| Literature DB >> 32592427 |
Anne Line Stensjøen1, Anders Hommerstad1, Sigrun Halvorsen1,2, Håkan Arheden3, Henrik Engblom3, David Erlinge4, Alf-Inge Larsen5,6, Maria Sejersten Ripa7,8, Peter Clemmensen8,9,10,11, Dan Atar1,2, Trygve S Hall1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: ECG changes after revascularization predicts improved outcome for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Worst lead residual (WLR) ST deviation and resolution of worst lead ST elevation (rST elevation) are simple measures that can be obtained early after PCI. The objective of the current study was to investigate whether simple ECG measures, obtained one hour following PCI, could predict cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived myocardial salvage index (MSI), infarct size (IS), and microvascular obstruction (MVO) in patients with STEMI included in the MITOCARE trial.Entities:
Keywords: ST-elevation myocardial infarction; cardiac magnetic resonance; cardiology; electrocardiography
Year: 2020 PMID: 32592427 PMCID: PMC7679835 DOI: 10.1111/anec.12784
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol ISSN: 1082-720X Impact factor: 1.468
Descriptives in ECG/CMR population and total MITOCARE population
| ECG/CMR population ( | Total study population ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years, mean ( | 61.0 (11.6) | 61.9 (11.6) |
| Male | 83.1% | 83.6% |
| BMI, mean ( | 27.4 (3.5) | 27.7 (4.0) |
| Cardiovascular risk factors | ||
| Hypertension | 26.5% | 29.1% |
| Diabetes | 4.8% | 7.3% |
| Smoking | 44.7% | 46.6% |
| Killip class (grade) | ( | ( |
| 1 | 95.5% | 95.0% |
| 2–4 | 4.5% | 5.0% |
| Infarct location | ||
| Anterior | 41.0% | 39.4% |
| Posterior | 59.0% | 60.6% |
| Culprit vessel | ||
| LAD | 39.8% | 37.6% |
| RCA, dominant or balanced | 47.0% | 49.1% |
| LCx, dominant or balanced | 13.3% | 13.3% |
| Time from pain to balloon inflation, minutes, median (range) |
( 177 (76–453) |
( 178 (47–2855) |
| TIMI grade flow after PCI | ( | ( |
| 0 or 1 | 10.8% | 9.8% |
| 2 or 3 | 89.2% | 90.2% |
| Received study treatment | 56.6% | 51.5% |
Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; CMR, Cardiac magnetic resonance; ECG, Electrocardiogram; TIMI, Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction.
n = 81.
n = 151.
n = 76.
n = 148.
Median values for CMR variables (n = 83)
| CMR variable | Median | Range |
|---|---|---|
| Infarct size (%LV) | 15.0 | 2.3–43.7 |
| Microvascular obstruction (%LV) | 0.033 | 0.0–16.1 |
| Myocardial salvage index (%) | 54.7 | 16.9–89.3 |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) | 48.3 | 18.8–64.5 |
Abbreviations: %LV, Percentage of left ventricle volume; CMR, Cardiac magnetic resonance; Myocardial salvage index, 1‐(Infarct size/Myocardium at risk).
Univariate logistic regression for prediction of CMR variables (n = 83)
| CMR variable | Odds ratio (95% CI) with increasing WLR ST deviation | Odds ratio (95% CI) with increasing rST elevation |
|---|---|---|
| Infarct size (%LV) | 2.2 (1.3–3.8) | 0.3 (0.1–1.0) |
| Microvascular obstruction (%LV) | 2.8 (1.5–5.2) | 0.4 (0.1–1.2) |
| Myocardial salvage index (%) | 0.8 (0.5–1.2) | 2.2 (0.7–7.0) |
Abbreviations: %LV, Percentage of left ventricle volume; CMR, Cardiac magnetic resonance; Myocardial salvage index, 1‐(Infarct size/Myocardium at risk); rST elevation, Resolution of worst lead ST elevation; WLR, Worst lead residual.