Well-Defined, Molecular Bismuth Compounds: Catalysts in Photochemically Induced Radical Dehydrocoupling Reactions.

A series of diorgano(bismuth)chalcogenides, [Bi(di-aryl)EPh], has been synthesised and fully characterised (E=S, Se, Te). These molecular bismuth complexes have been exploited in homogeneous photochemically-induced radical catalysis, using the coupling of silanes with TEMPO as a model reaction (TEMPO=(tetramethyl-piperidin-1-yl)-oxyl). Their catalytic properties are complementary or superior to those of known catalysts for these coupling reactions. Catalytically competent intermediates of the reaction have been identified. Applied analytical techniques include NMR, UV/Vis, and EPR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis, and (TD)-DFT calculations.

Covalent bonds Z−X with a heavy p‐block element Z as one of the bonding partners show low homolytic bond dissociation energies due to inefficient spatial and energetic overlap of the relevant atomic orbitals. This allows access to reversible homolytic bond dissociations (Z−X⇄Z.+X.) under mild reaction conditions, which is a key feature for potential catalytic applications via radical pathways. For instance, equilibrium scenarios have been reported for the homolysis of the Sn≡Sn bond in (SnAr)2 and the Pn−Pn bonds in (Pn(CSiMe3CH2)2)2 (Ar=C6H3‐2,6‐(C6H3‐2,6‐iPr2)2; Pn=Sb, Bi).[ , ] Such findings have paved the way for new catalytic applications of well‐defined, molecular complexes of heavy p‐block elements in radical reactions. Among potential catalysts of this kind, bismuth compounds in particular are attractive synthetic targets due to characteristics such as low cost, (relatively) low toxicity, and prospects for recyclability.[ , ] In this context, the radical dehydrocoupling of SiPhH3 and TEMPO with [Bi(NONDipp)]. and the radical cyclo‐isomerisation of δ‐iodo‐olefins with Ph2Bi‐Mn(CO)5 have recently been reported (Scheme 1; TEMPO=(tetramethylpiperidin‐1‐yl)‐oxyl; NONDipp=O(SiMe2NDipp)2, Dipp=2,6‐iPr2C6H3).[ , ] While these reactions are thermally‐initiated, photochemically‐induced transformations represent an important complementary approach to radical catalysis. Indeed, a range of inorganic bismuth compounds such as (nanostructured) oxides (Bi2O3), titanates (Bi4Ti3O12), vanadates (BiVO4), halide perovskites (Cs3Bi2Br9), and an oxybromide (Bi24O31Br10(OH)δ) have been exploited in photocatalytic transformations. Catalysed types of reactions include the degradation of organic dyes such as methyl orange, antibiotics such as tetracycline, and biocides such as triclosan, as well as CH activation of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, transfer (de)hydrogenation of alcohols/ketones, and olefin polymerisation. These applications of bismuth compounds in heterogeneous catalysis suggest that photochemical strategies might also be applicable for well‐defined, molecular bismuth compounds under homogeneous conditions. Indeed, the light‐sensitivity of molecular bismuth complexes such as organobismuthanes, dibismuthanes, bismuth amides, and related species has been phenomenologically reported in some cases. The direct involvement of bismuth functional groups in visible light absorption has been demonstrated through TD‐DFT calculations and UV/Vis spectroscopy for the bismuth radical [Bi(NONDipp)]., a dibismuthane, and a cationic bismuth carbamoyl ([RBi‐C(O)NR′2]+).[ , , , ] However, applications of well‐defined molecular bismuth compounds in photochemically‐initiated, catalysed radical reactions have not been reported to date.

Scheme 1

Well‐defined, molecular bismuth compounds for catalysed radical reactions: species applied in thermally‐ vs. photochemically‐induced transformations.

We show here that an easily accessible, storable, molecular organo(bismuth)thiolate is catalytically active in photochemically‐induced radical dehydrocoupling reactions.

We recently reported preliminary results on the synthesis of the diorgano(bismuth)thiolate 2‐SPh from transition metal bismuthane 1‐Mn(CO) and diphenyldisulfide, (SPh)2 (Scheme 2, Route A). Here, we extend this approach to the heavier homologues 2‐SePh and 2‐TePh, which could be obtained in high yields (>90 %, Supporting Information). In addition, compounds 2‐EPh were also synthesised in a straightforward, transition‐metal‐free salt elimination protocol via Route B and fully characterised (Scheme 2, Supporting Information, E=S, Se, Te). Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis of 2‐SePh and 2‐TePh confirmed Bi1−Se1 and Bi1−Te1 bond length in the expected ranges and bonding interactions between Bi1 and the sulfur atom of the ligand backbone, S1, as recently reported for the sulfur analogue 2‐SPh.[ , ] According to NBO analyses, these Bi1⋅⋅⋅S1 interactions are realised through n(S1)→σ*(Bi‐EPh) bonding with the corresponding deletion energies ranging from 18.2 to 21.3 kcal mol−1 (Supporting Information). In order to evaluate the potential of compounds 2‐EPh to be applied in photochemical reactions, they were analysed by UV/Vis spectroscopy and (TD)‐DFT calculations. The results are qualitatively identical and discussed here for 2‐SPh (for details see Supporting Information). The experimental UV/Vis spectrum of 2‐SPh in THF shows two absorption features centred around 307 and 264 nm with an onset at ca. 380 nm (Figure 1). These absorption bands were correlated with five singlet–singlet transitions T1–T5, three of which show larger oscillator strengths (T1 (315 nm), T2 (296 nm), T4 (266 nm)). T1, T2, and T4 correspond to a HOMO/LUMO (T1, 88 %), HOMO/LUMO+1 (T2, 78 %), and HOMO−1/LUMO (T4, 59 %) transition, respectively (Figure 1 and Supporting Information). While the HOMO and the HOMO−1 show contributions to Bi−SPh σ‐bonding, the LUMO and LUMO+1 show contributions to Bi−SPh σ*‐antibonding interactions. These analyses suggest that compounds 2‐EPh should be susceptible to photochemical Bi‐EPh bond cleavage, rendering them candidates for photocatalytic applications.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of compounds 2‐EPh via routes A and B and molecular structures of 2‐SePh and 2‐TePh in the solid state. Cp=C5H5. Displacement parameters are drawn at the 50 % probability level. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): 2‐SePh: Bi1−C1, 2.284(11); Bi1−C14, 2.303(10); Bi1−Se1, 2.7285(11); Bi1−S1, 2.966(3); C1‐Bi1‐C14, 97.9(3); C1‐Bi1‐Se1, 90.0(3); S1‐Bi1‐Se1, 157.23(6). 2‐TePh: Bi1−C1, 2.288(3); Bi1−C14, 2.289(3); Bi1−Te1, 2.9296(3); Bi1−S1, 3.0007(7); C1‐Bi1‐C14, 96.98(9); C1‐Bi1‐Te1, 93.92(7); S1‐Bi1‐Te1, 161.818(14).

Figure 1

Experimental UV/Vis spectrum of 2‐SPh in THF (solid black line), five lowest energy calculated transitions (blue bars), and molecular orbitals involved in the two calculated absorptions with highest intensity (A1 and A4). Isovalue=0.03.

We thus turned our attention towards the dehydrocoupling of phenylsilane (S1) with TEMPO to give siloxides P1 and P1′ (see reaction scheme in Table 1). This reaction has recently been investigated as a model reaction for thermally‐initiated radical catalysis with main group compounds in pivotal studies by the groups of Hill and Coles. In benzene solution at 23 °C with a reaction time of 1 d, 10 mol % of compounds 2‐EPh proved to be not catalytically active (entries 1–3). At an elevated temperature of 80 °C, small amounts of the coupling product P1 were detected, but the product formations are in agreement with stoichiometric regimes (entries 4–6). Following our UV/Vis spectroscopic and (TD‐)DFT analyses of compounds 2‐EPh, these bismuth chalcogenides were also tested as dehydrocoupling catalysts under photochemical conditions. Indeed, 2‐EPh proved to be catalytically active under irradiation with a mercury vapour lamp (entries 7–10). While the background reaction and the tellurium compound 2‐TePh only led to low yields of the desired coupling products, good (65 %) and excellent conversions (93 %) could be obtained with the homologous selenium (2‐SePh) and sulfur species (2‐SPh). This trend was ascribed to the photosensitivity of 2‐EPh, which increases with increasing atomic numbers of E, and to the higher reactivity of selenium and tellurium containing by‐products (with the potential to undergo unselective side reactions). The by‐product dihydrogen, H2, was detected by 1H NMR spectroscopy. With 2‐SPh as a catalyst and two equivalents of TEMPO, 94 % conversion was obtained in 1 d reaction time, necessarily with a clear preference for the double substitution product P1′ (entry 11). 2‐SPh is also active as a catalyst for dehydrocoupling of the less reactive substrate Ph2SiH2 (S3): with one equivalent of TEMPO, 63 % yield of P3 were obtained under standard photochemical conditions (entry 12). Near‐quantitative conversion of S3 to P3 in 1 d was obtained by using n=2 equivalents of TEMPO (entry 13). These results demonstrate for the first time the high potential of well‐defined molecular bismuth compounds for the exploitation in photochemically‐induced catalytic bond forming events via radical pathways. In terms of catalytic activity, the bismuth thiolate 2‐SPh clearly outperforms the bismuth radical compound [Bi(NONDipp)]., which was recently reported to catalyse the reaction of S1 with TEMPO in a thermally‐induced transformation (e.g.: 10 mol % [Bi(NONDipp)]., 70 °C, 1.7 d reaction time, 10 % conversion (formation of P1); (cf. entries 8, 11). Furthermore, the catalytic activity of 2‐SPh can compete with that of the magnesium amide Mg{N(SiMe3)2}2(thf)2, which has been shown to catalyse thermally‐initiated dehydrocoupling reactions of S1 and S3 with TEMPO: while Mg{N(SiMe3)2}2(thf)2 is catalytically more selective in addressing only one Si−H bond of PhSiH3, that is, reaction of S1 with 1 equiv TEMPO (10 mol % cat., 60 °C 1 d, 99 % yield of P1; cf. entry 8), 2‐SPh is catalytically more active in addressing Si−H bonds of secondary silanes, that is, in the overall reaction of S1 or S3 with two equiv TEMPO (S1: 10 mol % Mg{N(SiMe3)2}2(thf)2, 80 °C, 6 d, 96 % yield, S3: 10 mol % Mg{N(SiMe3)2}2(thf)2, 80 °C, 4 d, 99 % yield; cf. entries 11, 13). Concerning the mode of initiation of the reaction (thermally vs. photochemically), our approach is complementary to those previously reported for the dehydrocoupling of TEMPO with silanes.[ , ]

Table 1

Bismuth species in the catalysed dehydrocoupling reaction of TEMPO with PhSiH3 (S1) or Ph2SiH2 (S2).

#	Cat.	Silane (R or R2)	n	Cond.	Conversion [%][a]
1	2‐SPh	S1 (Ph)	1	23 °C	<1 (P1)
2	2‐SePh	S1 (Ph)	1	23 °C	<1 (P1)
3	2‐TePh	S1 (Ph)	1	23 °C	<1 (P1)
4	2‐SPh	S1 (Ph)	1	80 °C	3 (P1)
5	2‐SePh	S1 (Ph)	1	80 °C	9 (P1)
6	2‐TePh	S1 (Ph)	1	80 °C	9 (P1)
7	None	S1 (Ph)	1	hν	10 (P1)
8	2‐SPh	S1 (Ph)	1	hν	93 (53 % P1, 20 % P1′)
9	2‐SePh	S1 (Ph)	1	hν	65 (39 % P1, 13 % P1′)
10	2‐TePh	S1 (Ph)	1	hν	13 (P1)
11	2‐SPh	S1 (Ph)	2	hν	94 (13 % P1, 87 % P1′)
12	2‐SPh	S3 (Ph2)	1	hν	63 (P3)
13	2‐SPh	S3 (Ph2)	2	hν	97 (P3)[b]
14	2‐SPh	S2 (nHex)	2	hν	64 (69 % P2, 29 % P2′)
15	2‐SPh	S4 (Ph/Me)	2	hν	54 (P4)[b]
16	2‐SPh	S5 (tBu2)	2	hν	0 (P5)
17	4	S1 (Ph)	1	23 °C	4 (P1)
18	4	S1 (Ph)	1	hν	>99 (52 % P1, 24 % P1′)[c]
19	5	S1 (Ph)	1	23 °C	<1 (P1)
20	5	S1 (Ph)	1	hν	48 (P1)

[a] Conversion of TEMPO, determined by 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis of silanes S1 and P1–P4 (also see Supporting Information). [b] Conversion of S3 and S4 to P3 and P4. [c] The TEMPO that is part of 4 is also fully converted (Supporting Information).

#

Preliminary investigations into the substrate scope of this reaction show reduced catalytic activities for silanes bearing one or more alkyl substituents (entries 14–16 and Supporting Information).

In order to identify potential intermediates of the catalysed reactions, a reaction mixture obtained under our standard catalytic conditions (e.g. entry 8) was analysed by high‐resolution mass spectrometry. Signals of m/z=578.1922 and 843.1000 were detected (Supporting Information). This corresponds to species with the sum formulae [C23H31BiNOS]+ (calc. m/z=578.1925) and [C28H25Bi2S2]+ (calc. m/z=843.1000), which were assigned to protonated derivatives of the bismuth tempoxide [Bi(C6H4CH2)2S(OTEMP)] (4) and the dibismuthane [Bi(C6H4CH2)2S]2 (5), respectively. Both compounds were synthesised in independent approaches, isolated, and fully characterised (Scheme 3). Compound 4 was obtained as a colourless solid from the reaction of 3 with in situ‐generated Na(OTEMP). Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis revealed X−O1 bond lengths (Bi1−O1, 2.18 Å; N1−O1, 1.46 Å) and an angle sum around N1 (333.9°), which point towards this complex being best described as a bismuth tempoxide species (Scheme 3 b).[ , , , ] This is also in agreement with the presence of a Bi1⋅⋅⋅S1 bonding interaction, which is expected for a sufficiently electronegative anionic substituent X− bound to [Bi(C6H4CH2)2S]+.[ , ] EPR spectroscopic investigations revealed a very weak resonance indicating the presence of trace amounts (0.3 %) of TEMPO in solution. Since the NMR spectroscopic and elemental analysis of 4 gave no hints at the presence of impurities, the postulation of an equilibrium scenario [Bi(C6H4CH2)2S(OTEMP)]⇌[Bi(C6H4CH2)2S].+TEMPO., appeared tempting.[ , ] However, powder EPR spectra of 4 and the temperature‐dependence of the EPR signals of 4 in solution clearly ruled out an equilibrium scenario in the range of −60 to +20 °C, indicating that it is in fact due to trace impurities of TEMPO in the sample, which could not be removed by repeated re‐crystallisations (Figure S12, Supporting Information).

Scheme 3

a) Synthesis of compounds 4 and 5; i: Na(OTEMP), r.t. THF, 2 h; ii: PhSiH3, 60 °C, benzene, 4 d. b, c) Molecular structures of 4 and 5 in the solid state. Displacement parameters are drawn at the 50 % probability level. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): 4: Bi1−C1, 2.274(8); Bi1−C14, 2.271(9); Bi1−O1, 2.184(5); Bi1−S1, 2.936(2); N1−O1, 1.459(8); C1‐Bi1‐C14, 91.5(3); C1‐Bi1‐O1, 92.3(3); Bi1‐O1‐N1, 106.1(4); S1‐Bi1‐O1, 159.76(15); ∑C/O‐N1‐C/O, 333.9(6). 5: Bi1−C1, 2.262(7); Bi1−C14, 2.289(7); Bi1−Bi1‘, 3.0211(5); C1‐Bi1‐C14, 104.8(3); C1‐Bi1‐Bi1‘, 91.59(18); C1‐Bi1‐Bi1‘‐C1‘, 180.

Compound 5 was obtained as a red solid from the reaction of 4 with PhSiH3. NMR spectroscopic reaction monitoring revealed the formation of PhSiH2(OTEMP) and H2, suggesting a mechanism via the short‐lived bismuthane [HBi(C6H4CH2)2S].[ , ] Once compound 5 is precipitated, its solubility in common organic solvents is very poor. NMR spectroscopic data could only be obtained at elevated temperature in pyridine (Supporting Information). Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis confirmed the expected molecular structure with C symmetry and a non‐polar Bi−Bi bond (3.02 Å), resulting in the absence of Bi1⋅⋅⋅S1 interactions (Scheme 3 c).

Combined UV/Vis spectroscopic and (TD‐)DFT analyses of 4 and 5 suggest that they should be susceptible to photochemically‐induced Bi−O/Bi−Bi bond cleavage (Supporting Information). In agreement with these results, isolated compounds 4 and 5 proved to be catalytically competent in the photochemically‐induced dehydrocoupling of S1 with TEMPO (Table 1, entries 17–20). While quantitative yields were obtained with 4, the lower yield of 48 % obtained with 5 was ascribed to the poor solubility of the isolated species. The mechanism of the catalysed reactions presented in this work is certainly complex and potentially involves resting states and parallel reaction pathways. In order to rationalise the catalytic reaction, a tentatively suggested catalytic cycle involving all compounds that were isolated or detected in catalytic experiments is shown in Scheme 4 (for further details, see Supporting Information).

Scheme 4

Tentatively suggested catalytic cycle for dehydrocoupling of S1 with TEMPO to give P1, catalysed by 2‐SPh (for further details see Supporting Information). [Bi]=[Bi(C6H4CH2)2S].

In summary, we have demonstrated that the easily accessible and storable diorgano(bismuth)thiolate [Bi(C6H4CH2)2S(SPh)] (2‐SPh) allows for the first application of a well‐defined molecular bismuth compound as a catalyst in a homogeneous photochemical approach. In the radical dehydrocoupling of silanes with TEMPO, 2‐SPh shows a much higher catalytic activity than previously reported bismuth compounds and is competitive with a previously reported magnesium species. The new approach is complementary to existing ones in terms of reaction initiation (thermal vs. photochemical), opening up perspectives for orthogonal synthetic strategies. TD‐DFT calculations gave insights into the initiating step of the reaction and catalytically competent intermediates have been isolated and characterised.

Experimental Section

Crystallographic data: Deposition numbers 1990330, 1990331, 1990332, and 1990333 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supplementary

Click here for additional data file.