janssen1, Sara Z Kuiper1, Laurents P S Stassen1, Nicole D Bouvy1, Stephanie O Breukink1, Jarno Melenhorst2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term results of large patient cohorts with fecal incontinence treated by sacral neuromodulation are limited. This study shows the long-term results after a mean follow-up of 7.1 years in 325 patients with fecal incontinence treated by continuous sacral neuromodulation.
METHODS: All patients with fecal incontinence and eligible for sacral neuromodulation between 2000 and 2015 were evaluated retrospectively. Primary outcome was a decrease in episodes of fecal incontinence, which was defined as involuntary fecal loss at least once per week and documented by a 3 week bowel habit diary. Quality of life was assessed using the Short-Form 36 and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score.
RESULTS: In the study, 374 patients were included for sacral neuromodulation screening and 325 patients (32 male, 9.7%) received permanent, continuous sacral neuromodulation. Mean age was 56.5 years (17-82 years) and mean follow-up was 7.1 years (3.0-183.4 months). In the 325 patients with permanent sacral neuromodulation, fecal incontinence episodes decreased from a mean of 16.1 ± 14.5 to 3.0 ± 3.7 per 3-week period after sacral neuromodulation (P < .001) according to the bowel habit diary. Sacral neuromodulation was removed due to unsatisfactory results in 81 patients. Quality of life (both Short-Form 36 and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Score) showed no significant difference compared with the Dutch population during follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Long-term efficacy of sacral neuromodulation can be maintained in about half (52.7%) of all patients screened with sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence after a mean follow-up of 7.1 years. Importantly, the quality of life of patients with sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence did not differ from the general population.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28159117     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.10.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  9 in total

1.  Sensory brain activation during rectal balloon distention: a pilot study in healthy volunteers to assess safety and feasibility at 1.5T.

Authors:  Roman Assmann; Sanne Rutten; Job van den Hurk; Sadé Laurèl Assmann; Paul Janssen; Nicole Bouvy; Jarno Melenhorst; Stephanie Breukink
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 2.  Diagnosis and Management of Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Arnold Wald
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-03-26

Review 3.  What Is New in Neuromodulation?

Authors:  Courtenay K Moore; Jessica J Rueb; Samir Derisavifard
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Percutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Refractory Fecal Incontinence in Women: The NeurOmodulaTion for Accidental Bowel Leakage Study.

Authors:  Halina M Zyczynski; Lily A Arya; Emily S Lukacz; Holly E Richter; David D Rahn; Vivian W Sung; Anthony G Visco; Amanda Shaffer; J Eric Jelovsek; Rebecca Rogers; Donna Mazloomdoost; Marie G Gantz
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 1.913

5.  Anorectal angle at rest predicting successful sacral nerve stimulation in idiopathic fecal incontinence-a cohort analysis.

Authors:  Cathérine T Kollmann; Elise B Pretzsch; Andreas Kunz; Christoph Isbert; Katica Krajinovic; Joachim Reibetanz; Mia Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Stimulation Parameters for Sacral Neuromodulation on Lower Urinary Tract and Bowel Dysfunction-Related Clinical Outcome: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Roman Assmann; Perla Douven; Jos Kleijnen; Gommert A van Koeveringe; Elbert A Joosten; Jarno Melenhorst; Stephanie O Breukink
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-08-24

7.  The effect of the number of active electrode poles during tined lead placement on long-term efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  R Assmann; S O Breukink; S A P Caubergh; L P S Stassen; S M J van Kuijk; J Melenhorst
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.917

8.  Long-term Outcomes of Sacral Nerve Stimulation in Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions.

Authors:  David Hernández-Hernández; Bárbara Padilla-Fernández; Milagros Castro Romera; Stephany Hess Medler; David Castro-Díaz
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 9.  Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Thomas C Dudding; Paul A Lehur; Michael Sørensen; Stefan Engelberg; Maria Paola Bertapelle; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Karel Everaert; Philip Van Kerrebroeck; Charles H Knowles; Lilli Lundby; Klaus E Matzel; Arantxa Muñoz-Duyos; Mona B Rydningen; Stefan de Wachter
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-07-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.