| Literature DB >> 36016456 |
Elizabeth Ramirez-Medina1, Elizabeth Vuono1,2, Sarah Pruitt1, Ayushi Rai1,3, Nallely Espinoza1, Alyssa Valladares1,3, Edward Spinard1, Ediane Silva1, Lauro Velazquez-Salinas1, Douglas P Gladue1, Manuel V Borca1.
Abstract
African swine fever virus (ASFV) is the etiological agent of a swine pandemic affecting a large geographical area extending from Central Europe to Asia. The viral disease was also recently identified in the Dominican Republic and Haiti. ASFV is a structurally complex virus with a large dsDNA genome that encodes for more than 150 genes. Most of these genes have not been experimentally characterized. One of these genes, A151R, encodes for a nonstructural protein and has been reported to be required for the replication of a Vero-cell-adapted ASFV strain. Here, we evaluated the role of the A151R gene in the context of the highly virulent field isolate Georgia 2010 (ASFV-G) during virus replication in swine macrophage cell cultures and during experimental infection in swine. We show that the recombinant virus ASFV-G-∆A151R, harboring a deletion of the A151R gene, replicated in swine macrophage cultures as efficiently as the parental virus ASFV-G, indicating that the A151R gene is not required for ASFV replication in swine macrophages. Interestingly, experimental infection of domestic pigs demonstrated that ASFV-G-∆A151R had a decreased replication rate and produced a drastic reduction in virus virulence. Animals were intramuscularly inoculated with 102 HAD50 of ASFV-G-∆A151R and compared with pigs receiving a similar dose of virulent ASFV-G. All ASFV-G-infected pigs developed an acute lethal form of the disease, while those inoculated with ASFV-G-∆A151R remained healthy during the 28-day observational period, with the exception of only one showing a protracted, but fatal, form of the disease. All ASFV-G-∆A151R surviving animals presented protracted viremias with lower virus titers than those detected in ASFV-G-infected animals. In addition, three out of the four animals surviving the infection with ASFV-G-∆A151R were protected against the challenge with the virulent parental virus ASFV-G. This is the first report indicating that the ASFV A151R gene is involved in virus virulence in domestic swine, suggesting that its deletion may be used to increase the safety profile of currently experimental vaccines.Entities:
Keywords: A151R; ASF; ASFV; African swine fever virus; helicase
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36016456 PMCID: PMC9413758 DOI: 10.3390/v14081834
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.818
Figure 1Evaluation of A151R protein across ASFV isolates. (A) Amino acid alignment representing the diversity of A151R protein of ASFV in the field. Residues in white spots represent changes between amino acids with different charges. Conservation plot scores reflect the nature of the change in specific sites, with high scores associated with changes in similar biological properties. Alignment was produced using the software Jalview version 2.11.1.4. (B) Phylogenetic analysis representing the diversity of A151R protein of ASFV in the field. Based on the cluster distribution, isolates were categorized into five groups. Numbers above internal branches represent bootstrap values (1000 repetitions). (C) The graphic represents the dN (rate of evolution at non-synonymous sites), dS (rate of evolution at synonymous sites), and ratio (dN-dS) at specific codon sites in the A151R gene of ASFV. Blue and red asterisks represent codon sites evolving under diversifying and purifying selection, respectively. Analyses were conducted using the evolutionary algorithms FEL and MEME using cutoff values of p = 0.1. (D) Phylogenetic analysis showing the topology incongruence produced by different segments where the single breakpoint at nucleotide 197 was detected by GARD. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted with the maximum likelihood method, using the general time reversible model.
Figure 2Expression profile of A151R gene of ASFV during in vitro infection of porcine macrophages. Reverse transcription followed by qPCR was used to evaluate the expression profile of the A151R gene during in vitro infection at different time points, up to 24 h. As a reference for this analysis, we used qPCRs to specifically detect the expression of genes encoding ASFV proteins p30 (early expression) and p72 (late expression). Additionally, the β-actin gene was used as a control to evaluate the quality and levels of RNA during the infection at different time points.
Figure 3Schematic for the development of ASFV-G-∆A151R. The transfer vector contains the p72 promoter and a mCherry cassette; the flanking left and right arms are indicated and were designed to have flanking ends at both sides of the deletion/insertion cassette. The nucleotide positions of the ASFV-G genome are indicated. The resulting ASFV-G-∆A151R virus with the cassette inserted is shown on the bottom.
Figure 4In vitro growth kinetics in primary swine macrophage cell cultures for ASFV-G-∆A151R and parental ASFV-G (MOI = 0.01). Samples were taken from three independent experiments at the indicated time points and titrated. Data represent means and standard deviations of three replicas. Sensitivity using this methodology for detecting virus was ≥log10 1.8 HAD50/mL. No significant differences in viral yields between viruses were observed at any time point tested, which was determined using the Holm–Sidak method (α = 0.05) without assuming a consistent standard deviation. All calculations were conducted using the software Graphpad Prism version 8.
Swine survival and fever response following infection with ASFV-G-∆A151R and parental ASFV-G.
| Fever | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virus (102 HAD50) | No. of Survivors/Total | Mean Time to Death (± SD) | No. of Days to Onset (± SD) | Duration No. of Days (± SD) | Maximum Daily Temp, °C (± SD) |
| ASFV-G-∆A151R | 4/5 | 21 * | 16 | 5 | 40.94 |
| ASFV-G | 0/5 | 7 (0) | 5.6 (0.55) | 1.4 (0.55) | 41.25 (038) |
(*) Results for the only animal in the group that developed disease and needed to be euthanized on day 21 pi.
Figure 5Evolution of body temperature (A) and mortality (B) in animals (5 animals/group) IM infected with 102 HAD50 of either ASFV-G-∆A151R or parental ASFV-G.
Figure 6Viremia titers detected in pigs IM inoculated with 102 HAD50 of either ASFV-G-∆A151R (black symbols) or ASFV-G (red and green symbols). Each symbol represents the average of animal titers in each of the groups. Sensitivity of virus detection: >log10 1.8 TCID50/mL.
Figure 7Anti-ASFV antibody titers detected by ELISA in pigs IM inoculated with 102 HAD50 of ASFV-G-ΔA151R. Each point represents values from individual animals.
Figure 8Evolution of body temperature (A) and mortality (B) in animals (4 animals/group) IM infected with 102 HAD50 of ASFV-G-ΔA151R and challenged 28 days later with 102 HAD50 of parental ASFV-G.