| Literature DB >> 33855227 |
Gyanendra Bahadur Chand1, Sushant Kumar1, Gajendra Kumar Azad1.
Abstract
The population of catfish, Clarias batrachus has substantially diminished in various countries and studies show that another related species Clarias gariepinus is replacing it. The better adaptability and survivability of C. gariepinus over C. batrachus could be attributed to the metabolic differences between these two species, which is primarily regulated by mitochondrial activities. To understand the reasons behind this phenomenon, we performed in silico analyses to decipher the differences between the proteins encoded by the mitochondrial genome of these two related species. Our analysis revealed that out of thirteen, twelve proteins encoded by the mitochondrial genome of these two species have substantial variations between them. We characterised these variations by analysing their effect on secondary structure, intrinsic disorder predisposition, and functional impact on protein and stability parameters. Our data show that most of the parameters are changing between these two closely related species. Altogether, we demonstrate the molecular insights into the mitochondrial genome-encoded proteins of these two species and predict their effect on protein function and stability that might be helping C. gariepinus to gain survivability better than the C. batrachus.Entities:
Keywords: Clarias batrachus; Clarias gariepinus; Mitochondrial genome; Protein stability; Variations
Year: 2021 PMID: 33855227 PMCID: PMC8024883 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2021.100985
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochem Biophys Rep ISSN: 2405-5808
List of complete mitochondrial genome sequences of C. batrachus and C. gariepinus reported worldwide till August 2020.
| S. No. | Species | Accession | Submission date | Reported from | Authors | Institute |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KY767672 | 14-MAR-2017 | China | Ma,A. et al., | College of Fisheries, Henan normal University, Henan, 453007, China | |
| 2 | NC_027661 | 01-JUN-2015 | China | Han,C. et al., | College of Life Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong 510000, China | |
| 3 | KT001082 | 01-JUN-2015 | China | Han,C. et al., | College of Life Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong 510000, China | |
| 4 | KT809508 | 22-SEP-2015 | Hungary | Kovacs, B. et al., | Department of Aquaculture, Szent Istvan University, Godollo 2100, Hungary | |
| 5 | KM259918 | 01-AUG-2014 | India | Kushwaha,B. et al., | Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, | |
| 6 | KC572134 | 01-FEB-2013 | India | Mohindra,V. et al., | Fish Conservation Division, National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, UP, 226002, India | |
| 7 | NC_023923 | 01-FEB-2013 | India | Mohindra,V. et al., | Fish Conservation Division, National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, UP 226002, India |
List of protein Accession Number used in this study.
| S. No. | Protein | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 | AUX80750.1 | YP_009160664.1 |
| 2 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 | AUX80751.1 | YP_009160665.1 |
| 3 | cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 | AUX80752.1 | YP_009160666.1 |
| 4 | cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2 | AUX80753.1 | YP_009160667.1 |
| 5 | ATP synthase F0 subunit 8 | AUX80754.1 | YP_009160668.1 |
| 6 | ATP synthase F0 subunit 6 | AUX80755.1 | YP_009160669.1 |
| 7 | cytochrome c oxidase subunit 3 | AUX80756.1 | YP_009160670.1 |
| 8 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3 | AUX80757.1 | YP_009160671.1 |
| 9 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4L | AUX80758.1 | YP_009160672.1 |
| 10 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4 | AUX80759.1 | YP_009160673.1 |
| 11 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 | AUX80760.1 | YP_009160674.1 |
| 12 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 6 | AUX80761.1 | YP_009160675.1 |
| 13 | cytochrome b | AUX80762.1 | YP_009160676.1 |
Summary of variations observed between C. batrachus and C. gariepinus. The data was obtained by comparing the mitochondrial protein sequences of C. gariepinus and C. batrachus.
| S. No | Mitochondrial genome encoded Proteins | Total Protein length | Number of point mutations observed in | % mutant residues in |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 | 324 | 10 | 3.08 |
| 2 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 | 348 | 22 | 6.32 |
| 3 | Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I | 516 | 5 | 0.96 |
| 4 | Cytochrome c oxidase subunit II | 230 | 5 | 2.12 |
| 5 | ATP synthase F0 subunit 8 | 55 | 3 | 5.45 |
| 6 | ATP synthase F0 subunit 6 | 227 | 2 | 0.88 |
| 7 | Cytochrome c oxidase subunit III | 261 | 1 | 0.38 |
| 8 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 3 | 116 | 9 | 7.75 |
| 9 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4L | 98 | No mutation | 0 |
| 10 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4 | 460 | 11 | 2.39 |
| 11 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 | 608 | 29 | 4.7 |
| 12 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 6 | 172 | Five point mutations and multiple mutations from residue 112-141 | – |
| 13 | Cytochrome b | 379 | 7 | 1.84 |
Fig. 1The sequence alignment of the NADH Dehydrogenase subunits encoded by mitochondrial genome of C. batrachus and C. gariepinus reported from China. (A–F) The amino acid substitutions are highlighted in the schematics of individual proteins.
Fig. 2The sequence alignment of the Cytochrome C Oxidase subunits, ATP Synthase F0 subunits and Cytochrome b encoded by mitochondrial genome of C. batrachus and C. gariepinus reported from China. (A–F) The amino acid substitutions are highlighted in the schematics of individual proteins.
Fig. 3Effect of amino acid substitutions on the secondary structure of proteins encoded by mitochondrial genome of C. batrachus and C. gariepinus. Panel (i) represents sequence of C. batrachus and panel (ii) represents sequence of C. gariepinus. (A–F) represents the individual proteins and asterisk show the locations of the variation in the secondary structure of C. gariepinus protein.
Fig. 4Comparisons of the intrinsic disorder predisposition of the C. batrachus and C. gariepinus. A disorder threshold is indicated at score = 0.5, residues/regions with the disorder scores >0.5 are considered as disordered. (A–D) Each panel represents the disorder parameters of individual proteins including NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1, 2, 6 and ATP Synthase F0 subunit 8.
Protein structural analysis was performed by PROVEAN and I-mutant suite. The effect of mutation on protein function and stability was analysed using these two webservers.
| NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variant | PROVEAN score | Prediction (cutoff = -2.5) | ΔΔG value (Kcal/mol) | Stability | Reliability index |
| I75F | −0.166 | Neutral | −1.64 | Decrease | 8 |
| M257T | −1.562 | Neutral | −0.98 | Decrease | 7 |
| Variant | PROVEAN score | Prediction (cutoff = -2.5) | ΔΔG value (Kcal/mol) | Stability | Reliability index |
| P92Q | −6.87 | Deleterious | −0.99 | Decrease | 8 |
| I155T | 1.306 | Neutral | −2 | Decrease | 8 |
| L179M | −1.156 | Neutral | −0.99 | Decrease | 5 |
| A223G | −0.754 | Neutral | −1.17 | Decrease | 7 |
| T224A | −0.061 | Neutral | −1.07 | Decrease | 9 |
| T327A | 0.926 | Neutral | −0.91 | Decrease | 7 |
| Variant | PROVEAN score | Prediction (cutoff = -2.5) | ΔΔG value (Kcal/mol) | Stability | Reliability index |
| I7T | −1.135 | Neutral | −1.74 | decrease | 2 |
| Variant | PROVEAN score | Prediction (cutoff = -2.5) | ΔΔG value (Kcal/mol) | Stability | Reliability index |
| T45A | −1.572 | Neutral | −1.34 | decrease | 8 |
| P184H | −1.243 | Neutral | −1.32 | decrease | 7 |
| I381M | 2.144 | Neutral | −1.46 | decrease | 8 |
| Variant | PROVEAN score | Prediction (cutoff = -2.5) | ΔΔG value (Kcal/mol) | Stability | Reliability index |
| L30V | −0.729 | Neutral | −1.29 | decrease | 7 |
| Y38H | 2.038 | Neutral | −1.28 | increase | 1 |
| V39A | −1.142 | Neutral | −1.46 | decrease | 9 |
| I45T | 1.663 | Neutral | −2.2 | decrease | 8 |
| A113S | 1.653 | Neutral | −0.93 | decrease | 9 |
| L117M | 0.532 | Neutral | −1.37 | decrease | 7 |
| I192N | −4.605 | Deleterious | −1.73 | decrease | 7 |
| L207M | −1.057 | Neutral | −1.12 | decrease | 7 |
| P275Q | 1.906 | Neutral | −1.02 | decrease | 7 |
| I472L | −1.473 | Neutral | −0.9 | decrease | 7 |
| I548T | 1.504 | Neutral | −1.66 | decrease | 2 |
| V575L | 1.36 | Neutral | −1.08 | decrease | 2 |
| S577A | −1.158 | Neutral | −1.03 | decrease | 7 |
| Variant | PROVEAN score | Prediction (cutoff = -2.5) | ΔΔG value (Kcal/mol) | Stability | Reliability index |
| L96F | −1.391 | Neutral | −1.02 | decrease | 5 |
| V102M | −0.471 | Neutral | −1.11 | decrease | 6 |
| Variant | PROVEAN score | Prediction (cutoff = -2.5) | ΔΔG value (Kcal/mol) | Stability | Reliability index |
| L419V | 0.253 | Neutral | −1.15 | decrease | 6 |
| I460V | −0.294 | Neutral | −0.97 | decrease | 7 |
| Variant | PROVEAN score | Prediction (cutoff = -2.5) | ΔΔG value (Kcal/mol) | Stability | Reliability index |
| T117A | −0.316 | Neutral | −1.08 | decrease | 5 |
| L172M | 0.575 | Neutral | −1.35 | decrease | 7 |
| Variant | PROVEAN score | Prediction (cutoff = -2.5) | ΔΔG value (Kcal/mol) | Effect/stability | Reliability index |
| L29M | −0.39 | Neutral | −1.08 | decrease | 8 |
| Variant | PROVEAN score | Prediction (cutoff = -2.5) | ΔΔG value (Kcal/mol) | Stability | Reliability index |
| M41G | −3.169 | Deleterious | −1.06 | decrease | 8 |
| F81L | 2.572 | Neutral | −1.19 | decrease | 5 |