Literature DB >> 32585117

Standardizing Assessment of Spoken Discourse in Aphasia: A Working Group With Deliverables.

Brielle C Stark1,2, Manaswita Dutta1, Laura L Murray3, Lucy Bryant4, Davida Fromm5, Brian MacWhinney5, Amy E Ramage6, Angela Roberts7, Dirk B den Ouden8, Kris Brock9, Katy McKinney-Bock10, Eun Jin Paek11, Tyson G Harmon12, Si On Yoon13, Charalambos Themistocleous14, Hyunsoo Yoo15, Katharine Aveni7, Stephanie Gutierrez7, Saryu Sharma16.   

Abstract

Purpose The heterogeneous nature of measures, methods, and analyses reported in the aphasia spoken discourse literature precludes comparison of outcomes across studies (e.g., meta-analyses) and inhibits replication. Furthermore, funding and time constraints significantly hinder collecting test-retest data on spoken discourse outcomes. This research note describes the development and structure of a working group, designed to address major gaps in the spoken discourse aphasia literature, including a lack of standardization in methodology, analysis, and reporting, as well as nominal data regarding the psychometric properties of spoken discourse outcomes. Method The initial initiatives for this working group are to (a) propose recommendations regarding standardization of spoken discourse collection, analysis, and reporting in aphasia, based on the results of an international survey and a systematic literature review and (b) create a database of test-retest spoken discourse data from individuals with and without aphasia. The survey of spoken discourse collection, analysis, and interpretation procedures was distributed to clinicians and researchers involved in aphasia assessment and rehabilitation from September to November 2019. We will publish survey results and recommend standards for collecting, analyzing, and reporting spoken discourse in aphasia. A multisite endeavor to collect test-retest spoken discourse data from individuals with and without aphasia will be initiated. This test-retest information will be contributed to a central site for transcription and analysis, and data will be subsequently openly curated. Conclusion The goal of the working group is to create recommendations for field-wide standards in methods, analysis, and reporting of spoken discourse outcomes, as has been done across other related disciplines (e.g., Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research, Committee on Best Practice in Data Analysis and Sharing). Additionally, the creation of a database through our multisite collaboration will allow the identification of psychometrically sound outcome measures and norms that can be used by clinicians and researchers to assess spoken discourse abilities in aphasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32585117      PMCID: PMC9128722          DOI: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   4.018


  32 in total

Review 1.  Reporting child language sampling procedures.

Authors:  Lizbeth H Finestack; Bita Payesteh; Jill Rentmeester Disher; Hannah M Julien
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  The use of main concept analysis to measure discourse production in Cantonese-speaking persons with aphasia: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Anthony Pak-Hin Kong
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Stability of Word-Retrieval Errors With the AphasiaBank Stimuli.

Authors:  Mary Boyle
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia: acceptability, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  Madeleine Pritchard; Katerina Hilari; Naomi Cocks; Lucy Dipper
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Describing conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and communication partners following communication partner training: Using exchange structure analysis.

Authors:  Phoebe Sim; Emma Power; Leanne Togher
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 6.  Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

Authors:  Carolee J Winstein; Joel Stein; Ross Arena; Barbara Bates; Leora R Cherney; Steven C Cramer; Frank Deruyter; Janice J Eng; Beth Fisher; Richard L Harvey; Catherine E Lang; Marilyn MacKay-Lyons; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Sue Pugh; Mathew J Reeves; Lorie G Richards; William Stiers; Richard D Zorowitz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Competence in discourse as a measure of social integration and quality of life in persons with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  T Galski; C Tompkins; M V Johnston
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 8.  Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI.

Authors:  Thomas E Nichols; Samir Das; Simon B Eickhoff; Alan C Evans; Tristan Glatard; Michael Hanke; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Michael P Milham; Russell A Poldrack; Jean-Baptiste Poline; Erika Proal; Bertrand Thirion; David C Van Essen; Tonya White; B T Thomas Yeo
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  A Comparison of Three Discourse Elicitation Methods in Aphasia and Age-Matched Adults: Implications for Language Assessment and Outcome.

Authors:  Brielle C Stark
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 10.  Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.

Authors:  Marian C Brady; Helen Kelly; Jon Godwin; Pam Enderby; Pauline Campbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-06-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Spoken Discourse Assessment and Analysis in Aphasia: An International Survey of Current Practices.

Authors:  Brielle C Stark; Manaswita Dutta; Laura L Murray; Davida Fromm; Lucy Bryant; Tyson G Harmon; Amy E Ramage; Angela C Roberts
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.674

2.  A Comparison of Manual Versus Automated Quantitative Production Analysis of Connected Speech.

Authors:  Davida Fromm; Saketh Katta; Mason Paccione; Sophia Hecht; Joel Greenhouse; Brian MacWhinney; Tatiana T Schnur
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.297

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.