| Literature DB >> 32588698 |
Jing Jin1,2,3,4, Qian Sun2,3,4, Zan Wu5, Kun Liu2,3,4, Zhengyu Song6, Li Su2,3,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the differences in amino acid metabolism in aqueous humor of patients with cataract, according to diabetes status, using a 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance approach.Entities:
Keywords: Aqueous humor; amino acids; cataract formation; diabetes; glucose; lysine; metabolite profiling; transfer RNA; tyrosine; valine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32588698 PMCID: PMC7323282 DOI: 10.1177/0300060520934658
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with cataract, according to diabetes status.
| Total (n = 16) | Cataract alone (n = 8) | Cataract with diabetes (n = 8) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), mean ±standard deviation | 71.94±4.67 | 72.13±4.32 | 71.75±5.28 | 0.88 |
| Sex (male), % | 50 | 50 | 50 | 1.00 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2), median | 23.45 | 22.96 | 23.93 | 0.43 |
| Hypertension, n | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.02 |
| Diabetes mellitus (years), mean ±standard deviation | 3.19 ±3.90 | 0 | 6.37±3.01 | 0.00 |
| Average HbA1c (%), mean (±standard deviation) | 6.09 ±1.01 | 5.16 ± 0.24 | 7.03±0.38 | 0.00 |
Figure 1.Metabolite profiling analyses of patients with cataract, according to diabetes status. (a) principal component analysis scatter plot, (b) partial least squares discriminant analysis scatter plot, (c) orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analysis scatter plot, and d) validation plot. In panel d, Q2 and R2 represent quality of fitted model. Q2 (cum) value greater than all fitted Q2 values in permutated tests indicated stable models with good fitness and excellent prediction abilities.
DC, patients with cataract and diabetes; NC, patients with cataract alone; R2, variation explained by fitted model; Q2, cross-validated explained variation in 7-round cross validation and permutation tests.
Differences in metabolite integrals in aqueous humor of patients with cataract, according to diabetes status.
| Metabolite | % change, DC vs. NC | |r| | VIP | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valine | −19.8 | 0.45 | 1.37 | 0.02 |
| Glucose | +70.6 | 0.56 | 1.47 | 0.02 |
| Lysine | −29.9 | 0.53 | 1.29 | 0.03 |
| Tyrosine | −10.9 | 0.61 | 1.54 | 0.03 |
DC, patients with cataract and diabetes; NC, patients with cataract alone; VIP, variable importance in the projection.
Figure 2.Pathway impact analysis of patients with cataract, according to diabetes status, by Metaboanalyst 3.0.
DC, patients with cataract and diabetes; NC, patients with cataract alone.
Pathway analysis of patients with cataract, according to diabetes status.
| Pathway | Raw p | −log (p) | Holm p | FDR | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis | 0.00 | 9.08 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| Biotin metabolism | 0.02 | 4.01 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 |
| Thiamine metabolism | 0.04 | 3.24 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 |
| Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis | 0.04 | 3.12 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 |
| Phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis | 0.04 | 3.12 | 1 | 0.38 | 0.01 |
| Valine, leucine, and isoleucine biosynthesis | 0.04 | 3.12 | 1 | 0.38 | 0.01 |
| Glycolysis or gluconeogenesis | 0.05 | 2.98 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 |
| Pentose phosphate pathway | 0.05 | 2.95 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 |
| Lysine biosynthesis | 0.05 | 2.95 | 1 | 0.38 | 0.10 |
| Propanoate metabolism | 0.05 | 2.87 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 |
| Ubiquinone and other terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis | 0.06 | 2.83 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 |
| Nitrogen metabolism | 0.06 | 2.76 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 |
| Valine, leucine, and isoleucine degradation | 0.06 | 2.74 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 |
| Galactose metabolism | 0.07 | 2.71 | 1 | 0.38 | 0.01 |
| Phenylalanine metabolism | 0.07 | 2.62 | 1 | 0.38 | 0 |
| Lysine degradation | 0.08 | 2.58 | 1 | 0.38 | 0.15 |
| Starch and sucrose metabolism | 0.08 | 2.52 | 1 | 0.38 | 0.02 |
| Tyrosine metabolism | 0.12 | 2.12 | 1 | 0.54 | 0.05 |
| Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism | 0.14 | 1.98 | 1 | 0.58 | 0 |
DC, patients with cataract and diabetes; NC, patients with cataract alone.
Figure 3.Influence of metabolites on citric acid cycle in aqueous humor of patients with cataract and diabetes.
CoA, coenzyme A.