Literature DB >> 18727721

Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: long-term outcome.

K E Matzel1, P Lux, S Heuer, M Besendörfer, W Zhang.   

Abstract

AIM: The efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) to treat faecal incontinence has been demonstrated in the short- and mid-term. We analysed SNS outcome in the first patients with a permanent neurostimulator in whom follow-up ranges up to 14 years.
METHOD: Of 12 patients who underwent SNS from 1994 to 1999, 9 were eligible for long-term analysis (defined as a minimum of 7 years). In 3 the device had to be removed because of pain or neurological disease. Functional outcome was monitored prospectively by standardized questionnaire. For efficacy, the recorded frequency of incontinent episodes over 2-week periods and the Wexner Score were obtained yearly after implant. Quality of life measures (FIQL scale [QoL]) were introduced in 1998. Stimulation parameter adjustments, battery longevity, and complications were documented.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up in the nine patients was 9.8 years (range 7-14), over which time efficacy persisted. Clinical improvement was significant (baseline vs last follow-up): median percentage of incontinent bowel movements/week 40% (range 9-100) vs 0% (0-60%; P = 0.008), median number of incontinent episodes/week, 9 (range 2-58) vs 0 (0-29; P = 0.012); median Cleveland Clinic Score, 17 (range 12-19) vs 10 (3-14; P < 0.007); QoL improved in all categories. Pulse generator exchange was required in eight of the nine patients after a mean of 7.4 years for battery fatigue (mean 2.1 V). Complications occurred in five of the original 12 and were therapy-related, but not technique-related, in four patients.
CONCLUSION: Sacral nerve stimulation is an effective and safe long-term treatment for faecal incontinence. Clinical outcome is stable over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18727721     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01673.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  26 in total

1.  Sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence in the era of sacral nerve modulation.

Authors:  Donato F Altomare; Michele De Fazio; Ramona Tiziana Giuliani; Giorgio Catalano; Filippa Cuccia
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Sacral nerve stimulation--hidden costs (uncovered).

Authors:  M Zeiton; Sara Faily; James Nicholson; Karen Telford; Abhiram Sharma
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Sacral nerve stimulation in the elderly.

Authors:  Tomas L Griebling
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Invited comment on Hultén et al.: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS), posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) or acupuncture for the treatment for fecal incontinence: a clinical commentary.

Authors:  E Falletto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Office-based management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Vanessa C Costilla; Amy E Foxx-Orenstein; Anita P Mayer; Michael D Crowell
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-07

Review 6.  Neuromodulation for fecal incontinence: an effective surgical intervention.

Authors:  Giuseppe Chiarioni; Olafur S Palsson; Corrado R Asteria; William E Whitehead
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Infection rates in a large investigational trial of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Steven D Wexner; Tracy Hull; Yair Edden; John A Coller; Ghislain Devroede; Richard McCallum; Miranda Chan; Jennifer M Ayscue; Abbas S Shobeiri; David Margolin; Michael England; Howard Kaufman; William J Snape; Ece Mutlu; Heidi Chua; Paul Pettit; Deborah Nagle; Robert D Madoff; Darin R Lerew; Anders Mellgren
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  How does sacral modulation work best? Placement and programming techniques to maximize efficacy.

Authors:  Bastian Amend; Mahmoud Khalil; Thomas M Kessler; Karl-Dietrich Sievert
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Surface and boney landmarks for sacral neuromodulation: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Nicolette E Deveneau; Miriam Greenstein; Abhijit Mahalingashetty; Nicole R Herring; Lioudmila Lipetskaia; Ali Azadi; Donald R Ostergard; Sean L Francis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  [Pelvic floor disorders from the surgeon's viewpoint].

Authors:  T H Schiedeck
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.