Literature DB >> 30083752

Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Gloria D Coronado1, Amanda F Petrik1, William M Vollmer1, Stephen H Taplin2, Erin M Keast1, Scott Fields3, Beverly B Green4.   

Abstract

Importance: Approximately 24 million US individuals receive care at federally qualified health centers, which historically have low rates of colorectal cancer screening. The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends routine colorectal cancer screening for individuals aged 50 to 75 years. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach program implemented in health centers as part of standard care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial was conducted in 26 federally qualified health center clinics, representing 8 health centers in Oregon and California, randomized to intervention (n = 13) or usual care (n = 13). All participants were overdue for colorectal cancer screening during the accrual interval (February 4, 2014 to February 3, 2015). Interventions: Electronic health record-embedded tools to identify eligible adults and to facilitate implementation of a stepwise mailed intervention involving (1) an introductory letter, (2) a mailed FIT, and (3) a reminder letter; training, collaborative learning, and facilitation through a practice improvement process. Main Outcomes and Measures: Effectiveness was measured as clinic-level proportions of adults who completed a FIT, and secondarily, any colorectal cancer screening within 12 months of accrual or by August 3, 2015. Implementation was measured as clinic-level proportions of adults who were mailed an introductory letter and ordered a FIT.
Results: Twenty-six clinics with 41 193 adults (mean [SD] age, 58.5 [6.3] years; 22 994 women) were randomized to receive the direct mail colorectal screening intervention (13 clinics; 21 134 patients) or usual care (13 clinics; 20 059 patients). Compared with usual care clinics, intervention clinics had significantly higher adjusted clinic-level proportion of participants who completed a FIT (13.9% vs 10.4%; difference, 3.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.1%-6.8%) and any colorectal cancer screening (18.3% vs 14.5%; difference, 3.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.6%-7.0%). We observed large variation across health centers in effectiveness (FIT completion differences range, -7.4 percentage points to 17.6 percentage points) and implementation (proportion who were mailed a FIT range, 6.5% to 68.2%). The number needed to mail to achieve a completed FIT was 4.8 overall, and 4.0 in clinics that mailed a FIT reminder. Conclusions and Relevance: An EHR-embedded mailed FIT outreach intervention significantly improved rates of FIT completion and rates of any colorectal cancer screening. Higher rates of colorectal cancer screening occurred in clinics that successfully implemented the mailed outreach program. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01742065.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30083752      PMCID: PMC6142956          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  23 in total

1.  The "Efficacy-Effectiveness Gap": Historical Background and Current Conceptualization.

Authors:  Clementine Nordon; Helene Karcher; Rolf H H Groenwold; Mikkel Zöllner Ankarfeldt; Franz Pichler; Helene Chevrou-Severac; Michel Rossignol; Adeline Abbe; Lucien Abenhaim
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  Implementation successes and challenges in participating in a pragmatic study to improve colon cancer screening: perspectives of health center leaders.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Jennifer L Schneider; Amanda Petrik; Jennifer Rivelli; Stephen Taplin; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Effectiveness of a clinic-based colorectal cancer screening promotion program for underserved Hispanics.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Ilya Golovaty; Gary Longton; Lisa Levy; Ricardo Jimenez
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Mailed fecal immunochemical tests plus educational materials to improve colon cancer screening rates in Iowa Research Network (IRENE) practices.

Authors:  Barcey T Levy; Jeanette M Daly; Yinghui Xu; John W Ely
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

5.  The validation of electronic health records in accurately identifying patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening in safety net clinics.

Authors:  Amanda F Petrik; Beverly B Green; William M Vollmer; Thuy Le; Barbara Bachman; Erin Keast; Jennifer Rivelli; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  Participation rates for organized colorectal cancer screening programmes: an international comparison.

Authors:  Carrie Klabunde; Johannes Blom; Jean-Luc Bulliard; Montse Garcia; Lea Hagoel; Verna Mai; Julietta Patnick; Heather Rozjabek; Carlo Senore; Sven Törnberg
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.136

7.  Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations: design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; William M Vollmer; Amanda Petrik; Stephen H Taplin; Timothy E Burdick; Richard T Meenan; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Amy B Knudsen; Janneke Wilschut; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act model: Pacesetters experiences.

Authors:  Parm Moule; David Evans; Katherine Pollard
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur       Date:  2013

10.  Using an Automated Data-driven, EHR-Embedded Program for Mailing FIT kits: Lessons from the STOP CRC Pilot Study.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Tim Burdick; Amanda Petrik; Tanya Kapka; Sally Retecki; Beverly Green
Journal:  J Gen Pract (Los Angel)       Date:  2014-01-05
View more
  44 in total

1.  Error in Table 1.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Two Medicaid health plans' models and motivations for improving colorectal cancer screening rates.

Authors:  Jennifer K Coury; Jennifer L Schneider; Beverly B Green; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Amanda F Petrik; Jennifer S Rivelli; Malaika R Schwartz; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Effectiveness and Cost of Organized Outreach for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ma Somsouk; Carly Rachocki; Ajitha Mannalithara; Dianne Garcia; Victoria Laleau; Barbara Grimes; Rachel B Issaka; Ellen Chen; Eric Vittinghoff; Jean A Shapiro; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  A Systematic Review of Repeat Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Ahana Sen; Bianca Watson; Samir Gupta; Helen Mayo; Amit G Singal
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Effect of a Digital Health Intervention on Decreasing Barriers and Increasing Facilitators for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Vulnerable Patients.

Authors:  Nancy M Denizard-Thompson; David P Miller; Anna C Snavely; John G Spangler; L Doug Case; Kathryn E Weaver
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Making FIT Count: Maximizing Appropriate Use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs.

Authors:  Vivy T Cusumano; Folasade P May
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of a colorectal cancer screening program in safety net clinics.

Authors:  Richard T Meenan; Gloria D Coronado; Amanda Petrik; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Patient randomized trial of a targeted navigation program to improve rates of follow-up colonoscopy in community health centers.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Eric S Johnson; Michael C Leo; Jennifer L Schneider; David Smith; Raj Mummadi; Amanda F Petrik; Jamie H Thompson; Ricardo Jimenez
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  A qualitative study of patient preferences for prompts and reminders for a direct-mail fecal testing program.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Jennifer L Schneider; Rose Gunn; Jennifer S Rivelli; Katherine A Vaughn; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 10.  Breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dominika Bhatia; Iliana C Lega; Wei Wu; Lorraine L Lipscombe
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.