Literature DB >> 34951640

Supplementing a blend of magnesium oxide to feedlot cattle: effects on ruminal, physiological, and productive responses.

Eduardo A Colombo1, Reinaldo F Cooke1, Ana Clara R Araújo1,2, Kelsey M Harvey3, Ky G Pohler1, Alice P Brandão1.   

Abstract

This experiment evaluated ruminal, physiological, and productive responses of feedlot cattle consuming a corn-based finishing diet that included different levels of a magnesium oxide (MG) blend. Yearling cattle (58 heifers and 62 steers) were ranked by sex and initial body weight (BW; 407 ± 3.1 kg), and allocated to 4 groups of 30 animals each. Groups were housed in one of four drylot pens (30 × 12 m) equipped with GrowSafe automated feeding systems (Model 6000E, 4 bunks/pen) during the experiment (days -14 to 117). On day 0, groups were randomly assigned to receive a total-mixed ration without (CON; n = 30) or with the inclusion (as-fed basis) of MG at 0.25% (MG25; n = 30), 0.50% (MG50; n = 30), or 0.75% (MG75; n = 30) until slaughter on day 118. Individual feed intake was recorded daily, and BW was recorded every 14 d and prior to slaughter (day 117). Blood samples were collected on days 0, 28, 56, 84, and 112, and hair samples were collected on days 0, 56, and 112 from the tail-switch. On day 42, eight rumen-cannulated steers (BW = 492 ± 8.0 kg) were housed with yearling cattle (1 pair/pen). Pairs rotated among groups every 14 d, resulting in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design (n = 8/treatment; days 42 to 98). Rumen pH was measured on days 7 and 14 of each period (0800, 1200, 1600, and 2000 h). Orthogonal contrasts were used to determine if inclusion of MG (0%, 0.25%, 0.50%, or 0.75% of the diet) yielded linear or quadratic effects, and to explore overall effect of MG supplementation (CON vs. MG25 + MG50 + MG75). No treatment differences were noted (P ≥ 0.31) for BW gain, feed intake, or feed efficiency. Cattle supplemented with MG tended to have less carcass marbling (P = 0.07) compared with CON. Inclusion of MG linearly increased (P < 0.01) mean plasma concentrations of magnesium and tended to linearly decrease (P = 0.09) mean plasma concentrations of haptoglobin. Cattle supplemented with MG had greater (P < 0.01) mean plasma concentrations of cortisol compared with CON. Hair cortisol concentration did not differ between treatments on day 56 (P ≥ 0.25) and linearly decreased (P < 0.01) with MG inclusion on day 112 (treatment × day; P = 0.02). Inclusion of MG linearly increased (P = 0.03) mean rumen pH, but these outcomes were mostly noted during the last two sampling of the day (treatment × hour; P = 0.02). Collectively, supplemental MG was effective in controlling rumen pH in cattle receiving a corn-based finishing diet, but without improvements in feedlot performance and carcass merit.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acidosis; feedlot cattle; magnesium oxide; physiology; rumen

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34951640      PMCID: PMC8919815          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  52 in total

1.  Subacute ruminal acidosis induces ruminal lipopolysaccharide endotoxin release and triggers an inflammatory response.

Authors:  G N Gozho; J C Plaizier; D O Krause; A D Kennedy; K M Wittenberg
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Alfalfa pellet-induced subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows increases bacterial endotoxin in the rumen without causing inflammation.

Authors:  E Khafipour; D O Krause; J C Plaizier
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  High concentrate-induced subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) increases plasma acute phase proteins (APPs) and cortisol in goats.

Authors:  Y Y Jia; S Q Wang; Y D Ni; Y S Zhang; S Zhuang; X Z Shen
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Diagnosis and Management of Rumen Acidosis and Bloat in Feedlots.

Authors:  Nathan F Meyer; Tony C Bryant
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.357

5.  Endocrine and metabolic changes during altered growth rates in beef cattle.

Authors:  M A Ellenberger; D E Johnson; G E Carstens; K L Hossner; M D Holland; T M Nett; C F Nockels
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  The effect of buffering dairy cow diets with limestone, calcareous marine algae, or sodium bicarbonate on ruminal pH profiles, production responses, and rumen fermentation.

Authors:  C W Cruywagen; S Taylor; M M Beya; T Calitz
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 7.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Clinical Rumen Acidosis.

Authors:  Emily Snyder; Brent Credille
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2017-07-23       Impact factor: 3.357

8.  Supplementing organic-complexed or inorganic Co, Cu, Mn, and Zn to beef cows during gestation: postweaning responses of offspring reared as replacement heifers or feeder cattle.

Authors:  Kelsey M Harvey; Reinaldo F Cooke; Eduardo A Colombo; Bruna Rett; Osvaldo A de Sousa; Lorin M Harvey; Jason R Russell; Ky G Pohler; Alice P Brandão
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Long-term magnesium supplementation improves glucocorticoid metabolism: A post-hoc analysis of an intervention trial.

Authors:  Joëlle C Schutten; Peter J Joris; Isidor Minović; Adrian Post; André P van Beek; Martin H de Borst; Ronald P Mensink; Stephan J L Bakker
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.478

10.  Effect of induced ruminal acidosis on blood variables in heifers.

Authors:  Giorgio Marchesini; Roberta De Nardi; Matteo Gianesella; Anna-Lisa Stefani; Massimo Morgante; Antonio Barberio; Igino Andrighetto; Severino Segato
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.