| Literature DB >> 32587311 |
Angela Armento1, Sabina Honisch1, Vasiliki Panagiotakopoulou2,3, Inga Sonntag1, Anke Jacob1, Sylvia Bolz1, Ellen Kilger1, Michela Deleidi2,3, Simon Clark1, Marius Ueffing4.
Abstract
Polymorphisms in the Complement Factor H (CFH) gene, coding for the Factor H protein (FH), can increase the risk for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). AMD-associated CFH risk variants, Y402H in particular, impair FH function leading to complement overactivation. Whether this alone suffices to trigger AMD pathogenesis remains unclear. In AMD, retinal homeostasis is compromised due to the dysfunction of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells. To investigate the impact of endogenous FH loss on RPE cell balance, we silenced CFH in human hTERT-RPE1 cells. FH reduction led to accumulation of C3, at both RNA and protein level and increased RPE vulnerability toward oxidative stress. Mild hydrogen-peroxide exposure in combination with CFH knock-down led to a reduction of glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration, paralleled by an increase in lipid peroxidation, which is a key aspect of AMD pathogenesis. In parallel, cell viability was decreased. The perturbations of energy metabolism were accompanied by transcriptional deregulation of several glucose metabolism genes as well as genes modulating mitochondrial stability. Our data suggest that endogenously produced FH contributes to transcriptional and metabolic homeostasis and protects RPE cells from oxidative stress, highlighting a novel role of FH in AMD pathogenesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32587311 PMCID: PMC7316856 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-67292-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1FH reduction leads to extracellular C3/C3b accumulation. hTERT-RPE1 cells were seeded, left to attach overnight and silenced for 24 hours with negative control (siNeg) or CFH specific (siCFH) siRNA. Cells were exposed for 90 minutes to 200 µM H2O2 or PBS and cell pellets and cell culture supernatants were collected for further processing after 48 hours. (a) Monitoring of CFH expression by qRT-PCR analyses in silencing negative control (siNeg) and specific CFH silenced (siCFH) hTERT-RPE1 cells. Data are normalized to the housekeeping gene PRPL0 using Δ ΔCt methods. SEM is shown, n = 3. (b) Western blot analyses of FH protein levels in cell culture supernatants of hTERT-RPE1 in the same conditions as (a). Quantification of signal density of 4 independent experiments is shown. (c) Monitoring of C3 expression by qRT-PCR analyses in silencing negative control (siNeg) and specific CFH silenced (siCFH) hTERT-RPE1 cells. Data are normalized to housekeeping gene PRPL0 using Δ ΔCt method. SEM is shown, n = 4. (d) Western blot analyses of C3 α-chain and β-chain protein levels in cell culture supernatants of hTERT-RPE1 cells. Quantification of signal density of 3 independent experiments is shown. (e) C3/C3b ELISA analyses of cell culture supernatants of hTERT-RPE1 cells. SEM is shown, n = 4. Western Blot images were cropped, and full-length blots are presented in Supplementary Fig. S5. Significance was assessed by Student’s t-test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 2FH loss increases vulnerability of RPE cells toward oxidative stress. hTERT-RPE1 cells were seeded, left to attach overnight and silenced for 24 hours with negative control (siNeg) or CFH specific (siCFH) siRNA. Cells were exposed for 90 minutes to 200 µM H2O2 or PBS and specific dyes were added after 48 hours. (a) Lipid peroxidation levels were assessed via BODIPY® 581⁄591 C11 fluorescent dye. Fluorescence shift was measured at ~590 nm and ~510 nm. Data are shown as ratio oxidized/reduced lipids, higher bars indicate higher lipid peroxidation levels. SEM is shown, n = 7. (b) Cytotoxicity levels were assessed by cell-impermeable fluorescent dye bis-AAF-R110. SEM is shown, n = 5. (c) Viability was assessed by cell-permeable fluorescent dye GF-AFC (glycyl-phenylalanyl-aminofluorocoumarin). SEM is shown, n = 5. (d) Following addition of purified FH (1 µl/ml), viability was assessed by cell-permeable fluorescent dye GF-AFC (glycyl-phenylalanyl-aminofluorocoumarin). SEM is shown, n = 3. A.U. arbitrary units. Significance was assessed by Student’s t-test (single effect) and two-way ANOVA (combined effects) as described in the methods section. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 3FH loss impairs glycolysis in RPE cells. (a) Schematic representation of glycolysis and steps targeted during Seahorse analyses (1,2,3). (b) hTERT-RPE1 cells were seeded, let attach overnight and silenced for 24 hours with negative control (siNeg) or CFH specific (siCFH) siRNA. 30,000 cells were transferred to Seahorse plates overnight and pre-treated for 90 minutes with 200 µM H2O2 or PBS. Curves show extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) measured after 48 hours. SEM is shown, n = 4–8. Arrows indicate injection of glucose (1), oligomycin (2) and 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG,3). (c–e) Parameters of glycolytic function are calculated from data shown in (b) and are expressed as total values for the 3 measurements (15 minutes). Basal glycolysis (c), glycolytic capacity (d) and glycolytic reserve (e). Significance was assessed by Student’s t-test (single effect) and two-way ANOVA (combined effects) as described in the methods section. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 4FH modulates glucose uptake and expression of glucose metabolism genes. hTERT-RPE1 cells were seeded, let attach overnight and silenced for 24 hours with negative control (siNeg) or CFH specific (siCFH) siRNA. Cells were exposed for 90 minutes to 200 µM H2O2 or PBS. (a) Glucose uptake was measured 48 hours after H2O2 pre-treatment in siNeg control cells and in siCFH cells. SEM is shown, n = 3. (b) gene expression analysis by qRT-PCR of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1/SLC2A1) and glycolysis enzyme gene lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA). SEM is shown, n = 3. Data are normalized to housekeeping gene PRPL0 using Δ ΔCt method. Significance was assessed by Student’s t-test (single effect) and two-way ANOVA (combined effects) as described in the methods section *p < 0.05.
Figure 5FH loss impairs mitochondrial respiration in RPE cells. (a) Schematic representation of oxidative phosphorylation chain and targeted steps during Seahorse analyses (1,2,3) (b) hTERT-RPE1 cells were seeded, let attach overnight and silenced for 24 hours with negative control (siNeg) or CFH specific (siCFH) siRNA. 30.000 cells were transferred to seahorse plates overnight and pre-treated for 90 minutes with 200 µM H2O2 or PBS. Curves show oxygen consumption rate (OCR) measured after 48 hours in hTERT-RPE1. SEM is shown, n = 4–8. Arrows indicate injection of oligomycin (1), FCCP (2) and antimycin and rotenone (3). (c–e) Parameters of mitochondrial function are calculated from data shown in (b) and are expressed as total values for the 3 measurements (15 minutes). Basal respiration (c), maximal respiration (d) and reserve respiratory capacity (e). Significance was assessed by Student’s t-test (single effect) and two-way ANOVA (combined effects) as described in the methods section *p < 0.05.
Figure 6FH modulates expression of mitophagy and mitochondria dynamics genes. hTERT-RPE1 cells were seeded, left to attach overnight and silenced for 24 hours with negative control (siNeg) or CFH specific (siCFH) siRNA. Cells were exposed for 90 minutes to 200 µM H2O2 or PBS and RNA was collected after 48 hours. (a) gene expression analysis by qRT-PCR of genes involved in mitophagy processes: PTEN Induced Kinase 1 (PINK1) and E3 Ubiquitin-Protein Ligase Parkin (PARKIN) SEM is shown, n = 3. (b) Gene expression analysis by qRT-PCR of genes involved in mitochondria dynamics: OPA1 Mitochondrial Dynamin Like GTPase (OPA1) and Dynamin-Related Protein 1 (DRP1). SEM is shown, n = 3. Data are normalized to housekeeping gene PRPL0 using Δ ΔCt method. Significance was assessed by Student’s t-test *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 7Schematic representation of RPE cell behaviour in presence (left panel) and absence (right panel) of Factor H (FH).
List of qPCR primers.
| gene name | fwd | rev |
|---|---|---|
| ND4 | 5′- CCT CGT AGT AAC AGC CAT TCT C -3 | 5´- CTG TGA GTG CGT TCG TAG TT -3´ |
| COX4 | 5′- TGT TGG CTA CCA GGG TAT TTA G -3 | 5′- CTT CGC TCT TCA CAA CAC TTT C -3 |
| ATP6 | 5′- CAC TAA AGG ACG AAC CTG ATC TC -3 | 5′- GAT AGT TGG GTG GTT GGT GTA A -3 |
| OPA1 | 5′- GAG GAC AGC TTG AGG GTT ATT C -3 | 5′- CTG CAG AGC CTC TTC CAT AAA -3 |
| PINK1 | 5′- GGC TTG GCA AAT GGA AGA AC -3 | 5′- CTC AGT CCA GCC TCA TCT ACT A -3 |
| PARKIN | 5′- CCA CAC TAC GCA GAA GAG AAA -3′ | 5′- GAG ACT CAT GCC CTC AGT TAT G -3′ |
| DRP1 | 5′- GAG CTT CTT TGC AGC CTT TG -3′ | 5′- CCA GAA TTG GAA GGG CTA TGT -3 |
| LDHA | 5′- ACC CAG ATT TAG GGA CTG ATA AAG -3′ | 5′- CCA ATA GCC CAG GAT GTG TAG -3 |
| SLC2A1 | 5′- GAT GGG AGT GAG ACA GAA GTA AG -3 | 5′- CAC TGA TGA GAG GTA CGT GTA AG -3′ |
| PPARGC1A | 5′- AGA GCG CCG TGT GAT TTA T -3′ | 5′- CTC CAT CAT CCC GCA GAT TTA -3′ |
| NFE2L2 | 5′- TGA TTC TGA CTC CGG CAT TT -3′ | 5′- GCC AAG TAG TGT GTC TCC ATA G -3 |
| PRDX3 | 5′- AGC CAT CTT GCC TGG ATA AAT A -3′ | 5′- GTA GTC TCG GGA AAT CTG CTT AG -3′ |
| CAT | 5′- CTG GAG CAC AGC ATC CAA TA -3′ | 5′- TCA TTC AGC ACG TTC ACA TAG A -3′ |
| GPX1 | 5′- CAT CAG GAG AAC GCC AAG AA -3′ | 5′- GCA CTT CTC GAA GAG CAT GA -3′ |
| BEST1 | 5′- CTC AGT GTG GAC ACC TGT ATG -3 | 5′- CCC AAC TAG ACA AGT CAG GAA G -3 |
| RPE65 | 5′- GGA CTT GGC TTG AAT CAC TTT G -3′ | 5′- AAG ATG GGT TCT GAT GGG TAT G -3′ |
| PRPLO | 5′- GGA GAA ACT GCT GCC TCA TAT C -3′ | 5′- CAG CAG CTG GCA CCT TAT T -3′ |
| C3 | 5′- ACG GCC TTT GTT CTC ATC TC -3′ | 5′- CAA GGA AGT CTC CTG CTT TAG T -3′ |
| 5′- CTG ATC GCA AGA AAG ACC AGT A -3′ | 5′- TGG TAG CAC TGA ACG GAA TTA G -3′ |