| Literature DB >> 32584390 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a tumor that is commonly found in southern China. NPC has several risk factors, such as infection with the Epstein-Barr virus. However, we know little about the risk factors for eye metastasis (EM) in male patients with NPC. Serum lipids are well recognized as risk factors for cardiovascular disease, and recent studies show that they also have a relationship with the development of NPC.Entities:
Keywords: eye metastasis (EM); male; nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC); risk factor; total cholesterol (TC); triglyceride (TG)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32584390 PMCID: PMC7317591 DOI: 10.1042/BSR20201082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosci Rep ISSN: 0144-8463 Impact factor: 3.840
The clinical characteristics in EM and NEM groups
| Characteristics | EM (%) ( | NEM (%) ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age | 57.8 ± 9.3 | 54.0 ± 8.2 | 0.072 |
| Histopathology | |||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 12 (75.0) | 1099 (97.8) | 0.122 |
| Undifferentiated carcinoma | 4 (25.0) | 25 (2.2) | |
| Distribution | |||
| Nanchang | 4 (25.0) | 389 (34.6) | |
| Jian | 0 | 109 (9.7) | |
| Fuzhou | 2 (12.5) | 97 (8.6) | |
| Shangrao | 3 (18.8) | 111 (9.9) | |
| Yichun | 2 (12.5) | 126 (11.2) | |
| Jingdezhen | 0 | 45 (4.0) | |
| Ganzhou | 1 (6.3) | 33 (2.9) | |
| Jiujiang | 3 (18.8) | 119 (10.6) | |
| Yingtan | 1 (6.3) | 30 (2.7) | |
| Xinyu | 0 | 27 (2.4) | |
| Pingxiang | 0 | 38 (3.4) |
*Student’s t-test was performed.
†Chi-square test was used. P<0.05 revealed significant difference.
Abbreviations: EM, eye metastasis; NEM, non-eye metastasis.
Figure 1The HE staining and IHC images from nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with eye metastasis
Notes: (A) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (HE×200), (B) P40(+) (SP×200), (C) CK (+) (SP×200). The tissue was collected from eye metastasis site of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Figure 2Histopathology (A) and Distribution (B) of male nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with or without eye metastasis
Abbreviations: EM, eye metastasis; NEM, non-eye metastasis.
Comparison of tumor makers between EM and NEM group
| Tumor marker | EM | NEM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TG (mmol/l) | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ±1.1 | <0.001 |
| TC (mmol/l) | 3.3 ± 1.5 | 4.4 ± 1.2 | 0.017 |
| HDL (mmol/l) | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 0.894 |
| LDL (mmol/l) | 14.8 ± 48.9 | 2.8± 2.5 | 0.343 |
| Apo A1(g/l) | 1.7± 0.4 | 1.8 ± 1.4 | 0.918 |
| Apo B (g/l) | 1.4 ± 1.5 | 1.1± 0.6 | 0.468 |
Note: Student’s t-test test was performed. P<0.05 revealed statistical significance.
Abbreviations: Apo A1, apolipoprotein A1; Apo B, apolipoprotein B; EM, eye metastasis; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; NEM, non-eye metastasis; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride.
The binary logistic regression model between EM and NEM group
| Tumor marker | Exp( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TG | 2.486 | 12.010 | 0.004 |
| TC | 0.826 | 2.285 | <0.001 |
Note: The binary logistic analysis was performed. P<0.05 means significant difference.
Abbreviations: B, coefficient of regression; TC, serum total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride.
Figure 3The ROC curves of different markers to predict EM in primary lung cancer
The ROC curves showed that the area under the ROC curve of TG and TC were 0.764 and 0.681 (P=0.004, P<0.001, respectively). Abbreviations: ROC, receiver operating characteristic; TC total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride.
The cutoff value, sensitivity, specificity and AUC of TG and CYFRA21-1 in detecting the EM in metastatic NPC
| Tumor maker | Cutoff value | Sensitivity | Specificity | AUC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TG (mmol/l) | 0.975 | 87.5% | 62.7% | 0.764 | <0.001 |
| TC (mmol/l) | 3.425 | 50.0% | 87.2% | 0.681 | 0.013 |
Note: The sensitivity and specificity were calculated at the point of Youden's index. P<0.05 indicates statistical significance.
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; EM, eye metastasis; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; NPC, nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
The serum lipids as risk factors of different kinds of cancer
| Author | Year | Cancer | Serum lipids |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sun et al. [ | 2019 | Gastric cancer | TG, HDL |
| Dashti et al. [ | 2019 | Colorectal cancer | TC, TG |
| Zhang et al. [ | 2017 | Non-small-cell lung cancer | TC, DB |
| Arthur et al. [ | 2016 | Prostate cancer | TG, TC |
| Kapil et al. [ | 2013 | Breast cancer | TG, TC |
| Saito et al. [ | 2013 | Liver cancer | LDL |
| Lyu et al. [ | 2018 | Lung cancer in men | TC |
Abbreviations: DB, direct bilirubin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triacylglycerol.