Literature DB >> 32561673

Ketamine Affects Prediction Errors about Statistical Regularities: A Computational Single-Trial Analysis of the Mismatch Negativity.

Lilian A Weber1, Andreea O Diaconescu2,3,4, Christoph Mathys2,5,6, André Schmidt3, Michael Kometer7, Franz Vollenweider7, Klaas E Stephan2,8,9.   

Abstract

The auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) is significantly reduced in schizophrenia. Notably, a similar MMN reduction can be achieved with NMDA receptor (NMDAR) antagonists. Both phenomena have been interpreted as reflecting an impairment of predictive coding or, more generally, the "Bayesian brain" notion that the brain continuously updates a hierarchical model to infer the causes of its sensory inputs. Specifically, neurobiological interpretations of predictive coding view perceptual inference as an NMDAR-dependent process of minimizing hierarchical precision-weighted prediction errors (PEs), and disturbances of this putative process play a key role in hierarchical Bayesian theories of schizophrenia. Here, we provide empirical evidence for this theory, demonstrating the existence of multiple, hierarchically related PEs in a "roving MMN" paradigm. We applied a hierarchical Bayesian model to single-trial EEG data from healthy human volunteers of either sex who received the NMDAR antagonist S-ketamine in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, within-subject fashion. Using an unrestricted analysis of the entire time-sensor space, our trial-by-trial analysis indicated that low-level PEs (about stimulus transitions) are expressed early (102-207 ms poststimulus), while high-level PEs (about transition probability) are reflected by later components (152-199 and 215-277 ms) of single-trial responses. Furthermore, we find that ketamine significantly diminished the expression of high-level PE responses, implying that NMDAR antagonism disrupts the inference on abstract statistical regularities. Our findings suggest that NMDAR dysfunction impairs hierarchical Bayesian inference about the world's statistical structure. Beyond the relevance of this finding for schizophrenia, our results illustrate the potential of computational single-trial analyses for assessing potential pathophysiological mechanisms.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HGF; NMDA receptor; hierarchical Gaussian filter; mismatch negativity; predictive coding; schizophrenia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32561673      PMCID: PMC7363468          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3069-19.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  71 in total

Review 1.  Mismatch negativity (MMN): perspectives for application.

Authors:  R Näätänen
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Hierarchical prediction errors in midbrain and basal forebrain during sensory learning.

Authors:  Sandra Iglesias; Christoph Mathys; Kay H Brodersen; Lars Kasper; Marco Piccirelli; Hanneke E M den Ouden; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Estimating changing contexts in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Claire M Kaplan; Debjani Saha; Juan L Molina; William D Hockeimer; Elizabeth M Postell; Jose A Apud; Daniel R Weinberger; Hao Yang Tan
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  The Helmholtz machine.

Authors:  P Dayan; G E Hinton; R M Neal; R S Zemel
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  The effects of a sub-anaesthetic dose of ketamine on human selective attention.

Authors:  B Oranje; B N van Berckel; C Kemner; J M van Ree; R S Kahn; M N Verbaten
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Cholinergic stimulation enhances Bayesian belief updating in the deployment of spatial attention.

Authors:  Simone Vossel; Markus Bauer; Christoph Mathys; Rick A Adams; Raymond J Dolan; Klaas E Stephan; Karl J Friston
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Catecholaminergic Regulation of Learning Rate in a Dynamic Environment.

Authors:  Marieke Jepma; Peter R Murphy; Matthew R Nassar; Mauricio Rangel-Gomez; Martijn Meeter; Sander Nieuwenhuis
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Task relevance modulates the behavioural and neural effects of sensory predictions.

Authors:  Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Karl J Friston; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Implicit learning of predictable sound sequences modulates human brain responses at different levels of the auditory hierarchy.

Authors:  Françoise Lecaignard; Olivier Bertrand; Gérard Gimenez; Jérémie Mattout; Anne Caclin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of Early Ketamine Effects on Belief-Updating Biases in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression.

Authors:  Hugo Bottemanne; Orphee Morlaas; Anne Claret; Tali Sharot; Philippe Fossati; Liane Schmidt
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 25.911

2.  Neurocomputational Underpinnings of Expected Surprise.

Authors:  Françoise Lecaignard; Olivier Bertrand; Anne Caclin; Jérémie Mattout
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Auditory mismatch responses are differentially sensitive to changes in muscarinic acetylcholine versus dopamine receptor function.

Authors:  Lilian Aline Weber; Sara Tomiello; Dario Schöbi; Katharina V Wellstein; Daniel Mueller; Sandra Iglesias; Klaas Enno Stephan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  Statistical Learning and Inference Is Impaired in the Nonclinical Continuum of Psychosis.

Authors:  Ilvana Dzafic; Roshini Randeniya; Clare D Harris; Moritz Bammel; Marta I Garrido
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Stronger Top-Down and Weaker Bottom-Up Frontotemporal Connections During Sensory Learning Are Associated With Severity of Psychotic Phenomena.

Authors:  Ilvana Dzafic; Kit M Larsen; Hayley Darke; Holly Pertile; Olivia Carter; Suresh Sundram; Marta I Garrido
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Dynamics of Oddball Sound Processing: Trial-by-Trial Modeling of ECoG Signals.

Authors:  Françoise Lecaignard; Raphaëlle Bertrand; Peter Brunner; Anne Caclin; Gerwin Schalk; Jérémie Mattout
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Classic Psychedelic Drugs: Update on Biological Mechanisms.

Authors:  Franz X Vollenweider; John W Smallridge
Journal:  Pharmacopsychiatry       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.544

Review 8.  The promise of layer-specific neuroimaging for testing predictive coding theories of psychosis.

Authors:  J Haarsma; P Kok; M Browning
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.662

Review 9.  TAPAS: An Open-Source Software Package for Translational Neuromodeling and Computational Psychiatry.

Authors:  Stefan Frässle; Eduardo A Aponte; Saskia Bollmann; Kay H Brodersen; Cao T Do; Olivia K Harrison; Samuel J Harrison; Jakob Heinzle; Sandra Iglesias; Lars Kasper; Ekaterina I Lomakina; Christoph Mathys; Matthias Müller-Schrader; Inês Pereira; Frederike H Petzschner; Sudhir Raman; Dario Schöbi; Birte Toussaint; Lilian A Weber; Yu Yao; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Glutamatergic modulation of auditory cortex connectivity with attentional brain networks in unpredictable perceptual environment.

Authors:  Kristiina Kompus; Vegard Volehaugen; Alex Craven; Karsten Specht
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.