| Literature DB >> 31057745 |
Jacqueline Ramler1, Jordi Poater2,3, Florian Hirsch4, Benedikt Ritschel1, Ingo Fischer4, F Matthias Bickelhaupt5,6, Crispin Lichtenberg1.
Abstract
Major advances in the chemistry of 5th and 6th row heavy p-block element compounds have recently uncovered intriguing reactivity patterns towards small molecules such as H2, CO2, and ethylene. However, well-defined, homogeneous insertion reactions with carbon monoxide, one of the benchmark substrates in this field, have not been reported to date. We demonstrate here, that a cationic bismuth amide undergoes facile insertion of CO into the Bi-N bond under mild conditions. This approach grants direct access to the first cationic bismuth carbamoyl species. Its characterization by NMR, IR, and UV/vis spectroscopy, elemental analysis, single-crystal X-ray analysis, cyclic voltammetry, and DFT calculations revealed intriguing properties, such as a reversible electron transfer at the bismuth center and an absorption feature at 353 nm ascribed to a transition involving σ- and π-type orbitals of the bismuth-carbamoyl functionality. A combined experimental and theoretical approach provided insight into the mechanism of CO insertion. The substrate scope could be extended to isonitriles.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31057745 PMCID: PMC6471928 DOI: 10.1039/c9sc00278b
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Scheme 1Examples of well-defined compounds of heavy p-block elements that show unusual reactivity patterns towards small molecules. Aryl = C6H3-2,6(C6H3-2,6-iPr2)2.
Scheme 2Insertion of CO into Bi–N bond of (masked) cationic bismuth amide 1 to give cationic bismuth carbamoyl compound 2; py = pyridine, Tf = SO2CF3.
Fig. 1Molecular structure of [Bi(CONPh(C6H4))(NC5H5)2][OTf] (2) in the solid state. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Bi1–C2, 2.227(5); Bi1–C13, 2.335(5); Bi1–N2, 2.520(4); Bi1–N3, 2.471(4); Bi1···O2, 3.164(4); C13–O1, 1.213(5); C13–N1, 1.382(6); C2–Bi1–C13, 76.60(16); C2–Bi1–N2, 84.21(15); C2–Bi1···O2, 103.25(14); N2–Bi1–N3, 163.56(13); C13–Bi1···O2, 153.50(14); τ5 = 0.17.
Fig. 2(a) Cyclic voltammogram of 2 in THF/0.1 M [N(nBu)4][PF6] at 23 °C with a scan rate of 500 mV s–1; Fc = Fe(C5H5)2. (b) Optimized geometry and spin density distribution (iso value = 0.001) of reduced species [Bi(CONPh(C6H4))]˙ (2red).
Fig. 3UV/vis spectrum of 2 (0.4 mM solution in THF) and orbitals involved in the transition at 353 nm according to TD-DFT calculations on [Bi(CONPh(C6H4))(thf)2]+.
Scheme 4Insertion of CNR into Bi–N bond of (masked) cationic bismuth amide 1 to give cationic bismuth amidinoyl compounds 3, 4, and 5; py = pyridine, Tf = SO2CF3.
Fig. 4Molecular structures of [Bi(CNRNPh(C6H4))(NC5H5)2][OTf] in the solid state ((a) 3 (R = Me); (b) 4 (R = tBu); (c) 5 (R = 2,6-Me2-C6H3)). Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level; carbon atoms of pyridine ligands are shown as wireframe for clarity. Hydrogen atoms, lattice-bound solvent molecules, and split positions of disordered groups in (c) are omitted for clarity. Atom labelling in (b) and (c) is in analogy with that in (a). Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): (a) Bi1–C2, 2.222(3); Bi1–C13, 2.305(3); Bi1–N3, 2.499(2); Bi1–N4, 2.482(2); Bi1···O1, 3.025(2); C13–N1, 1.402(3); C13–N2, 1.263(3); C2–Bi1–C13, 76.84(10); C2–Bi1–N3, 84.48(8); C2–Bi1···O1, 79.86(9); N3–Bi1–N4, 164.35(7); C13–Bi1···O1, 155.56(8); τ5 = 0.15. (b) Bi1–C2, 2.225(3); Bi1–C13, 2.331(3); Bi1–N3, 2.485(3); Bi1–N4, 2.525(3); Bi1···O1, 2.997(2); C13–N1, 1.415(4); C13–N2, 1.261(4); C2–Bi1–C13, 77.35(12); C2–Bi1–N3, 87.63(11); C2–Bi1···O1, 80.94(10); N3–Bi1–N4, 169.39(9); C13–Bi1···O1, 153.18(9); τ5 = 0.27. (c) Bi1–C2, 2.202(4); Bi1–C13, 2.299(4); Bi1–N3, 2.510(4); Bi1–N4, 2.488(4); Bi1···O1, 2.907(15); C13–N1, 1.43(2); C13–N2, 1.269(6); C2–Bi1–C13, 76.89(15); C2–Bi1–N3, 84.96(14); C2–Bi1···O1, 82.0(3); N3–Bi1–N4, 169.41(13); C13–Bi1···O1, 158.8(3); τ5 = 0.18.