| Literature DB >> 32585808 |
Elizabeth Ramirez-Medina1,2, Elizabeth A Vuono3,4, Ayushi Rai1,4, Sarah Pruitt1,4, Ediane Silva1,5, Lauro Velazquez-Salinas1,5, James Zhu1, Manuel V Borca1, Douglas P Gladue1.
Abstract
African swine fever virus (ASFV) is the causative agent of the African swine fever (ASF) epizootic currently affecting pigs throughout Eurasia, causing significant economic losses in the swine industry. The virus genome encodes for more than 160 genes, of which only a few have been studied in detail. Here we describe the previously uncharacterized ASFV open reading frame (ORF) C962R, a gene encoding for a putative NTPase. RNA transcription studies using infected swine macrophages demonstrate that the C962R gene is translated as a late virus protein. A recombinant ASFV lacking the C962R gene (ASFV-G-ΔC962R) demonstrates in vivo that the C962R gene is non-essential, since ASFV-G-ΔC962R has similar replication kinetics in primary swine macrophage cell cultures when compared to parental highly virulent field isolate Georgia2007 (ASFV-G). Experimental infection of domestic pigs with ASFV-G-ΔC962R produced a clinical disease similar to that caused by the parental ASFV-G, confirming that deletion of the C962R gene from the ASFV genome does not impact virulence.Entities:
Keywords: ASF; ASFV; African swine fever virus; C962R
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32585808 PMCID: PMC7354530 DOI: 10.3390/v12060676
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1(A) Schematic representation of the C962R ORF (blue) in the ASFV-G genome, showing adjacent open reading frames (yellow). (B) Locations of the predicted functional domains in C962R, positions indicated are amino acid positions indicating the boundaries of the predicted domain. ∆E75 represents the region that is deleted in the ASFV E75 isolate.
Figure 2Multiple sequence alignment of the indicated ASFV isolates of viral protein C962R. Matching residues are represented as dots.
Figure 3Schematic for the development of ASFV-G-ΔC962R. The transfer vector contains the p72 promoter and a mCherry cassette; the flanking left and right arms are indicated and were designed to have flanking ends to both sides of the deletion/insertion cassette. The resulting ASFV-G-ΔC962R virus with the cassette inserted is shown on the bottom.
Figure 4In vitro growth kinetics in primary swine macrophage cell cultures for ASFV-G-ΔC962R and parental ASFV-G, infected (MOI = 0.01) with ASFV-G-ΔC962R or parental ASFV-G viruses. Samples were taken from three independent experiments at the indicated time points and titrated. Data represent means and standard deviations. Sensitivity using this methodology for detecting virus: >log10 1.8 HAD50/mL. No significant differences in viral yields between viruses were observed at any timepoint which had been tested determined using the Holm–Sidak method (α = 0.05), without assuming a consistent standard deviation. All calculations were conducted using the software GraphPad Prism version 8.
Swine survival and fever response following infection with ASFV-G-ΔC962R and parental ASFV-G.
| Fever | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virus (102 HAD50) | No. of Survivors/Total | Mean Time to Death(± SD) | No. of Days to Onset (± SD) | DurationNo. of Days (± SD) | Maximum Daily Temp, °F (± SD) |
| ASFV-G-ΔC962R | 0/5 | 5.4 (0.55) | 5.4 (0.55) | 1.4 (0.55) | 106 (0.87) |
| ASFV-G | 0/5 | 5.2 (0.45) | 4.4 (0.55) | 1 (1) | 106 (0.69) |
Figure 5Evolution of mortality (A) and body temperature (B) in animals (5 animals/group) Intramuscular (IM) infected with 102 HAD50 of either ASFV-G-ΔC962R (filled symbols) or parental ASFV-G (open symbols). No significant differences in rectal temperatures between both groups of pigs were found at any sample time tested using the Holm–Sidak method (α = 0.05) without assuming a consistent standard deviation. All calculations were conducted using the software GraphPad Prism version 8.
Figure 6Viremia titers detected in pigs IM inoculated with 102 HAD50 of either ASFV-G-ΔC962R (filled symbols), or ASFV-G (empty symbols). Each symbol represents the average of animal titers in each of the groups. Sensitivity of virus detection: > log10 1.8 TCID50/mL. No significant differences in viremia values between both groups of pigs were found at any sample time tested using the Holm–Sidak method (α = 0.05) without assuming a consistent standard deviation. All calculations were conducted on the software GraphPad Prism version 8.