| Literature DB >> 32586956 |
Ryan Greenway1, Nick Barts1, Chathurika Henpita2, Anthony P Brown3, Lenin Arias Rodriguez4, Carlos M Rodríguez Peña5, Sabine Arndt6, Gigi Y Lau7, Michael P Murphy6, Lei Wu8, Dingbo Lin8, Michael Tobler9, Joanna L Kelley10, Jennifer H Shaw11.
Abstract
Extreme environments test the limits of life; yet, some organisms thrive in harsh conditions. Extremophile lineages inspire questions about how organisms can tolerate physiochemical stressors and whether the repeated colonization of extreme environments is facilitated by predictable and repeatable evolutionary innovations. We identified the mechanistic basis underlying convergent evolution of tolerance to hydrogen sulfide (H2S)-a toxicant that impairs mitochondrial function-across evolutionarily independent lineages of a fish (Poecilia mexicana, Poeciliidae) from H2S-rich springs. Using comparative biochemical and physiological analyses, we found that mitochondrial function is maintained in the presence of H2S in sulfide spring P. mexicana but not ancestral lineages from nonsulfidic habitats due to convergent adaptations in the primary toxicity target and a major detoxification enzyme. Genome-wide local ancestry analyses indicated that convergent evolution of increased H2S tolerance in different populations is likely caused by a combination of selection on standing genetic variation and de novo mutations. On a macroevolutionary scale, H2S tolerance in 10 independent lineages of sulfide spring fishes across multiple genera of Poeciliidae is correlated with the convergent modification and expression changes in genes associated with H2S toxicity and detoxification. Our results demonstrate that the modification of highly conserved physiological pathways associated with essential mitochondrial processes mediates tolerance to physiochemical stress. In addition, the same pathways, genes, and-in some instances-codons are implicated in H2S adaptation in lineages that span 40 million years of evolution.Entities:
Keywords: adaptive evolution; comparative physiology; ecological genomics; hydrogen sulfide; phylogenetic comparative analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32586956 PMCID: PMC7368198 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2004223117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.(A) Physiological pathways associated with H2S toxicity and detoxification are located in the inner mitochondrial membrane. H2S inhibits OxPhos (orange enzymes, encoded by genes in the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes) by binding to cytochrome c oxidase (COX) (Complex IV). H2S can be detoxified through sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase (SQR) (green enzyme, encoded by a gene in the nuclear genome) and additional enzymes (indicated by the asterisk). (B) Relative activity of COX upon H2S exposure, which was primarily explained by an interaction between habitat type of origin and ambient H2S concentration (). (C) Activity of SQR as a function of H2S concentration, which was explained by an interaction between habitat type of origin and H2S concentration (). (D) Relative change in mitochondrial H2S concentrations in the liver of live fish exposed to different levels of environmental H2S. Variation in mitochondrial H2S levels were explained by habitat type of origin and exogenous H2S concentration (). (E) Relative spare respiratory capacity of isolated liver mitochondria at different levels of H2S. The interaction between habitat type of origin and drainage of origin best explained variation in spare respiratory capacity (). For all graphs, yellow colors denote P. mexicana from H2S-rich habitats, and blue denotes P. mexicana from nonsulfidic habitats. Symbols stand for populations from different river drainages (■: Tac; ▲: Puy; ●: Pich; see ).
Fig. 2.(A) Phylogeny of different populations in the P. mexicana species complex (with P. reticulata as an outgroup) based on genome-wide SNPs. Colors indicate sulfidic (yellow) and nonsulfidic (blue) lineages. (B) Local ancestry patterns around genes encoding two enzymes involved in H2S detoxification, SQR and ETHE1. Gray bars represent the local ancestry pattern (cactus) associated with each region. Unrooted trees represent local ancestry relationships with sulfidic lineages colored in yellow and nonsulfidic lineages colored in blue. Cacti 10 and 19 show clear clustering by ecotype. In cacti 1, 5, and 12, four of five sulfidic individuals cluster together.
Fig. 3.(A) Multidimensional scaling (MDS) plot of overall gene expression patterns across 20 lineages of poeciliid fishes. Black lines represent phylogenetic relationships among lineages; color represents habitat type of origin (yellow: sulfidic; blue: nonsulfidic). (B) Expression variation of 186 genes with evidence for convergent expression shifts (z-transformed fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads). Colors represent expression levels as indicated by the scale. The neighbor-joining tree on the left groups lineages based on expression similarity. The cladogram on the right shows the phylogenetic relationship among lineages. Pictures on the side are examples of sulfide spring fishes (from top to bottom): Xiphophorus hellerii, Pseudoxiphophorus bimaculatus, Gambusia holbrooki, G. sexradiata, G. eurystoma, Poecilia latipinna, P. sulphuraria (Pich), P. mexicana (Tac), P. mexicana (Puy), and Limia sulphurophila. (C) MDS plot of the expression of 186 genes with evidence for convergent expression shifts. (D) Boxplots with mean expression levels of different components of the SQR pathway across lineages from sulfidic (yellow) and nonsulfidic (blue) habitats.
Fig. 4.Amino acid differences in COX1 and COX3 between lineages from sulfidic (yellow) and nonsulfidic (blue) habitats. Derived amino acids are shown in red. Bold letters indicate codons with convergent amino acid substitutions in different clades (separated by black horizontal lines) of sulfide spring fishes. Numbers above represent the position in the amino acid sequence.