Literature DB >> 35529340

Performance comparison of high-speed photoacoustic microscopy: opto-ultrasound combiner versus ring-shaped ultrasound transducer.

Hyojin Kim1, Jin Young Kim1, Seonghee Cho1, Joongho Ahn1, Yeonggeun Kim1, Hyungham Kim1, Chulhong Kim1.   

Abstract

Photoacoustic microscopy (PAM) embedded with a 532 nm pulse laser is widely used to visualize the microvascular structures in both small animals and humans in vivo. An opto-ultrasound combiner (OUC) is often utilized in high-speed PAM to confocally align the optical and acoustic beams to improve the system's sensitivity. However, acoustic impedance mismatch in the OUC results in little improvement in the sensitivity. Alternatively, a ring-shaped ultrasound transducer (RUT) can also accomplish the confocal configuration. Here, we compare the performance of OUC and RUT modules through ultrasound pulse-echo tests and PA imaging experiments. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the RUT-based system were 15 dB, 12 dB, and 7 dB higher when compared to the OUC-based system for ultrasound pulse-echo test, PA phantom imaging test, and PA in-vivo imaging test, respectively. In addition, the RUT-based system could image the microvascular structures of small parts of a mouse body in a few seconds with minimal loss in SNR. Thus, with increased sensitivity, improved image details, and fast image acquisition, we believe the RUT-based systems could play a significant role in the design of future fast-PAM systems. © Korean Society of Medical and Biological Engineering 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Opto-ultrasound combiner; Performance comparison; Photoacoustic microscopy; Ring-shaped ultrasound transducer; Sensitivity; Signal-to-noise ratio

Year:  2022        PMID: 35529340      PMCID: PMC9046515          DOI: 10.1007/s13534-022-00218-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett        ISSN: 2093-9868


  38 in total

1.  Multimodal photoacoustic imaging: systems, applications, and agents.

Authors:  Chulhong Kim; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2018-05-10

2.  Multiscale photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography.

Authors:  Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Nat Photonics       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 38.771

3.  In Vivo Photoacoustic Imaging of Anterior Ocular Vasculature: A Random Sample Consensus Approach.

Authors:  Seungwan Jeon; Hyun Beom Song; Jaewoo Kim; Byung Joo Lee; Ravi Managuli; Jin Hyoung Kim; Jeong Hun Kim; Chulhong Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Handheld Photoacoustic Microscopy Probe.

Authors:  Kyungjin Park; Jin Young Kim; Changho Lee; Seungwan Jeon; Geunbae Lim; Chulhong Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Photoacoustic microscopy reveals the hemodynamic basis of sphingosine 1-phosphate-induced neuroprotection against ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Rui Cao; Jun Li; Yugesh Kharel; Chenchu Zhang; Emily Morris; Webster L Santos; Kevin R Lynch; Zhiyi Zuo; Song Hu
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 11.556

6.  Enhanced contrast acoustic-resolution photoacoustic microscopy using double-stage delay-multiply-and-sum beamformer for vasculature imaging.

Authors:  Moein Mozaffarzadeh; Mehdi H H Varnosfaderani; Arunima Sharma; Manojit Pramanik; Nico de Jong; Martin D Verweij
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.207

7.  Quadruple ultrasound, photoacoustic, optical coherence, and fluorescence fusion imaging with a transparent ultrasound transducer.

Authors:  Jeongwoo Park; Byullee Park; Tae Yeong Kim; Sungjin Jung; Woo June Choi; Joongho Ahn; Dong Hee Yoon; Jeongho Kim; Seungwan Jeon; Donghyun Lee; Uijung Yong; Jinah Jang; Won Jong Kim; Hong Kyun Kim; Unyong Jeong; Hyung Ham Kim; Chulhong Kim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Multiparametric Photoacoustic Analysis of Human Thyroid Cancers In Vivo.

Authors:  Jeesu Kim; Byullee Park; Jeonghoon Ha; Idan Steinberg; Sarah M Hooper; Chaiho Jeong; Eun-Yeong Park; Wonseok Choi; Tie Liang; Ja Seong Bae; Ravi Managuli; Yongmin Kim; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Dong-Jun Lim; Chulhong Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  3D PHOVIS: 3D photoacoustic visualization studio.

Authors:  Seonghee Cho; Jinwoo Baik; Ravi Managuli; Chulhong Kim
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2020-03-10

10.  Single-shot photoacoustic microscopy of hemoglobin concentration, oxygen saturation, and blood flow in sub-microseconds.

Authors:  Chao Liu; Yizhi Liang; Lidai Wang
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2019-12-26
View more
  1 in total

1.  Enhancing optoacoustic mesoscopy through calibration-based iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Urs A T Hofmann; Weiye Li; Xosé Luís Deán-Ben; Pavel Subochev; Héctor Estrada; Daniel Razansky
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2022-09-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.