Literature DB >> 32586967

Variable Refocusing Flip Angle Single-Shot Imaging for Sedation-Free Fast Brain MRI.

R Jabarkheel1, E Tong2, E H Lee3, T M Cullen4, U Yousaf4, A M Loening2, V Taviani2, M Iv2, G A Grant5, S J Holdsworth6, S S Vasanawala4, K W Yeom7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Conventional single-shot FSE commonly used for fast MRI may be suboptimal for brain evaluation due to poor image contrast, SNR, or image blurring. We investigated the clinical performance of variable refocusing flip angle single-shot FSE, a variation of single-shot FSE with lower radiofrequency energy deposition and potentially faster acquisition time, as an alternative approach to fast brain MR imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively compared half-Fourier single-shot FSE with half- and full-Fourier variable refocusing flip angle single-shot FSE in 30 children. Three readers reviewed images for motion artifacts, image sharpness at the brain-fluid interface, and image sharpness/tissue contrast at gray-white differentiation on a modified 5-point Likert scale. Two readers also evaluated full-Fourier variable refocusing flip angle single-shot FSE against T2-FSE for brain lesion detectability in 38 children.
RESULTS: Variable refocusing flip angle single-shot FSE sequences showed more motion artifacts (P < .001). Variable refocusing flip angle single-shot FSE sequences scored higher regarding image sharpness at brain-fluid interfaces (P < .001) and gray-white differentiation (P < .001). Acquisition times for half- and full-Fourier variable refocusing flip angle single-shot FSE were faster than for single-shot FSE (P < .001) with a 53% and 47% reduction, respectively. Intermodality agreement between full-Fourier variable refocusing flip angle single-shot FSE and T2-FSE findings was near-perfect (κ = 0.90, κ = 0.95), with an 8% discordance rate for ground truth lesion detection.
CONCLUSIONS: Variable refocusing flip angle single-shot FSE achieved 2× faster scan times than single-shot FSE with improved image sharpness at brain-fluid interfaces and gray-white differentiation. Such improvements are likely attributed to a combination of improved contrast, spatial resolution, SNR, and reduced T2-decay associated with blurring. While variable refocusing flip angle single-shot FSE may be a useful alternative to single-shot FSE and, potentially, T2-FSE when faster scan times are desired, motion artifacts were more common in variable refocusing flip angle single-shot FSE, and, thus, they remain an important consideration before clinical implementation.
© 2020 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32586967      PMCID: PMC7357630          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  26 in total

1.  Multiecho sequences with variable refocusing flip angles: optimization of signal behavior using smooth transitions between pseudo steady states (TRAPS).

Authors:  Juergen Hennig; Matthias Weigel; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Fast spin echo sequences with very long echo trains: design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical T2 contrast.

Authors:  Reed F Busse; Hari Hariharan; Anthony Vu; Jean H Brittain
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  GRASE (gradient- and spin-echo) MR of the brain.

Authors:  D T Rockwell; E R Melhem; R G Bhatia
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.

Authors:  D Brenner; C Elliston; E Hall; W Berdon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Turbo gradient-spin-echo (GRASE): first clinical experiences with a fast T2-weighted sequence in MRI of the brain.

Authors:  F Fellner; R Schmitt; J Trenkler; C Fellner; H Böhm-Jurkovic
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Performance of PROPELLER relative to standard FSE T2-weighted imaging in pediatric brain MRI.

Authors:  A Talia Vertinsky; Erika Rubesova; Michael V Krasnokutsky; Sabine Bammer; Jarrett Rosenberg; Allan White; Patrick D Barnes; Roland Bammer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-08-11

7.  Strengthening the argument for rapid brain MR imaging: estimation of reduction in lifetime attributable risk of developing fatal cancer in children with shunted hydrocephalus by instituting a rapid brain MR imaging protocol in lieu of Head CT.

Authors:  K Koral; T Blackburn; A A Bailey; K M Koral; J Anderson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Comparison of HASTE and segmented-HASTE sequences with a T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence in the screening evaluation of the brain.

Authors:  T Sugahara; Y Korogi; T Hirai; S Hamatake; I Ikushima; Y Shigematu; M Takahashi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Fast-sequence MRI studies for surveillance imaging in pediatric hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Daxa M Patel; R Shane Tubbs; Gigi Pate; James M Johnston; Jeffrey P Blount
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Effects of refocusing flip angle modulation and view ordering in 3D fast spin echo.

Authors:  Reed F Busse; Anja C S Brau; Anthony Vu; Charles R Michelich; Ersin Bayram; Richard Kijowski; Scott B Reeder; Howard A Rowley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.