Literature DB >> 10202089

To split behaviour into bouts, log-transform the intervals.

.   

Abstract

Analysis of behaviour that is displayed in bouts depends crucially on quantitative estimates of bout criteria, that is, the lengths of the shortest intervals between bouts. Current methods estimate bout criteria by modelling the log-transformed (cumulative) frequency distributions of intervals between events. For analysis of feeding behaviour, these models will not result in biologically meaningful quantitative estimates (Tolkamp et al. 1998, Journal of Theoretical Biology194, 235-250). We proposed a method that models the frequency distribution of log-transformed interval lengths instead. Applying this method to a single data set showed that the log-transformed lengths of intervals between feeding events were distributed as two Gaussians. Here we test this model using a data set of 35 171 intervals between feeding that was obtained during an experiment with 38 cows in three dietary treatment groups. No meaningful bout criterion could be obtained for some individuals, which casts doubt on the general validity of the proposed model. Addition of a third log-normal improved the fit of the model and we hypothesized that this third population represents intervals including drinking. In a second experiment, we found the measurements to be consistent with this hypothesis. We obtained meaningful meal criteria for all individuals by fitting either a double, or a triple, log-normal model to the frequency distributions of the lengths of intervals between feeding. These log-normal models appear to be not only more biologically meaningful than log (cumulative) frequency models but also far more flexible. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10202089     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  31 in total

1.  Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: effects of relative reinforcement and schedule type.

Authors:  R L Shull; S T Gaynor; J A Grimes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Bouts of responding from variable-interval reinforcement of lever pressing by rats.

Authors:  Richard L Shull; Julie A Grimes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Bouts of responding: the relation between bout rate and the rate of variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  Richard L Shull; Julie A Grimes; J Adam Bennett
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The effect of changes in criterion value on differential reinforcement of low rate schedule performance.

Authors:  Matthew J Pizzo; Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Pamela J Blundell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Separate mechanisms for development and performance of compulsive checking in the quinpirole sensitization rat model of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

Authors:  Mark C Tucci; Anna Dvorkin-Gheva; Renee Sharma; Leena Taji; Paul Cheon; John Peel; Ashley Kirk; Henry Szechtman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Dynamics of temporal discrimination.

Authors:  Paulo Guilhardi; Russell M Church
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  The pattern of responding after extensive extinction.

Authors:  Paulo Guilhardi; Russell M Church
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Tracking of the expected time to reinforcement in temporal conditioning procedures.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Russell M Church
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Characterization of feeding behavior traits in steers with divergent residual feed intake consuming a high-concentrate diet.

Authors:  Ira L Parsons; Jocelyn R Johnson; William C Kayser; Luis O Tedeschi; Gordon E Carstens
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Intermittent access to preferred food reduces the reinforcing efficacy of chow in rats.

Authors:  Pietro Cottone; Valentina Sabino; Luca Steardo; Eric P Zorrilla
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.619

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.