Literature DB >> 32690617

Statistical Learning and Inference Is Impaired in the Nonclinical Continuum of Psychosis.

Ilvana Dzafic1,2,3,4, Roshini Randeniya2, Clare D Harris2, Moritz Bammel5, Marta I Garrido6,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Our perceptions result from the brain's ability to make inferences, or predictive models, of sensory information. Recently, it has been proposed that psychotic traits may be linked to impaired predictive processes. Here, we examine the brain dynamics underlying statistical learning and inference in stable and volatile environments, in a population of healthy human individuals (N = 75; 36 males, 39 females) with a range of psychotic-like experiences. We measured prediction error responses to sound sequences with electroencephalography, gauged sensory inference explicitly by behaviorally recording sensory statistical learning errors, and used dynamic causal modeling to tap into the underlying neural circuitry. We discuss the findings that were robust to replication across the two experiments (Discovery dataset, N = 31; Validation dataset, N = 44). First, we found that during stable conditions, participants demonstrated greater precision in their predictive model, reflected in a larger prediction error response to unexpected sounds, and decreased statistical learning errors. Moreover, individuals with attenuated prediction errors in stable conditions were found to make greater incorrect predictions about sensory information. Critically, we show that greater errors in statistical learning and inference are related to increased psychotic-like experiences. These findings link neurophysiology to behavior during statistical learning and prediction formation, as well as providing further evidence for the idea of a continuum of psychosis in the healthy, nonclinical population.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT While perceiving the world, we make inferences by learning the statistics present in the sensory environment. It has been argued that psychosis may emerge because of a failure to learn sensory statistics, resulting in an impaired representation of the world. Recently, it has been proposed that psychosis exists on a continuum; however, there is conflicting evidence on whether sensory learning deficits align on the nonclinical end of the psychosis continuum. We found that statistical learning of sensory events is associated with the magnitude of mismatch negativity and, critically, is impaired in healthy people who report more psychotic-like experiences. We replicated these findings in an independent sample, demonstrating strengthened credibility to support the continuum of psychosis that extends into the nonclinical population.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  inference; prediction error; psychosis continuum; statistical learning; volatility

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32690617      PMCID: PMC7455217          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0315-20.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  46 in total

1.  The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements.

Authors:  R Oostenveld; P Praamstra
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects.

Authors:  R P Rao; D H Ballard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem.

Authors:  Karl Friston; Lee Harrison; Jean Daunizeau; Stefan Kiebel; Christophe Phillips; Nelson Trujillo-Barreto; Richard Henson; Guillaume Flandin; Jérémie Mattout
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Temporal regularity facilitates higher-order sensory predictions in fast auditory sequences.

Authors:  Alessandro Tavano; Andreas Widmann; Alexandra Bendixen; Nelson Trujillo-Barreto; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  The prodromal questionnaire (PQ): preliminary validation of a self-report screening measure for prodromal and psychotic syndromes.

Authors:  Rachel L Loewy; Carrie E Bearden; Jennifer K Johnson; Adrian Raine; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Auditory prediction errors and auditory white matter microstructure associated with psychotic-like experiences in healthy individuals.

Authors:  L K L Oestreich; R Randeniya; M I Garrido
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.270

7.  Dynamic causal modeling of the response to frequency deviants.

Authors:  Marta I Garrido; James M Kilner; Stefan J Kiebel; Karl J Friston
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The functional anatomy of the MMN: a DCM study of the roving paradigm.

Authors:  Marta I Garrido; Karl J Friston; Stefan J Kiebel; Klaas E Stephan; Torsten Baldeweg; James M Kilner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Electromagnetic source reconstruction for group studies.

Authors:  Vladimir Litvak; Karl Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Implicit learning of predictable sound sequences modulates human brain responses at different levels of the auditory hierarchy.

Authors:  Françoise Lecaignard; Olivier Bertrand; Gérard Gimenez; Jérémie Mattout; Anne Caclin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

1.  Auditory mismatch responses are differentially sensitive to changes in muscarinic acetylcholine versus dopamine receptor function.

Authors:  Lilian Aline Weber; Sara Tomiello; Dario Schöbi; Katharina V Wellstein; Daniel Mueller; Sandra Iglesias; Klaas Enno Stephan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Stronger Top-Down and Weaker Bottom-Up Frontotemporal Connections During Sensory Learning Are Associated With Severity of Psychotic Phenomena.

Authors:  Ilvana Dzafic; Kit M Larsen; Hayley Darke; Holly Pertile; Olivia Carter; Suresh Sundram; Marta I Garrido
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Unpredictability of the "when" influences prediction error processing of the "what" and "where".

Authors:  Vera Tsogli; Sebastian Jentschke; Stefan Koelsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.