| Literature DB >> 32572648 |
Muhammad Farooq Khan1, Shania Rehman1, Malik Abdul Rehman2, Muhammad Abdul Basit3, Deok-Kee Kim1, Faisal Ahmed4,5, H M Waseem Khalil6, Imtisal Akhtar7, Seong Chan Jun8.
Abstract
Two-dimensional (2D) layered materials have an atomically thin and flat nature which makes it an ultimate candidate for spintronic devices. The spin-valve junctions (SVJs), composed of 2D materials, have been recognized as unique features of spin transport polarization. However, the magnetotransport properties of SVJs are highly influenced by the type of intervening layer (spacer) inserted between the ferromagnetic materials (FMs). In this situation, the spin filtering effect at the interfaces plays a critical role in the observation of the magnetoresistance (MR) of such magnetic structures, which can be improved by using promising hybrid structure. Here, we report MR of bilayer graphene (BLG), single-layer MoSe2 (SL-MoSe2), and BLG/SL-MoSe2 heterostack SVJs. However, before annealing, BLG and SL-MoSe2 SVJs demonstrate positive MR, but after annealing, BLG reverses its polarity while the SL-MoSe2 maintains its polarity and demonstrated stable positive spin polarizations at both interfaces due to meager doping effect of ferromagnetic (FM) contacts. Further, Co/BLG/SL-MoSe2/NiFe determines positive MR, i.e., ~ 1.71% and ~ 1.86% at T = 4 K before and after annealing, respectively. On the contrary, NiFe/BLG/SL-MoSe2/Co SVJs showed positive MR before annealing and subsequently reversed its MR sign after annealing due to the proximity-induced effect of metals doping with graphene. The obtained results can be useful to comprehend the origin of polarity and the selection of non-magnetic material (spacer) for magnetotransport properties. Thus, this study established a new paragon for novel spintronic applications.Entities:
Keywords: Graphene; Heterostack; Magnetoresistance; Metals doping; MoSe2; Spin-valve junction
Year: 2020 PMID: 32572648 PMCID: PMC7310050 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-020-03365-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1a Scheme of device fabrication where ferromagnetic Co and NiFe metals were deposited on the top and bottom, respectively. b The change in R vs B traces before annealing at different temperatures (with I = 10 μA). (Inset) Current-voltage characteristics of the BLG at different temperatures are linear and indicate an ohmic contact. c Temperature-dependent MR values of the BLG before and after annealing at fixed ac current. (Inset) The MR vs B of Co/BLG/NiFe junction after annealing at T = 4 K. d Schematic drawing of spin-dependent density of states for BLG. Band splitting gives a difference in spin-up and spin-down carriers at EF. The thick dashed red line in the middle shows decoupling of van der Waals-bonded BLG
Fig. 2a Optical image of SL-MoSe2 flake on top of the hole. b Junction resistance of SL-MoSe2 at different temperatures. (Inset) Temperature-dependent I-V curves of vertical Co/SL-MoSe2/NiFe SVJ demonstrates a metallic junction. c The variation of R vs B at T = 300, 200, 100, 50, and 4 K before annealing. d The temperature-dependent MR ratio of Co/SL-MoSe2/NiFe before and after annealing at fixed current. (Inset) The schematic illustration of the device with SL-MoSe2
Fig. 3a Optical microscopic image of BLG/SL-MoSe2 on a hole. b The temperature-dependent MR loops of Co/BLG/SL-MoSe2/NiFe junction at fixed current (I = 10 μΑ). (Top-inset) The temperature-dependent junction resistance of Co/BLG/SL-MoSe2/NiFe. (Bottom-inset) The linear I-V curve of Co/BLG/SL-MoSe2/NiFe device at T = 4 K. c Schematic drawing of spin-dependent density of states for BLG and SL-MoSe2 heterostacks. After annealing the devices, the Fermi levels of BLG adjacent to the Co or NiFe are shifted due to n-type or p-type doping. d Before and after annealing, the MR magnitudes as a function of temperature for the structure of Co/BLG/SL-MoSe2/NiFe. (Inset) After annealing, the temperature-dependent MR loop of the Co/BLG/SL-MoSe2/NiFe junction at a fixed current, I = 10 μΑ
Fig. 4a Before annealing, the MR traces as a function of the magnetic field at T = 300, 4 K and I = 10 μA. b After annealing, the MR traces vs magnetic field, B, at different temperatures. c Before and after annealing, the MR values at T = 300, 200, 100, 50, and 4 K. d The MR magnitudes of NiFe/BLG/SL-MoSe2/Co at different current values