Literature DB >> 32567035

Using Eye-Tracking Technology with Older People in Memory Clinics to Investigate the Impact of Mild Cognitive Impairment on Choices for EQ-5D-5L Health States Preferences.

Kaiying Wang1, Chris Barr2, Richard Norman3, Stacey George2, Craig Whitehead4, Julie Ratcliffe2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Population ageing is a phenomenon taking place in almost every global region. Current estimates indicate that 10-20% of older people in developed countries have mild cognitive impairment (MCI), with these percentages predicted to rise markedly by 2050.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to apply eye-tracking technology to investigate the information processes adopted by older people with and without MCI in determining preferences for health states in the five-level EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) instrument.
METHODS: Older people (aged ≥ 65 years; including both patients and family carers) attending outpatient memory clinics in Southern Adelaide between July 2017 and June 2018, competent to read and converse in English and with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) cognition score of ≥ 19 were invited to participate. In total, 52 people met the inclusion criteria, of whom 20 (38%) provided informed consent and fully participated. Participants were categorised into two subgroups (each n = 10) for comparison based upon established MMSE cognition thresholds (19-23, lower MMSE indicative of MCI; ≥ 24, higher MMSE indicative of good cognition). A discrete-choice experiment (DCE) comprising a series of pairwise choices between alternative EQ-5D-5L health states of varying survival duration with differential levels of task complexity (approximated by the degree of attribute level overlap in each choice), was administered as a face-to-face interview with the participant wearing an eye-tracking device.
RESULTS: Attribute non-attendance (ANA) was higher for the lower MMSE subgroup than for the higher MMSE subgroup, although these differences were generally not statistically significant. ANA remained relatively low and consistent for participants with good cognition regardless of task complexity. In contrast, ANA increased notably in participants exhibiting MCI, increasing from 10% on average per participant in the lower MMSE subgroup with five attribute level overlap to 23% on average per participant in the lower MMSE subgroup with zero attribute level overlap.
CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study provided important insights into the information processes adopted by older people with varying levels of cognitive functioning when choosing between alternative EQ-5D-5L health states of varying survival duration and specifically the relationships between cognitive capacity, task complexity and the extent of ANA. Recent advances in econometric modelling of health state valuation data have demonstrated the added value of capturing ANA information as this can be accounted for in the DCE data analysis, thereby improving the precision of model estimates. Eye-tracking technology can usefully inform the design, conduct and econometric modelling of DCEs, driving the inclusion of this rapidly growing population traditionally excluded from preference-elicitation studies of this nature.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 32567035     DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00588-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy        ISSN: 1175-5652            Impact factor:   2.561


  21 in total

1.  Decision making heuristics and the elicitation of preferences: being fast and frugal about the future.

Authors:  John Cairns; Marjon van der Pol; Andrew Lloyd
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  What Characteristics of Nursing Homes Are Most Valued by Consumers? A Discrete Choice Experiment with Residents and Family Members.

Authors:  Rachel Milte; Julie Ratcliffe; Gang Chen; Maria Crotty
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 5.725

3.  Cognitive overload? An exploration of the potential impact of cognitive functioning in discrete choice experiments with older people in health care.

Authors:  Rachel Milte; Julie Ratcliffe; Gang Chen; Emily Lancsar; Michelle Miller; Maria Crotty
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  Accounting for Attribute-Level Non-Attendance in a Health Choice Experiment: Does it Matter?

Authors:  Seda Erdem; Danny Campbell; Arne Risa Hole
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  Normal cognitive aging.

Authors:  Caroline N Harada; Marissa C Natelson Love; Kristen L Triebel
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.076

7.  Timing of onset of cognitive decline: results from Whitehall II prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Archana Singh-Manoux; Mika Kivimaki; M Maria Glymour; Alexis Elbaz; Claudine Berr; Klaus P Ebmeier; Jane E Ferrie; Aline Dugravot
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-01-05

8.  Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Vikas Soekhai; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Alan R Ellis; Caroline M Vass
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Eye movement analysis and cognitive processing: detecting indicators of conversion to Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Marta Lg Freitas Pereira; Marina von Zuben A Camargo; Ivan Aprahamian; Orestes V Forlenza
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.570

10.  Exploring how individuals complete the choice tasks in a discrete choice experiment: an interview study.

Authors:  Jorien Veldwijk; Domino Determann; Mattijs S Lambooij; Janine A van Til; Ida J Korfage; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; G Ardine de Wit
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  1 in total

1.  Examining the Association between Polish Migrant Status and Health Preferences Using a Novel Application of a Smaller Design EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study.

Authors:  Dan Kelleher; Samer Kharroubi; Edel Doherty; Gianluca Baio; Ciaran O'Neill
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2022-01-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.