Literature DB >> 31049286

Photoacoustic-based oxygen saturation assessment of murine femoral bone marrow in a preclinical model of leukemia.

Cayla Wood1,2, Karine Harutyunyan3, Diego R T Sampaio4, Marina Konopleva3,2, Richard Bouchard1,2.   

Abstract

A variety of hematological diseases manifest in the bone marrow (BM), broadly characterized as BM failure (BMF). BMF can be caused by acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), which results in an expansion of hypoxic regions in the BM. Because of this hypoxic presentation, there is potential for improved characterization of BMF through in vivo assessment of oxygenation in the BM cavity. Photoacoustic (PA) imaging can provide local assessment of intravascular oxygen saturation (SO2), which has been shown to correlate with pimonidazole-assessed hypoxia. This study introduces an optimized PA imaging technique to assess SO2 within the femoral BM cavity through disease progression in a murine model of ALL. Results show a statistically significant difference with temporal changes in SO2 (from baseline) between control and diseased cohorts, demonstrating the potential of PA imaging for noninvasive, label-free monitoring of BMF diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute lymphoblastic leukemia; Bone marrow; Photoacoustic imaging; Preclinical imaging; SO2 estimation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31049286      PMCID: PMC6484208          DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2019.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photoacoustics        ISSN: 2213-5979


Introduction

A variety of hematological diseases manifest in the bone marrow (BM), broadly characterized as BM failure (BMF), defined as an abnormality in erythroid, megakaryocytic, and monocyte cell lineages [1,2]. In some cases, BMF can be caused by acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), in which ALL cells engraft in BM, leading to hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) induction in the BM niche [3,4]. This results in an expansion of hypoxic regions, which allows leukemic cells to infiltrate further, compromising normal hematopoietic cells [5]. Consequently, diagnosis and treatment of many hematological diseases stand to benefit from accurate characterization of BMF through assessment of in vivo oxygenation in the BM. Current clinical methods to probe hypoxia, which is a lack of oxygen availability to cells, include (18F-FAZA)-PET imaging, BOLD-MRI, TOLD-MRI, and 19F-MRI. (18F-FAZA)-PET imaging has shown correlation with hypoxia immunostaining [6]; however, it requires injection of a radiotracer and suffers from inherently poor spatiotemporal resolution. BOLD-MRI is a label-free technique that suffers from quantitation issues, particularly at tissue-bone interfaces, due to susceptibility artifacts [7,8]. Although not affected by such artifacts, TOLD-MRI’s limited sensitivity has failed to provide substantial signal change in BM [9,10]. 19F-MRI requires a perfluorocarbon exogenous reporter and additional imaging equipment that is not standard on an MRI scanner to generate dynamic pO2 maps [11,12]. Preclinical methods to detect intracellular hypoxia include histological techniques (e.g., pimonidazole immunohistochemistry) and multiphoton intravital microscopy to probe carbonic anhydrase IX, a direct HIF-1α target [13,14]. However, these techniques require an exogenous agent and are generally limited to sampling a single time-point [15]. To date, there is no established method for in vivo, label-free, noninvasive, quantitative imaging of oxygenation in BM. Photoacoustic (PA) imaging is a noninvasive, label-free, in vivo imaging technique with high spatiotemporal resolution that provides optical contrast at significantly greater depths than purely optical techniques [16,17]. Intravascular oxygen saturation (SO2) can be estimated through PA-based assessment of oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin (HbO2 and HHb, respectively) [18]. Although SO2 is not a direct measure of intracellular hypoxia, it has been shown to be correlated with pimonidazole-assessed hypoxia and pO2 levels proximal to capillaries [19,20]. Therefore, we hypothesize that SO2 can serve as a noninvasive and label-free biomarker for leukemic disease progression and treatment response. This work demonstrates an optimized longitudinal PA imaging technique to probe the oxygenation status of the femoral BM. Results from a preclinical pilot study show that temporal changes in intrafemoral SO2 correlate with ALL disease progression.

Materials and methods

Mouse model

All animal work was performed in accordance with a protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. A transgenic murine leukemic BM cell (LBC) line was generated from murine Ai14/CD19-Cre BM B-cells that express TdTomato [13]. These cells were retrovirally transduced with the p190/Bcr-Abl oncogene and grown in cell culture for transduction with the Luciferase retrovirus [13]. 2 × 105 LBCs were then suspended in PBS and inoculated intravenously into six- to eight-week-old B6-albino mice (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME). Engraftment was confirmed with bioluminescence imaging (BLI) at least 2 days post-injection (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

(A) Setup for PA imaging in MSOT inVision 256-TF. Mice are positioned as shown in orange dashed box, then placed in the scanner for imaging. Scan range is set to include the extent of both femurs (red volume; middle imaging frame indicated by green outline). Wavelengths were selected based on the HbO2 and HHb extinction spectra, as shown. Volume stack of PA images with corresponding noise images at (B),(D) 715 nm and (C),(E) 880 nm. Unmixed axial images with (F) HbO2 and HHb overlaid 800-nm image and (G) SO2 image. (H) SNR-masked SO2 image overlaid 800-nm image. Matched BLI at (I) day 4 and (J) day 11, showing increase in cell engraftment in femurs as disease progresses. Timeline at the bottom shows imaging time-points, with PA imaging indicated by blue circles and BLI indicated by green diamonds.

(A) Setup for PA imaging in MSOT inVision 256-TF. Mice are positioned as shown in orange dashed box, then placed in the scanner for imaging. Scan range is set to include the extent of both femurs (red volume; middle imaging frame indicated by green outline). Wavelengths were selected based on the HbO2 and HHb extinction spectra, as shown. Volume stack of PA images with corresponding noise images at (B),(D) 715 nm and (C),(E) 880 nm. Unmixed axial images with (F) HbO2 and HHb overlaid 800-nm image and (G) SO2 image. (H) SNR-masked SO2 image overlaid 800-nm image. Matched BLI at (I) day 4 and (J) day 11, showing increase in cell engraftment in femurs as disease progresses. Timeline at the bottom shows imaging time-points, with PA imaging indicated by blue circles and BLI indicated by green diamonds.

Imaging acquisition

All PA imaging was performed on the MSOT inVision 256-TF imaging system (iThera Medical, Munich, DEU), which has a 256-element, 270°-arc acoustic-receiver array with 5 laser-fiber-bundle pairs for PA signal generation. Images are acquired axially (Fig. 1B–C), and the mouse is translated in the z-axis to obtain volumetric data. The wavelengths used in this study included 715, 730, 760, 800, 850, and 880 nm; at least 10 frame-averages were used for all acquisitions. Water temperature was maintained at 34 °C; mice were anesthetized with 1.2% isoflurane delivered via 100% oxygen at a flow rate of 0.8 L/min. Fur was removed with Nair prior to imaging, and a thin layer of ultrasound gel was applied to improve acoustic coupling. Measures were taken to ensure repeatability of animal setup between imaging sessions. For the first time-point, the mouse was positioned with its hind limbs in the ankle cuffs and extended as far as reasonable (Fig. 1A). This position was recorded to place the mouse in the same location at subsequent time-points. Mice were imaged over a 25 mm volume with a 0.2 mm step size, resulting in a scan time around 12 min; the scan volume included the full extent of both femurs, with extra frames superior and inferior to ensure the entire femur was sampled. After all PA data were acquired, images were reconstructed by iterative reconstruction using the ViewMSOT software package (v.3.8, iThera Medical). Images were then unmixed for HbO2 and HHb using linear regression, and voxel-wise SO2 was calculated as the ratio of HbO2 to total hemoglobin [21]. Unless otherwise stated, reported SO2 values are defined as the average within a region of interest (ROI) encompassing the noted anatomy (i.e., intra-ROI mean).

CT/PA co-registration

To verify that observed PA signals originated in the femoral BM, control mice were imaged on both the MSOT and the AlbiraSi X-ray CT (Bruker, Billerica, MA) imaging systems, verifying matched animal positioning with anatomical fiducials. 3D PA image data were then manually co-registered with 3D X-ray CT image data to determine whether the hemoglobin signal visible in PA images co-located with the BM cavity. Additionally, a noise threshold was applied to PA images to verify that only pixels with signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) >6 dB were included in analysis [22].

System characterization

To determine the optimal imaging parameters, it was necessary to balance scan time with SO2 estimation precision. Scan time increases linearly with wavelength number and frame-averaging; precision tends to maintain a nonlinear relationship with these parameters. Imaging-wavelength combinations (table, Fig. 3) were assessed with 10-, 15-, and 20-frame averages in a wild-type (“control”) mouse. Optimization was then determined based on the minimum of a cost function:where σ is the standard deviation in femoral-artery SO2 (SaO2) estimates (to assess measurement precision) and nAvg is the number of employed frame-averages (weighted more heavily to minimize scan time for noticeably frail leukemic mice). To obtain σ, four axial locations were imaged using parameters detailed in 2.2. SaO2 was obtained from an ROI encompassing the femoral artery; σ was then calculated as the standard deviation of SaO2 across the axial locations. The femoral artery was selected for this analysis because it is a known value (i.e., the mouse is breathing 100% O2, so we expect SaO2 near 100%) and is a clear anatomical marker in PA images.
Fig. 3

(A) Plot of cost function for all tested acquisition parameters. Wavelength combinations are shown in the table on the top right. PA-based (B) SfO2 for a representative control mouse and (C) for control cohort. The average across the femoral extent for all time-points are summarized in the table on the bottom right.

Based on this optimization, three controls were imaged over five time-points (timeline, Fig. 1) with six wavelengths and 15-frame averaging. Femoral-BM SO2 (SfO2) was obtained from ROIs placed over femoral- BM signals in 800-nm axial PA images. SfO2 for each mouse was assessed over the length of the femur (“femoral extent”) for all five time-points; intra-ROI standard deviation was also calculated to ensure that ROI placement was correct. Then, to compare SfO2 across all controls, the intra-cohort mean and standard deviation ( and , respectively) were assessed over the femoral extent for all time-points.

Leukemia pilot study

A pilot study was performed to compare temporal differences in between control and leukemic mice through disease progression. Five mice were inoculated with LBCs, as described in 2.1 (“leukemic”); three were not injected (“controls”). Each mouse was imaged at five time-points: pre-inoculation, and days 4, 7, 11, and 14 post-inoculation. Controls were imaged as described in 2.4; leukemic mice were imaged similarly with six wavelengths, but with 10-frame averaging to reduce imaging time for the frail leukemic cohort. BLI was performed at each post-inoculation time-point to track leukemic cell engraftment. and were compared between cohorts at each time-point; statistical significance was determined by a two-tailed t-test (α = 0.05). Additionally, absolute changes in SfO2 were assessed relative to baseline for each mouse, and the intra-cohort mean of these changes (; e.g., | Day11 – Day0|) was assessed; statistical significance was determined by a two-way repeated measures ANOVA (α = 0.05). Day 14 results were excluded from analysis because leukemic mice had experienced paralysis and >10% loss in body mass, which significantly confounded SfO2 measurements.

Results and discussion

Co-registered PA and CT images of a control mouse demonstrate colocalization of the femoral PA (i.e., hemoglobin) signal and the CT-delineated BM cavity (Fig. 2C). The BM PA signal appears diffuse due to intra-cavity sound reverberation. Additionally, the applied SNR threshold helped to better delineate the femoral-BM PA signal (Fig. 2D).
Fig. 2

(A) Axial PA image in a representative mouse showing 800-nm background (grayscale) with HbO2 (red) and HHb (blue) unmixed overlay with signal from femoral BM (indicated by teal circles); (B) matched X-ray CT to show anatomy. (C) Overlay of X-ray CT on PA image shows that the hemoglobin signal seen in the PA image co-locates with the BM cavity seen on X-ray CT, indicating that the signal originated in the BM. Femoral arteries are indicated by red circles. (D) SNR-masked SO2 image overlaid on 800-nm PA image demonstrates that sufficient SNR is achieved in the BM cavity to reliably estimate femoral SO2.

(A) Axial PA image in a representative mouse showing 800-nm background (grayscale) with HbO2 (red) and HHb (blue) unmixed overlay with signal from femoral BM (indicated by teal circles); (B) matched X-ray CT to show anatomy. (C) Overlay of X-ray CT on PA image shows that the hemoglobin signal seen in the PA image co-locates with the BM cavity seen on X-ray CT, indicating that the signal originated in the BM. Femoral arteries are indicated by red circles. (D) SNR-masked SO2 image overlaid on 800-nm PA image demonstrates that sufficient SNR is achieved in the BM cavity to reliably estimate femoral SO2. Optimized wavelength/averaging combinations were determined based on minima of the cost function (Eq. (1)), which selected 6-wavelength unmixing and either 10- or 15-frame averaging (red circles, Fig. 3A). Using these parameters, control mice were imaged over five time-points to assess temporal variability of . The average of estimates across the femoral extent and all time-points was 46.1 ± 1.0%. Spatial dependence in SfO2 is evident across the femoral extent: SfO2 tends to increase towards the distal end (Fig. 3B,C). This could be attributed to differences in depths of femoral-BM PA signals as there is more soft tissue surrounding the proximal end than the distal end. Varying depths could affect the accuracy of HbO2 and HHb unmixing (due to wavelength-dependent optical attenuation [18]) and therefore change the calculated SfO2. However, day-to-day SfO2 estimates in each frame showed less than 2.4% SfO2 variation in each subject, implying that this effect is temporally stable and thus allows for longitudinal assessment of other factors, such as disease progression. (A) Plot of cost function for all tested acquisition parameters. Wavelength combinations are shown in the table on the top right. PA-based (B) SfO2 for a representative control mouse and (C) for control cohort. The average across the femoral extent for all time-points are summarized in the table on the bottom right. At day 0 in the leukemic cohort, averaged over the femoral extent was 45.8%; at day 11, this reduced to 36.8%. Additionally, leukemic averaged over the femoral extent increased from 5.2% at day 0 to 10.2% at day 11 (shaded regions, Fig. 4). Neither of these changes was statistically significant. As BM hypoxia increases, the expectation would be for SfO2 to decrease; however, as demonstrated by the high at day 11, some leukemic mice experienced increased SfO2 with disease progression relative to baseline, while others experienced decreased SfO2. This indicates that although hypoxia and SfO2 are correlated, they are not directly related. SfO2 assesses vascular oxygenation, whereas hypoxia exists further downstream in the extravascular compartment and can be caused by a variety of biological effects (i.e., abnormalities in vasculature or sufficient diffusion distance [23]), which cannot be discerned from SfO2 assessment alone.
Fig. 4

PA-based femoral SO2 for control (blue) and leukemic (red) mice at (A) day 0, (B) day 4, (C) day 7, and (D) day 11. Each line shows for the cohort, and shaded regions indicate for the cohort.

PA-based femoral SO2 for control (blue) and leukemic (red) mice at (A) day 0, (B) day 4, (C) day 7, and (D) day 11. Each line shows for the cohort, and shaded regions indicate for the cohort. Fig. 5 shows plots of across the femoral extent. Statistical significance was assessed separately in three regions: the proximal end, the femoral body, and the distal end. There was a statistically significant difference in between the leukemic and control cohorts in the femoral body region (asterisks, Fig. 5). Therefore, it may be necessary to measure subject-specific temporal changes in SfO2 to be sensitive to changes in leukemic disease progression.
Fig. 5

for (A) day 4 – day 0, (B) day 7 – day 0, and (C) day 11 – day 0. There is a statistically significant difference between controls (blue) and leukemic (red) mice in the middle region of the femur, as indicated by * (Repeated Measures Two-Way ANOVA; α = 0.05), between leukemic and control cohorts.

for (A) day 4 – day 0, (B) day 7 – day 0, and (C) day 11 – day 0. There is a statistically significant difference between controls (blue) and leukemic (red) mice in the middle region of the femur, as indicated by * (Repeated Measures Two-Way ANOVA; α = 0.05), between leukemic and control cohorts. In future studies, contrast may be further improved by varying oxygen inhalation conditions (e.g., 100% and 21% O2), a method that has been demonstrated in other disease models [24]. Additionally, SfO2 measurements at the final time-point could be correlated with hypoxia through immunohistochemical analysis, which is established for this disease model [13]. These studies will help further discern the relationship between and leukemic disease progression. PA-based SfO2 assessment could, in turn, be used as a preclinical assay to assess the efficacy of novel ALL treatments currently under investigation [25]. Furthermore, this assay could be applied to a variety of BMF applications, particularly aplastic anemia, in which there is a reduction in hematopoietic production [2]. Although clinical PA-based measurements in BM may be difficult, some sites (e.g., appendages) could be imaged with an arc-array, which offers an increased receive angle for improved sensitivity [26]. This would be particularly applicable to pediatric patients, whose bones are thinner and more readily permit one-way transmission of PA-generated US signal out of the BM cavity [27,28].

Conclusions

This work presents an optimized in vivo, noninvasive, label-free PA imaging technique for SfO2 estimation, demonstrating a repeated-measure variability of less than 2.4% in a control cohort. This technique was applied to a pilot cohort of leukemic mice, and temporal changes in SfO2 demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with leukemic disease progression. PA-based SfO2 imaging is able to reliably assess changes in BM oxygenation status, an emerging imaging biomarker that has potential to provide valuable insight into many hematological diseases that manifest as BMF.

Author statement

Cayla Wood: Methodology, Software, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing. Karine Harutyunyan: Methodology, Resources, Writing – Review & Editing. Diego Sampaio: Software, Formal Analysis. Marina Konopleva: Supervision, Funding Acquisition, Writing – Review & Editing. Richard Bouchard: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing.
  23 in total

Review 1.  Technical aspects and utility of fMRI using BOLD and ASL.

Authors:  John A Detre; Jiongjiong Wang
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  [Quantification and visualization of oxygen partial pressure in vivo by 19F NMR imaging of perfluorocarbons].

Authors:  M E Bellemann; J Brückner; P Peschke; G Brix; R P Mason
Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.411

Review 3.  Hypoxia in cancer: significance and impact on clinical outcome.

Authors:  Peter Vaupel; Arnulf Mayer
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 9.264

4.  Detecting changes in tumor hypoxia with carbonic anhydrase IX and pimonidazole.

Authors:  Kyung Hwan Shin; Juan A Diaz-Gonzalez; James Russell; Qing Chen; Paul Burgman; Xiao-Feng Li; C Clifton Ling
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 5.  Problems of bone analysis in childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  E Schönau
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 6.  Ultrasound-guided photoacoustic imaging: current state and future development.

Authors:  Richard Bouchard; Onur Sahin; Stanislav Emelianov
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Dedicated 3D photoacoustic breast imaging.

Authors:  Robert A Kruger; Cherie M Kuzmiak; Richard B Lam; Daniel R Reinecke; Stephen P Del Rio; Doreen Steed
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Advances in understanding the acute lymphoblastic leukemia bone marrow microenvironment: From biology to therapeutic targeting.

Authors:  Francesca Chiarini; Annalisa Lonetti; Camilla Evangelisti; Francesca Buontempo; Ester Orsini; Cecilia Evangelisti; Alessandra Cappellini; Luca M Neri; James A McCubrey; Alberto M Martelli
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-09-01

9.  Hypoxia-Activated Prodrug TH-302 Targets Hypoxic Bone Marrow Niches in Preclinical Leukemia Models.

Authors:  Juliana Benito; Marc S Ramirez; Niki Zacharias Millward; Juliana Velez; Karine G Harutyunyan; Hongbo Lu; Yue-Xi Shi; Polina Matre; Rodrigo Jacamo; Helen Ma; Sergej Konoplev; Teresa McQueen; Andrei Volgin; Marina Protopopova; Hong Mu; Jaehyuk Lee; Pratip K Bhattacharya; Joseph R Marszalek; R Eric Davis; James A Bankson; Jorge E Cortes; Charles P Hart; Michael Andreeff; Marina Konopleva
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Photoacoustic imaging driven by an interstitial irradiation source.

Authors:  Trevor Mitcham; Katherine Dextraze; Houra Taghavi; Marites Melancon; Richard Bouchard
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2015-03-14
View more
  7 in total

1.  Wide-field polygon-scanning photoacoustic microscopy of oxygen saturation at 1-MHz A-line rate.

Authors:  Jiangbo Chen; Yachao Zhang; Linyun He; Yizhi Liang; Lidai Wang
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2020-06-07

2.  Estimating blood oxygenation from photoacoustic images: can a simple linear spectroscopic inversion ever work?

Authors:  Roman Hochuli; Lu An; Paul C Beard; Benjamin T Cox
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Characterization of multi-biomarkers for bone health assessment based on photoacoustic physicochemical analysis method.

Authors:  Ting Feng; Yejing Xie; Weiya Xie; Yingna Chen; Peng Wang; Lan Li; Jing Han; Dean Ta; Liming Cheng; Qian Cheng
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2021-12-14

4.  Clinically translatable quantitative molecular photoacoustic imaging with liposome-encapsulated ICG J-aggregates.

Authors:  Konstantin V Sokolov; Richard R Bouchard; Cayla A Wood; Sangheon Han; Chang Soo Kim; Yunfei Wen; Diego R T Sampaio; Justin T Harris; Kimberly A Homan; Jody L Swain; Stanislav Y Emelianov; Anil K Sood; Jason R Cook
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Myocardial infarct border demarcation by dual-wavelength photoacoustic spectral analysis.

Authors:  Kangmu Ma; Shiying Wu; Shixing Huang; Weiya Xie; Mengjiao Zhang; Yingna Chen; Pengxiong Zhu; Jun Liu; Qian Cheng
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2022-03-05

6.  Photoacoustic imaging for the study of oxygen saturation and total hemoglobin in bone healing and non-union formation.

Authors:  Maximilian M Menger; Christina Körbel; David Bauer; Michelle Bleimehl; Anne L Tobias; Benedikt J Braun; Steven C Herath; Mika F Rollmann; Matthias W Laschke; Michael D Menger; Tina Histing
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2022-09-27

Review 7.  Types of spectroscopy and microscopy techniques for cancer diagnosis: a review.

Authors:  Sindhoora Kaniyala Melanthota; Yury V Kistenev; Ekaterina Borisova; Deyan Ivanov; Olga Zakharova; Andrey Boyko; Denis Vrazhnov; Dharshini Gopal; Shweta Chakrabarti; Shama Prasada K; Nirmal Mazumder
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.