Literature DB >> 32584579

Improving Proteoform Identifications in Complex Systems Through Integration of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Data.

Leah V Schaffer1, Robert J Millikin1, Michael R Shortreed1, Mark Scalf1, Lloyd M Smith1.   

Abstract

Cellular functions are performed by a vast and diverse set of proteoforms. Proteoforms are the specific forms of proteins produced as a result of genetic variations, RNA splicing, and post-translational modifications (PTMs). Top-down mass spectrometric analysis of intact proteins enables proteoform identification, including proteoforms derived from sequence cleavage events or harboring multiple PTMs. In contrast, bottom-up proteomics identifies peptides, which necessitates protein inference and does not yield proteoform identifications. We seek here to exploit the synergies between these two data types to improve the quality and depth of the overall proteomic analysis. To this end, we automated the large-scale integration of results from multiprotease bottom-up and top-down analyses in the software program Proteoform Suite and applied it to the analysis of proteoforms from the human Jurkat T lymphocyte cell line. We implemented the recently developed proteoform-level classification scheme for top-down tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) identifications in Proteoform Suite, which enables users to observe the level and type of ambiguity for each proteoform identification, including which of the ambiguous proteoform identifications are supported by bottom-up-level evidence. We used Proteoform Suite to find instances where top-down identifications aid in protein inference from bottom-up analysis and conversely where bottom-up peptide identifications aid in proteoform PTM localization. We also show the use of bottom-up data to infer proteoform candidates potentially present in the sample, allowing confirmation of such proteoform candidates by intact-mass analysis of MS1 spectra. The implementation of these capabilities in the freely available software program Proteoform Suite enables users to integrate large-scale top-down and bottom-up data sets and to utilize the synergies between them to improve and extend the proteomic analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bottom-up proteomics; post-translational modification; protein inference; proteoforms; software; top-down proteomics

Year:  2020        PMID: 32584579      PMCID: PMC7490796          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  32 in total

Review 1.  Jurkat T cells and development of the T-cell receptor signalling paradigm.

Authors:  Robert T Abraham; Arthur Weiss
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 53.106

2.  Enhanced Global Post-translational Modification Discovery with MetaMorpheus.

Authors:  Stefan K Solntsev; Michael R Shortreed; Brian L Frey; Lloyd M Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Improved Protein Inference from Multiple Protease Bottom-Up Mass Spectrometry Data.

Authors:  Rachel M Miller; Robert J Millikin; Connor V Hoffmann; Stefan K Solntsev; Gloria M Sheynkman; Michael R Shortreed; Lloyd M Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 4.  Top-Down Proteomics: Ready for Prime Time?

Authors:  Bifan Chen; Kyle A Brown; Ziqing Lin; Ying Ge
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Integrated workflow for characterizing intact phosphoproteins from complex mixtures.

Authors:  Si Wu; Feng Yang; Rui Zhao; Nikola Tolić; Errol W Robinson; David G Camp; Richard D Smith; Ljiljana Pasa-Tolić
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  MSFragger: ultrafast and comprehensive peptide identification in mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

Authors:  Andy T Kong; Felipe V Leprevost; Dmitry M Avtonomov; Dattatreya Mellacheruvu; Alexey I Nesvizhskii
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Global Post-Translational Modification Discovery.

Authors:  Qiyao Li; Michael R Shortreed; Craig D Wenger; Brian L Frey; Leah V Schaffer; Mark Scalf; Lloyd M Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Global Identification of Protein Post-translational Modifications in a Single-Pass Database Search.

Authors:  Michael R Shortreed; Craig D Wenger; Brian L Frey; Gloria M Sheynkman; Mark Scalf; Mark P Keller; Alan D Attie; Lloyd M Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  Deducing the presence of proteins and proteoforms in quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Casimir Bamberger; Salvador Martínez-Bartolomé; Miranda Montgomery; Sandra Pankow; John D Hulleman; Jeffery W Kelly; John R Yates
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Histone H3 tail clipping regulates gene expression.

Authors:  Helena Santos-Rosa; Antonis Kirmizis; Christopher Nelson; Till Bartke; Nehme Saksouk; Jacques Cote; Tony Kouzarides
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2008-12-14       Impact factor: 15.369

View more
  6 in total

1.  Putting Humpty Dumpty Back Together Again: What Does Protein Quantification Mean in Bottom-Up Proteomics?

Authors:  Deanna L Plubell; Lukas Käll; Bobbie-Jo Webb-Robertson; Lisa M Bramer; Ashley Ives; Neil L Kelleher; Lloyd M Smith; Thomas J Montine; Christine C Wu; Michael J MacCoss
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  Proteomics Standards Initiative's ProForma 2.0: Unifying the Encoding of Proteoforms and Peptidoforms.

Authors:  Richard D LeDuc; Eric W Deutsch; Pierre-Alain Binz; Ryan T Fellers; Anthony J Cesnik; Joshua A Klein; Tim Van Den Bossche; Ralf Gabriels; Arshika Yalavarthi; Yasset Perez-Riverol; Jeremy Carver; Wout Bittremieux; Shin Kawano; Benjamin Pullman; Nuno Bandeira; Neil L Kelleher; Paul M Thomas; Juan Antonio Vizcaíno
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 3.  Recent advances (2019-2021) of capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry for multilevel proteomics.

Authors:  Daoyang Chen; Elijah N McCool; Zhichang Yang; Xiaojing Shen; Rachele A Lubeckyj; Tian Xu; Qianjie Wang; Liangliang Sun
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 10.946

4.  Automated Assignment of Proteoform Classification Levels.

Authors:  Zach Rolfs; Lloyd M Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 5.370

5.  Identification of Inflammatory Proteomics Networks of Toll-like Receptor 4 through Immunoprecipitation-Based Chemical Cross-Linking Proteomics.

Authors:  A D A Shahinuzzaman; Abu Hena Mostafa Kamal; Jayanta K Chakrabarty; Aurchie Rahman; Saiful M Chowdhury
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2022-09-01

Review 6.  Quantitative proteomics characterization of cancer biomarkers and treatment.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Yang; Yi Shi; Dan-Dan Zhang; Rui Xin; Jing Deng; Ting-Miao Wu; Hui-Min Wang; Pei-Yao Wang; Ji-Bin Liu; Wen Li; Yu-Shui Ma; Da Fu
Journal:  Mol Ther Oncolytics       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 7.200

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.