Literature DB >> 34819342

Neurocomputational Underpinnings of Expected Surprise.

Françoise Lecaignard1,2, Olivier Bertrand3,2, Anne Caclin3,2, Jérémie Mattout3,2.   

Abstract

Predictive coding accounts of brain functions profoundly influence current approaches to perceptual synthesis. However, a fundamental paradox has emerged, that may be very relevant for understanding hallucinations, psychosis, or cognitive inflexibility: in some situations, surprise or prediction error-related responses can decrease when predicted, and yet, they can increase when we know they are predictable. This paradox is resolved by recognizing that brain responses reflect precision-weighted prediction error. This presses us to disambiguate the contributions of precision and prediction error in electrophysiology. To meet this challenge for the first time, we appeal to a methodology that couples an original experimental paradigm with fine dynamic modeling. We examined brain responses in healthy human participants (N = 20; 10 female) to unexpected and expected surprising sounds, assuming that the latter yield a smaller prediction error but much more amplified by a larger precision weight. Importantly, addressing this modulation requires the modeling of trial-by-trial variations of brain responses, that we reconstructed within a fronto-temporal network by combining EEG and MEG. Our results reveal an adaptive learning of surprise with larger integration of past (relevant) information in the context of expected surprises. Within the auditory hierarchy, this adaptation was found tied down to specific connections and reveals in particular precision encoding through neuronal excitability. Strikingly, these fine processes are automated as sound sequences were unattended. These findings directly speak to applications in psychiatry, where specifically impaired precision weighting has been suggested to be at the heart of several conditions such as schizophrenia and autism.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In perception as Bayesian inference and learning, context sensitivity expresses as the precision weighting of prediction errors. A subtle mechanism that is thought to lie at the heart of several psychiatric conditions. It is thus critical to identify its neurophysiological and computational underpinnings. We revisit the passive auditory oddball paradigm by manipulating sound predictability and use a twofold modeling approach to simultaneous EEG-MEG recordings: (1) trial-by-trial modeling of cortical responses reveals a context-sensitive perceptual learning process; (2) the dynamic causal modeling (DCM) of evoked responses uncovers the associated changes in synaptic efficacy. Predictability discloses a link between precision weighting and self-inhibition of superficial pyramidal (SP) cells, a result that paves the way to a fine description of healthy and pathologic perception.
Copyright © 2022 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian learning; EEG-MEG fusion; dynamic causal modeling; mismatch negativity; predictive coding; trial-by-trial modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34819342      PMCID: PMC8802931          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0601-21.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  62 in total

1.  Bridging prediction and attention in current research on perception and action.

Authors:  Erich Schröger; Sonja A Kotz; Iria SanMiguel
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  MEG source localization under multiple constraints: an extended Bayesian framework.

Authors:  Jérémie Mattout; Christophe Phillips; William D Penny; Michael D Rugg; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Evidence for neural encoding of Bayesian surprise in human somatosensation.

Authors:  Dirk Ostwald; Bernhard Spitzer; Matthias Guggenmos; Timo T Schmidt; Stefan J Kiebel; Felix Blankenburg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Bayesian Dysconnections.

Authors:  Karl J Friston
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  Ketamine Affects Prediction Errors about Statistical Regularities: A Computational Single-Trial Analysis of the Mismatch Negativity.

Authors:  Lilian A Weber; Andreea O Diaconescu; Christoph Mathys; André Schmidt; Michael Kometer; Franz Vollenweider; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The Helmholtz machine.

Authors:  P Dayan; G E Hinton; R M Neal; R S Zemel
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  ELAN: a software package for analysis and visualization of MEG, EEG, and LFP signals.

Authors:  Pierre-Emmanuel Aguera; Karim Jerbi; Anne Caclin; Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-20

8.  Attentional Enhancement of Auditory Mismatch Responses: a DCM/MEG Study.

Authors:  Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Karl Friston
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  Repetition suppression and its contextual determinants in predictive coding.

Authors:  Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Karl Friston
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Electromagnetic source reconstruction for group studies.

Authors:  Vladimir Litvak; Karl Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  4 in total

1.  Separating Uncertainty from Surprise in Auditory Processing with Neurocomputational Models: Implications for Music Perception.

Authors:  Vincent K M Cheung; Shu Sakamoto
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  The Bayesian brain and cooperative communication in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Lena Palaniyappan; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 6.186

3.  Dynamics of Oddball Sound Processing: Trial-by-Trial Modeling of ECoG Signals.

Authors:  Françoise Lecaignard; Raphaëlle Bertrand; Peter Brunner; Anne Caclin; Gerwin Schalk; Jérémie Mattout
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Enhanced mismatch negativity in harmonic compared with inharmonic sounds.

Authors:  David Ricardo Quiroga-Martinez; Krzysztof Basiński; Jonathan Nasielski; Barbara Tillmann; Elvira Brattico; Fanny Cholvy; Lesly Fornoni; Peter Vuust; Anne Caclin
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.698

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.