Literature DB >> 32577378

Wide-field polygon-scanning photoacoustic microscopy of oxygen saturation at 1-MHz A-line rate.

Jiangbo Chen1, Yachao Zhang1, Linyun He2, Yizhi Liang3, Lidai Wang1,4.   

Abstract

We report wide-field polygon-scanning functional OR-PAM that for the first time achieves 1-MHz A-line rate of oxygen saturation in vivo. We address two technical challenges. The first is a 1-MHz dual-wavelength pulsed laser that has sufficient pulse energy and ultrafast wavelength switching. The second is a polygon-scanning imaging probe that has a fast scanning speed, a large field of view, and great sensitivity. The OR-PAM system offers a B-scan rate of 477.5 Hz in a 12-mm range and a volumetric imaging rate of ∼1 Hz over a 12 × 5 mm2 scanning area. We image microvasculature and blood oxygen saturation in a 12 × 12 mm2 scanning area in 5 s. Dynamic imaging of oxygen saturation in the mouse ear is demonstrated to monitor fast response to epinephrine injection. The new wide-field fast functional imaging ability broadens the biomedical application of OR-PAM.
© 2020 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional imaging; Oxygen saturation; Photoacoustic microscopy; Wide-Field

Year:  2020        PMID: 32577378      PMCID: PMC7300162          DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2020.100195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photoacoustics        ISSN: 2213-5979


Introduction

Optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy (OR-PAM) is an emerging biomedical imaging technology that has a sub-cellular resolution, rich optical absorption contrasts, and label-free functional imaging ability [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]]. Especially, OR-PAM can image oxygen saturation (sO2) at a high spatial resolution without labeling, which offers an important tool for many preclinical and clinical applications [11]. sO2 may change in normal tissue activities and disease progression. High imaging speed in a large field of view (FOV) is desirable to image the functional connectivity among different regions or sO2 change in diseased tissue. High-speed functional OR-PAM has been developed with fast scanners and high-pulse-repetition-rate lasers. Many fast-scanning techniques, including Galvo mirror-based optical scanning, voice-coil scanner, water-immersible resonant-mirror scanner, and multi-focal illumination with array-transducer-based parallel detection, have been developed for fast OR [[12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]]. Although each technique has its advantages, it remains a challenge to achieve high sensitivity, fast speed, and large scanning area at the same time without significant compromise among them [22,23]. The recent development of spinning-mirror OR-PAM has achieved a hundreds-of-Hz scanning speed over a wide range [24], but a remaining problem is that sO2 imaging has not been achieved at this speed and wide range. Another challenge for fast functional OR-PAM is the pulsed laser that has multiple wavelengths, sufficient pulse energy, high pulse repetition rate, and short-wavelength switching time [[25], [26], [27], [28], [29]]. Commercially available high-pulse-repetition-rate lasers usually provide only one wavelength [15,30]. Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) in Raman crystal or an optical fiber has been used to generate other wavelengths [31,32]. With a low SRS threshold, the fiber-based approach is more suitable for OR-PAM than the crystal-based one [[33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]]. Electro-optical modulator (EOM) or fiber-based optical delay can switch the pump and SRS wavelengths at high speed [39,40] but have not been used in functional OR-PAM beyond 1-MHz pulse repetition rate [37]. Here we present polygon-scanning functional OP-PAM that, for the first time, achieves 1-MHz sO2 A-line rate over a large FOV. We develop an SRS laser with two wavelengths (532 nm and 558 nm), 1-MHz pulse repetition rate, ∼80 nJ pulse energy, and ∼150-ns wavelength switching time. This offers a fast and stable laser source for functional OR-PAM. A water-immersible polygon-scanning mirror is developed to steer both the laser and the ultrasonic beams together, ensuring a high sensitivity in fast scanning. The polygon scanner offers a B-scan rate of 477.5 Hz over a 12-mm range. Integrating the new laser and fast-scanning imaging probe, we implement in vivo sO2 imaging at a 1-MHz A-line rate over a 12 × 12 mm2 scanning area. The volumetric imaging speed can be scalable to ∼1 Hz within 12 × 5 mm2, or even faster with a reduced scanning area but at the same A-line rate. We show that the new OR-PAM system can image fast changes in hemoglobin concentration and sO2 after epinephrine injection.

Methods

Wide-field polygon-scanning photoacoustic microscopy

Fig. 1(a) shows a schematic of the polygon-scanning OR-PAM system. Fast functional imaging requires that the laser has dual or multiple wavelengths, high pulse repetition rate, fast wavelength switching, and enough pulse energy. Here, we develop a 1-MHz dual-wavelength pulsed laser system. A 532-nm 1-MHz pulsed Q-switch fiber laser (VPFL-G-20, Spectra-Physics) is used as the pump source. The pump beam is split by a polarizing beamsplitter (PBS) into two. A halfwave plate is placed before the PBS to adjust the energy ratio of the two beams. One beam is coupled into a 30-m polarization-maintaining single-mode fiber (HB450-SC, Fibercore) to generate the 558-nm wavelength via the SRS effect. Another halfwave plate is placed before the 30-m fiber to align the polarization direction with a principal axis of the fiber to maximize the SRS efficiency. A bandpass filter (560-nm central wavelength, 10-nm bandwidth, model #87-887, Edmund Optics Inc.) is used to pass the 558-nm wavelength and reject others (Fig. 1(b)). The 30-m fiber delays the 558-nm pulse by 150 ns (Fig. 1(c)). The other 532-nm beam is merged with the delayed 558-nm beam using a dichroic mirror (T550lpxr-UF1, Chroma Technology Corp). The merged beam is coupled into a 2-m single-mode fiber and delivered to the OR-PAM probe.
Fig. 1

(a) A schematic of polygon-scanning OR-PAM. BPF, bandpass filter; DM, dichroic mirror; HWP, half-wave plate; NDF, neutral density filter; PBS, polarization beam splitter; CL, correction lens; UT, ultrasonic transducer; AL, acoustic lens; PS, polygon scanner. (b) The spectrum of the combined excitation beam. (c) Delay time between the 532-nm and 558-nm pulses. (d) The schematic of the belt-driving system.

(a) A schematic of polygon-scanning OR-PAM. BPF, bandpass filter; DM, dichroic mirror; HWP, half-wave plate; NDF, neutral density filter; PBS, polarization beam splitter; CL, correction lens; UT, ultrasonic transducer; AL, acoustic lens; PS, polygon scanner. (b) The spectrum of the combined excitation beam. (c) Delay time between the 532-nm and 558-nm pulses. (d) The schematic of the belt-driving system. In the OR-PAM probe, the laser beam from the optical fiber is first collimated (#47-654-INK, Edmund Optics Inc) and then focused by an objective (0.042 numerical aperture, #47-654-INK, Edmund Optics Inc). The objective is mounted in a waterproof sleeve and is immersed in water, offering a stable water-air interface for the optical beam. A correction lens (#47-473-INK, Edmund Optics Inc) is placed on the optical/acoustic beam combiner to reduce optical aberration. The optical/acoustic beam combiner is made by gluing an aluminum-coated prism to an uncoated prism (#32-331 and #32-330, Edmund Optics Inc, and NOA61 glue from Norland Products Inc). The aluminum coating reflects the optical beam and transmits ultrasound. After reflection, the optical beam transmits through a planoconcave acoustic lens (#48-267-INK, Edmund Optics Inc) and then is reflected by a polygon mirror to the sample. The polygon mirror has six aluminum-coated glass surfaces to reflect both light and ultrasound. The optical reflectivity of the polygon mirror is above 95% for both wavelengths. In the detection, the acoustic wave is reflected on the polygon mirror. The polygon mirror is coated with aluminum. The significant acoustic impedance mismatch between aluminum (17.1 × 106 kg m−2 s−1) and water (1.5 × 106 kg m−2 s−1) contributes to good acoustic reflectivity. The incidence angle of the ultrasonic beam ranges from 25° to 70° and is greater than the total reflection angle (13.8°) of the aluminum-coated mirror in water. The measured ultrasonic reflectivity of the aluminum-coated mirror is greater than 97% which is close to total reflection. Then, the reflected acoustic beam is collimated by the planoconcave acoustic lens, transmits through the optical/acoustic beam combiner, and detected by a broadband piezoelectric transducer (50-MHz center frequency, 78% bandwidth, V214-BC-RM, Olympus). The optical focus is adjusted to confocally align with the acoustic focus so that the detection sensitivity is optimized. Each mirror surface is 6.0 × 9.2 mm2. When spinning, the polygon mirrors scan the optical and acoustic beams together so that the confocal alignment can be maintained. Each mirror can scan within ±30°, reflecting the optical and acoustic beams within ±60°. Excluding the ineffective reflection on the mirror edges, the usable scanning range is around ±40°, corresponding to a 12-mm range on the sample surface. The photoacoustic signal from the ultrasonic transducer is amplified by 48 dB (two ZFL-500LN + amplifiers from Mini-Circuits) and digitized at 200 MHz by a data acquisition card (ATS9360, Alazar Technologies Inc). A brushless motor (ECX Program, Maxon Motor, Swiss) drives the polygon scanner through a belt as shown in Fig. (d). The motor is controlled by an FPGA board (PCIe-7852, National Instruments). A linear stage (PLS-85, Physik Instrumente GmbH & Co. KG)translates the photoacoustic probe and the polygon scanner in a direction perpendicular with the polygon scanning direction, offering the slow scanning axis.

System characterization

Fig. 2(a) is a schematic showing the visible range in polygon scanning. The visible range is defined as the field where the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is greater than 8. Here, the SNR is the ratio of the PA amplitude and the standard deviation of the noise in the 2D image. We use a stainless-steel grating sample to measure the visible range. The grating sample has 300-μm-wide parallel strips with 100-μm spacing. B-scan images across the strips are acquired with 60-nJ pulse energy. We calculate the maximum amplitude of each A-line to obtain projected 1D profiles of the grating sample and compute the envelopes of the 1D profiles. Fig. 2(b) shows a measured envelope of the grating sample. The B-scan range is ∼12 mm.
Fig. 2

(a) Schematic of the B-scan range. (b) Normalized maximum-amplitude projection of a B-scan measured from a stainless steel grating sample. The visible range (SNR > 8) is ∼12 mm. (c) Calculated step sizes at different scanning positions. (d) Measured and fitted edge spread function (ESF) and derived line spread function (LSF) when the scanning beam is vertical. (e) Lateral resolutions at different scanning positions. (f) 36-μm axial resolution. (g) 0.97-mm penetration depth with an SNR of 2.

(a) Schematic of the B-scan range. (b) Normalized maximum-amplitude projection of a B-scan measured from a stainless steel grating sample. The visible range (SNR > 8) is ∼12 mm. (c) Calculated step sizes at different scanning positions. (d) Measured and fitted edge spread function (ESF) and derived line spread function (LSF) when the scanning beam is vertical. (e) Lateral resolutions at different scanning positions. (f) 36-μm axial resolution. (g) 0.97-mm penetration depth with an SNR of 2. The rotation speed of the polygon scanner is 4775 rounds per minute (rpm), corresponding to a B-scan rate of 477.5 Hz. Higher rotation speed is possible but may cause water splashing. When using a 1-MHz pulse repetition rate, the angular step size is 0.02865 degrees. Because the optical/acoustic path length varies at different angular positions, the translational scanning step size on the sample surface changes from 7.4 μm to 13.7 μm, as shown in Fig. 2(c). Because the laser beam scans in a wide range on the sample surface, the lateral resolution varies with the scanning position. We use edges on a stainless-steel grating sample to measure the lateral resolutions at different scanning positions. We measured the photoacoustic signal profiles across the sharp edges. The data are fitted to an edge spread function (error functions). Then the fitted edge spread functions are derived to obtain the line spread functions. The full widths at half maximum (FWHMs) of the line spread functions are calculated. Fig. 2(d) shows the measured resolution when the scanning beam is vertical. When scanning the beam, the optical beam may have an increased spot size on the sample, causing reduced lateral resolution. As shown in Fig. 2(e), from scanning center to edge in a B-scan, the lateral resolution changes from ∼6.3 μm to ∼21 μm. A tungsten filament with 25-μm diameter is used to measure the axial resolution. As shown in Fig. 2(f), the Hilbert-transformed A-line has an FWHM of ∼36 μm [41], which matches the theoretical value of 34 μm (1500-m/s speed of sound, 39-MHz bandwidth) [42]. Black human hair is inserted obliquely into fresh chicken breast tissue as shown in Fig. 2(g). The developed system can achieve a 0.97-mm penetration depth with an SNR of 2.

Results and discussion

Flowing microparticle imaging and in vivo mouse ear imaging

Flowing microparticles are imaged to demonstrate the high speed and large field of view. Iron particles (F1-01, 60 mesh, China Metallurgical Science and Engineering Group Co., Ltd.) with ∼250 μm diameter are mixed with water and then injected into a silicon tube. A syringe pump sets the average flow speed to 0.12 mm/s. Raster scanning is conducted over an area of 12 × 5 mm2 to image the particle flow. The step size along the x-axis (fast axis) is 7.4–13.7 μm, and the step size along the y-axis (slow axis) is 10 μm. The rotation speed of the fast axis is 4775 rpm, and the scanning speed on the slow axis is ∼ 4.8 mm/s in a 5-mm range. The 3D imaging speed is 1.04 s per frame. The laser pulse energy is 80 nJ on the sample surface. Fig. 3(a) shows the maximum-amplitude-projected snapshots of a microparticle flowing through the field of view (see Video 1). This phantom experiment shows fast imaging ability over a large field of view.
Fig. 3

(a) Snapshots of a microparticle flowing in a tube. The A-line rate is 1 MHz. The B-scan rate is 477.5 Hz, and the C-scan rate is ∼1 Hz. The scanning area is 12 × 5 mm2. (b) Snapshots of in vivo imaging of microvasculature in the mouse ear. The excitation wavelength is 532 nm. The scanning area is 12 × 12 mm2. A C-scan takes 5 s. (c) Imaging of sO2 at 1-MHz A-line rate in the mouse ear. The imaging size and speed are the same as in (b). The wavelengths are 532 nm and 558 nm.

(a) Snapshots of a microparticle flowing in a tube. The A-line rate is 1 MHz. The B-scan rate is 477.5 Hz, and the C-scan rate is ∼1 Hz. The scanning area is 12 × 5 mm2. (b) Snapshots of in vivo imaging of microvasculature in the mouse ear. The excitation wavelength is 532 nm. The scanning area is 12 × 12 mm2. A C-scan takes 5 s. (c) Imaging of sO2 at 1-MHz A-line rate in the mouse ear. The imaging size and speed are the same as in (b). The wavelengths are 532 nm and 558 nm. As shown in Fig. 3(b)-(c), we use polygon-scanning OR-PAM to image microvasculature and sO2 in the mouse ear. The animal experiments have been approved by the animal ethical committee of the City University of Hong Kong. The used laser pulse repetition rate is 1 MHz. The smallest step size in the x-axis is 7.4 μm, and the step size in the y-axis is 5 μm. The rotation speed of the polygon scanner is 4775 rpm. A single B-scan has 2094 A-lines for each wavelength and ∼1440 A-lines in the 12-mm scanning range. It takes ∼5 s to acquire a 12 × 12 mm2 image. For sO2 imaging, the pulse energies for 532 nm and 558 nm are 85 nJ and 64 nJ, which are below the safety limit of 20 mJ/cm2. Fig. 3(b) illustrates the microvasculature of the mouse ear. The highest SNRs in the trunk arteries and veins are 68.2 and 37.9. Using the 532-nm and 558-nm wavelengths, we image sO2 in the mouse ear at 1-MHz A-line rate. The delay time between the 532-nm and 558-nm pulses is 150 ns. In each A-line, we first calculate the maximum values of the two PA signals at the two wavelengths. Then sO2 is calculated from:Where are the photoacoustic amplitudes at the two wavelengths, and , are the molar extinction coefficients of oxy- and deoxy-hemoglobin molecules. are the optical fluence of at the two excitation wavelengths. The two wavelengths have a delay time of 150 ns. Although this time has been very short, it still causes misalignment between the two excitations in fast scanning. When the B-scan rate is 477.5 Hz, the 150-ns wavelength switching time can cause spatial misalignment of 1.1∼1.9 μm. This misalignment is smaller than the size of a red blood cell and the lateral resolution and thus is acceptable in the sO2 imaging. As shown in Fig. 3(c), the oxygen saturation in the arteries and veins can be differentiated. Because of the A-line-based ultrafast wavelength switching, the sO2 of the whole ear is imaged in a single scanning within 5 s.

Fast sO2 imaging

To demonstrate the new fast functional imaging ability, we image the change of hemoglobin concentration and sO2 after an intravenous epinephrine injection. Epinephrine can induce rapid vasoconstriction or dilation in different organs and change blood circulation and sO2 [43,44]. In the experiment of fast sO2 imaging, the pulse repetition rate is 1 MHz, and the B-scan rate is 477.5 Hz. It takes 5 s to acquire a volumetric image. The mouse ear is imaged every 20 s and is monitored for 11 min. Before the epinephrine injection, an image of the entire mouse ear is imaged as the baseline. Then, 10 μg epinephrine is injected into the caudal vein. The sO2 value is first calculated at each pixel using Eq. (1) and then smoothed within 3 × 3 pixels. The 532-nm images and sO2 images are presented with the time change in videos respectively. Fig. 4(a) shows the increased PA amplitude at 532 nm at a different time compared with the PA image before injection. Fig. 4(b) shows that the sO2 exhibits obvious changes after the epinephrine injection (see Video 2 and Video 3). Especially, we can observe the sO2 increase in veins. These results confirm that the epinephrine injection effectively promotes blood circulation in the ear.
Fig. 4

(a) Percentage change of PA amplitude of the mouse ear after epinephrine injection. The baseline is the image at time 0 before injection. (b) sO2 images of the mouse ear after epinephrine injection. (c) Positions of the arteries used to average the arteries’ PA and sO2 values. (d) Other vessels except for the extracted arteries. (e) PA change at 532 nm averaged over the extracted arteries (circles) and other vessels (stars) at different times. (f) sO2 change averaged over the extracted arteries (circles) and other vessels (stars) at different times.

(a) Percentage change of PA amplitude of the mouse ear after epinephrine injection. The baseline is the image at time 0 before injection. (b) sO2 images of the mouse ear after epinephrine injection. (c) Positions of the arteries used to average the arteries’ PA and sO2 values. (d) Other vessels except for the extracted arteries. (e) PA change at 532 nm averaged over the extracted arteries (circles) and other vessels (stars) at different times. (f) sO2 change averaged over the extracted arteries (circles) and other vessels (stars) at different times. We quantify the changes in the averaged PA amplitude and sO2 in the arteries and other vessels. The arteries are separated from other vessels by comparing the sO2 values with a threshold of 0.92. The separated arteries and other vessels are shown in Fig. 4(c) and (d). Compared to the baseline before the epinephrine injection, the averaged PA amplitudes in the separated arteries and other vessels increases by similar amounts, i.e., 50 % and 56 %, in 11 min. But their change rates are different during this period. The PA amplitude change rate in the arteries is higher in the first ∼180 s than the rest of the time; the averaged value in other vessels rises faster after ∼400 s. The average sO2 of the arteries shows a small increase of ∼0.012. In other vessels, the sO2 gradually increases from ∼0.78 to ∼0.85 (Fig. 4(e) and (f)). The sO2 increases less in the arteries than in other vessels.

Conclusion

We present the development of wide-field fast-scanning functional OR-PAM at 1-MHz A-line rate. Two technical advances, the 1-MHz dual-wavelength pulsed laser and the fast polygon-scanning OR-PAM probe, enable the new imaging ability. The dual-wavelength pulsed laser is developed based on stimulated Raman scattering and fiber-based optical delay. The laser offers a suitable light source for fast functional OR-PAM because of the following advantages. First, the laser has a 1-MHz pulse repetition rate for both wavelengths. Second, the fiber-based optical delay enables 150-ns pulse-by-pulse wavelength switching. Third, the pulse energy for each wavelength is above 65 nJ on the sample surface and is enough for in vivo imaging with acceptable sensitivity. The water-immersible polygon scanner has several advantages. First, the B-scan rate can be as fast as 477.5 Hz underwater. Second, the scanning range is up to 12 mm. Third, the reflective scanning mirror can maintain confocal alignment between the excitation and detection beams, achieving high sensitivity, and thus enables the use of relatively low pulse energy for in vivo imaging. We demonstrate fast imaging of flowing microparticles every one second over a field of view of 12 × 5 mm2. For in vivo experiments, we can acquire a sO2 image in 5 s over a 12 × 12 mm2 scanning area. This demonstrates the high speed, large field of view, and good sensitivity of the system. Enabled by the fast functional imaging ability, we image the sO2 changes after epinephrine injection over a large area. The polygon-scanning functional OR-PAM offers an improved tool for biomedical imaging.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
  37 in total

1.  Raman-shifted wavelength-selectable pulsed fiber laser with high repetition rate and high pulse energy in the visible.

Authors:  L Xu; S Alam; Q Kang; D P Shepherd; D J Richardson
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Multiparametric photoacoustic microscopy of the mouse brain with 300-kHz A-line rate.

Authors:  Tianxiong Wang; Naidi Sun; Rui Cao; Bo Ning; Ruimin Chen; Qifa Zhou; Song Hu
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.593

3.  Single-cell label-free photoacoustic flowoxigraphy in vivo.

Authors:  Lidai Wang; Konstantin Maslov; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Large-field-of-view optical resolution photoacoustic microscopy.

Authors:  Wei Qin; Tian Jin; Heng Guo; Lei Xi
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Increased cortical cerebral blood flow by continuous infusion of adrenaline (epinephrine) during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Jakob Johansson; Rolf Gedeborg; Samar Basu; Sten Rubertsson
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  Photoacoustic temperature imaging based on multi-wavelength excitation.

Authors:  Lei Meng; Olivier Deschaume; Lionel Larbanoix; Eduard Fron; Carmen Bartic; Sophie Laurent; Mark Van der Auweraer; Christ Glorieux
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2018-11-22

7.  Photoacoustic-based oxygen saturation assessment of murine femoral bone marrow in a preclinical model of leukemia.

Authors:  Cayla Wood; Karine Harutyunyan; Diego R T Sampaio; Marina Konopleva; Richard Bouchard
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2019-02-20

Review 8.  A review of clinical photoacoustic imaging: Current and future trends.

Authors:  Amalina Binte Ebrahim Attia; Ghayathri Balasundaram; Mohesh Moothanchery; U S Dinish; Renzhe Bi; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Malini Olivo
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2019-11-07

9.  Single-shot linear dichroism optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy.

Authors:  Yingying Zhou; Jiangbo Chen; Chao Liu; Chengbo Liu; Puxiang Lai; Lidai Wang
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2019-11-19

10.  Multi-wavelength photoacoustic imaging of inducible tyrosinase reporter gene expression in xenograft tumors.

Authors:  Robert J Paproski; Andrew Heinmiller; Keith Wachowicz; Roger J Zemp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Practical review on photoacoustic computed tomography using curved ultrasound array transducer.

Authors:  Jinge Yang; Seongwook Choi; Chulhong Kim
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2021-12-19

2.  Low-cost high-resolution photoacoustic microscopy of blood oxygenation with two laser diodes.

Authors:  Xiufeng Li; Kylie Yeung; Victor T C Tsang; Bingxin Huang; Claudia T K Lo; Terence T W Wong
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 3.  Functional photoacoustic microscopy of hemodynamics: a review.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Lidai Wang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2022-04-10

4.  Performance comparison of high-speed photoacoustic microscopy: opto-ultrasound combiner versus ring-shaped ultrasound transducer.

Authors:  Hyojin Kim; Jin Young Kim; Seonghee Cho; Joongho Ahn; Yeonggeun Kim; Hyungham Kim; Chulhong Kim
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2022-03-02

5.  Freehand scanning photoacoustic microscopy with simultaneous localization and mapping.

Authors:  Jiangbo Chen; Yachao Zhang; Jingyi Zhu; Xu Tang; Lidai Wang
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2022-10-07

6.  Recovery of photoacoustic images based on accurate ultrasound positioning.

Authors:  Yinhao Pan; Ningbo Chen; Liangjian Liu; Chengbo Liu; Zhiqiang Xu; Jianhui Zhang
Journal:  Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art       Date:  2021-03-25

7.  Classification and discrimination of real and fake blood based on photoacoustic spectroscopy combined with particle swarm optimized wavelet neural networks.

Authors:  Zhong Ren; Tao Liu; Guodong Liu
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2021-06-01

8.  Ultra-widefield photoacoustic microscopy with a dual-channel slider-crank laser-scanning apparatus for in vivo biomedical study.

Authors:  Van Tu Nguyen; Nguyen Thanh Phong Truong; Van Hiep Pham; Jaeyeop Choi; Sumin Park; Cao Duong Ly; Soon-Woo Cho; Sudip Mondal; Hae Gyun Lim; Chang-Seok Kim; Junghwan Oh
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2021-05-15

9.  High-resolution functional photoacoustic monitoring of vascular dynamics in human fingers.

Authors:  Joongho Ahn; Jin Young Kim; Wonseok Choi; Chulhong Kim
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2021-06-25

10.  Perspective on fast-evolving photoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Junjie Yao; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 3.170

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.