Literature DB >> 30005757

What Characteristics of Nursing Homes Are Most Valued by Consumers? A Discrete Choice Experiment with Residents and Family Members.

Rachel Milte1, Julie Ratcliffe2, Gang Chen3, Maria Crotty4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To generate a scoring algorithm weighted on the preferences of consumers for assessing the quality of care in nursing homes (i.e., aged care homes or institutions) in six key domains.
METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was undertaken with residents of nursing homes (n = 126) or family member proxies (n = 416) in cases where severe cognitive impairment precluded resident participation. Analysis was undertaken using conditional and mixed logit regression models to determine preferences for potential attributes.
RESULTS: The findings indicate that all six attributes investigated were statistically significant factors for participants. Feeling at home in the resident's own room was the most important characteristic to both residents and family members. Care staff being able to spend enough time with residents, feeling at home in shared spaces, and staff being very flexible in care routines were also characteristics identified as important for both groups. The results of the Swait-Louviere test rejected the null hypothesis that the estimated parameters between residents and family members were the same, indicating that data from these two groups could not be pooled to generate a single weighted scoring algorithm for the Consumer Choice Index-Six Dimension instrument. Preferences were therefore encapsulated to generate scoring algorithms specific to residents and family members.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important insights into the characteristics of nursing home care that are most valued by consumers. The Consumer Choice Index-Six Dimension instrument may be usefully applied in the evaluation, planning, and design of future services.
Copyright © 2018 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aged care; discrete choice experiment; nursing homes; outcome measure; person-centered care; preferences; value

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 30005757     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  6 in total

1.  Using Eye-Tracking Technology with Older People in Memory Clinics to Investigate the Impact of Mild Cognitive Impairment on Choices for EQ-5D-5L Health States Preferences.

Authors:  Kaiying Wang; Chris Barr; Richard Norman; Stacey George; Craig Whitehead; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.561

2.  Preferences for Primary Healthcare Services Among Older Adults with Chronic Disease: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Yingying Peng; Mingzhu Jiang; Xiao Shen; Xianglin Li; Erping Jia; Juyang Xiong
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Preferences heterogeneity of health care utilization of community residents in China: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Ming-Zhu Jiang; Qiang Fu; Ju-Yang Xiong; Xiang-Lin Li; Er-Ping Jia; Ying-Ying Peng; Xiao Shen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Treatment Preferences of Residents Assumed to Have Severe Chronic Diseases in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Yinghao Lv; Qiang Fu; Xiao Shen; Erping Jia; Xianglin Li; Yingying Peng; Jinghong Yan; Mingzhu Jiang; Juyang Xiong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The Frailty In Residential Sector over Time (FIRST) study: methods and baseline cohort description.

Authors:  Agathe Daria Jadczak; Leonie Robson; Tina Cooper; J Simon Bell; Renuka Visvanathan
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Clustered domestic model of residential care is associated with better consumer rated quality of care.

Authors:  Emmanuel S Gnanamanickam; Suzanne M Dyer; Rachel Milte; Enwu Liu; Julie Ratcliffe; Maria Crotty
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.038

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.