Literature DB >> 32561425

COVID-19 epidemic in Brazil: Where are we at?

Andréa de Paula Lobo1, Augusto César Cardoso-Dos-Santos2, Marli Souza Rocha2, Rejane Sobrino Pinheiro3, João Matheus Bremm2, Eduardo Marques Macário2, Wanderson Kleber de Oliveira2, Giovanny Vinícius Araújo de França2.   

Abstract

OBJETIVE: To analyze the trends of COVID-19 in Brazil in 2020 by Federal Units (FU).
METHOD: Ecological time-series based on cumulative confirmed cases of COVID-19 from March 11 to May 12. Joinpoint regression models were applied to identify points of inflection in COVID-19 trends, considering the days since the 50th confirmed case as time unit.
RESULTS: Brazil reached its 50th confirmed case of COVID-19 in 11 March 2020 and, 63 days after that, on May 12, 177,589 cases had been confirmed. The trends for all regions and FU are upward. In the last segment, from the 31st to the 63rd day, Brazil presented a daily percentage change (DPC) of 7.3% (95%CI= 7.2;7.5). For the country the average daily percentage change (ADPC) was 14.2% (95%CI: 13.8;14.5). The highest ADPC values were found in the North, Northeast and Southeast regions.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our results show that all FUs in Brazil present upward trends of COVID-19. In some FUs, the slowdown in DPC in the last segment must be considered with caution. Each FU is at a different stage of the pandemic and, therefore, non-pharmacological measures should be adopted accordingly.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brazil; COVID-19; Epidemiology; Joinpoint; Times series

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32561425      PMCID: PMC7297148          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.06.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1201-9712            Impact factor:   3.623


Introduction: Brazil was the first South American country to report a confirmed case of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), on February 26, 2020, in São Paulo state [1]. Since then, the country has presented a complex epidemiological scenario, with marked regional differences. Here, we aimed to analyze the trends of COVID-19 in Brazil in 2020 by Federal Units (FU). Methods: We carried out an ecological time-series study based on cumulative confirmed cases of COVID-19 from March 11 to May 12. We used official data available at the Brazilian Ministry of Health webpage (https://covid.saude.gov.br/). Joinpoint regression models were applied to identify points of inflection in COVID-19 trends, considering the days since the 50th confirmed case as time unit. The magnitude of change in the number of cumulative cases in each segment (period between two inflections) was estimated through the daily percentage change (DPC), with a 95% confidence interval (95%CI). The number of segments was chosen according to the best fit indicated by the algorithm. The average daily percentage change (ADPC) represents the percentage change for the whole period. The analyses were performed using the National Cancer Institute's Joinpoint software [2], assuming a 5% significance level. Results: On March 11, Brazil reached the 50th confirmed case of COVID-19 and, 63 days after that, on May 12, 177,589 cases had been confirmed (26,9% in São Paulo state). We observed upward trends for all regions and FUs (Table 1 ). In the last segment, from the 31st to the 63rd day, Brazil presented a DPC of 7.3% (95%CI = 7.2;7.5) (Table 2 ).
Table 1

Joinpoint analysis for accumulated cases of COVID-19 in Brazil by day, 2020

Federative UnitsSegment 1Segment 2Segment 3Segment 4Segment 5Segment 6ADPC % (95% CI)
AR-DDPC % (95% CI)AR-DDPC % (95% CI)AR-DDPC % (95% CI)AR-DDPC % (95% CI)AR-DDPC % (95% CI)AR-DDPC % (95% CI)
Brazil1-1236.4*(35.3;37.5)12-2415.6*(14.6;16.5)24-3112.0*(9.7;14.3)31-637.3*(7.2;7.5)...14.2*(13.8;14.5)
North1-331.7*(23.5;40.4)3-720.9*(17.1;24.9)7-1214.3*(12.0;16.6)12-1821.8*(20.1;23.6)18-4810.1*(10.0;10.2)48-515.8*(2.5;9.3)13.3*(12.7;13.8)
Amazonas1-526.7* (22.8;30.7)5-1013.6*(10.1;17.1)10-1525.8* (22.0;29.8)15-239.9*(8.4;11.3)23-265.2 (-4.6;16)26-499.1* (8.9;9.3)12.5*(11.6;13.4)
Roraima1-1115.4*(14.1;16.7)11-207.9*(6.3;9.6)20-3010.3*(8.8;11.7)30-343.9 (-0.6;8.6)............10.3*(9.4;11.2)
Amapá1-719.0*(17.1;21.0)7-155.6*(4.2;7.0)15-1913.1*(7.7;18.7)19-257.6*(5.2;9.9)25-2817.0* (6.2;29.0)28-355.6*(4.3;7.0)10.1*(8.8;11.3)
Pará1-527.2*(21.4;33.3)5-87.6 (-7.2;24.8)8-2117.1*(16.1;18.1)21-4010.4*(9.9;10.9)............14.0*(12.6;15.4)
Tocantins1-922.2*(20.2;24.4)9-1815.4*(13.7;17.1)........................18.6*(17.4;19.8)
Rondônia1-38.5*(1.4;16.1)3-821.0*(18.5;23.7)8-1313.5*(11.1;16.0)13-166.9(-0.1;14.4)16-2511.6*(10.8;12.4)25-294.7*(2.5;7.0)11.8*(10.7;12.9)
Acre1-109.0* (8.1;10.0)10-1611.5* (9.1;13.9)16-236.4* (4.6;8.1)23-2816.2* (12.7; 19.8)28-3412.7* (10.3; 15.2)34-376.0* (0.9;11.3)10.2* (9.3;11.1)
Northeast1-534.2*(31.2;37.3)5-2214.8*(14.5;15.1)22-3810.8*(10.5;11.2)38-558.0*(7.7;8.2)............12.7*(12.5;13.0)
Maranhão1-515.3*(11.2;19.5)5-832.2*(17.9;48.3)8-1413.5*(10.6;16.4)14-1919.7*(15.4;24.1)19-428.9*(8.6;9.1)......13.0*(11.8;14.2)
Piauí1-620.4*(18.4;22.5)6-2112.5*(12.1:12.9)21-278.8*(7.0;10.6)27-305.1*(1.2;9.1)............12.2*(11.6;12.9)
Ceará1-444.8* (34.0; 56.5)4-2013.6* (12.9;14.4)20-379.1*(8.4;9.7)37-547.8*(7.2;8.4)............11.8*(11.2;12.4)
Rio Grande do Norte1-48.0*(1.2;15.3)4-737.1*(20.4;56.0)7-133.3*(0.4-6.4)13-367.4*(7.0;7.7)36-454.6*(3.4;5.8)......8.1*(6.9;9.2)
Pernambuco1-710.1*(7.9;12.4)7-1625.8* (24.2;27.5)16-2215.8*(12.7;19.0)22-3510.1*(9.3;10.9)35-476.3*(5.6;7.1)......12.7*(12.1;13.4)
Paraíba1-618.1*(14.8;21.4)6-1410.3*(8.5;12.2)14-2413.0*(11.7;14.3)24-3410.7*(9.6;11.8)............12.4*(11.6;13.2)
Sergipe1-1112.7*(11.1;14.3)11-1431.7*(9.9;57.8)14-2315.1*(12.8;17.4)23-267.9(-1.5;18.1)............15.1*(12.4;17.9)
Alagoas1-1919.2* (18.6;19.8)19-306.4*(5.3;7.4)........................14.2*(13.6;14.7)
Bahia1-915.9* (14.9;16.8)9-1513.1* (11.2;15.0)15-237.5* (6.5;8.6)23-329.9*(9.0;10.8)32-516.7*(6.5;7.0)......9.6*(9.3;10.0)
Southeast1-1231.0*(29.6;32.4)12-1912.6*(9.7;15.7)19-2223.4*(5.5;44.4)22-3110.8*(8.9;12.7)31-626.2*(6.0;6.4)......12.6*(11.6;13.5)
São Paulo1-351.8*(30.7;76.2)3-1125.8*(23.3;28.4)11-1812.3*(9.5;15.2)18-2128.9*(11.0;49.7)21-2910.7*(8.5;12.9)29-616.1*(5.8;6.3)12.3*(11.2;13.4)
Rio de Janeiro1-636.5*(33.2;39.8)6-2512.5*(12.1;12.8)25-556.4*(6.2;6.5)...............11.0*(10.7;11.3)
Espírito Santo1-717.3*(15.7;18.9)7-1812.1* (11.4;12.8)18-2220.7*(16.0;25.6)22-326.4*(5.6;7.2)32-3513.1*(4.5;22.5)35-465.9*(5.4;6.5)10.7*(10.0;11.5)
Minas Gerais1-1612.3*(11.7;13.0)16-525.2*(5.0;5.3)........................7.2*(7.0;7.4)
South1-347.9*(37.7;58.8)3-920.8*(18.9;22.8)9-2311.0*(10.6;11.4)23-403.8*(3.5;4.1)40-439.5*(2.0;17.6)43-554.7*(4.3;5.2)9.4*(8.8;9.9)
Paraná1-620.1*(18.2;22.1)6-1010.3*(6.4;14.3)10-1422.1*(17.8;26.5)14-228.4*(7.3;9.4)22-423.5*(3.3;3.7)42-522.6*(2.0;3.2)7.5*(7.0;8.0)
Rio Grande do Sul1-721.6*(19.6;23.7)7-199.7*(9.0;10.5)19-343.6*(3.1;4.1)34-535.8*(5.5;6.1)............7.8*(7.4;8.1)
Santa Catarina1-720.8*(18.1;23.5)7-199.3*(8.3;10.2)19-2218.1*(3.3;35.0)22-383.6*(3.0;4.2)38-4117.3*(2.6;34.1)41-535.1*(4.2;5.9)8.7*(7.4;9.9)
Midwest1-347.5*(36.9;58.8)3-1113.8*(12.7;14.9)11-208.1*(7.2;9.0)20-555.4*(5.3;5.5)............8.4*(8.0;8.7)
Mato Grosso1-712.9*(10.8;15.1)7-334.8*(4.6;5.0)33-397.2*(5.2;9.2)..................6.4*(6.0;6.9)
Mato Grosso do Sul1-107.3*(6.4;8.3)10-265.8*(5.3;6.2)26-362.3*(1.3;3.2)36-425.8*(4.0;7.6)............5.2*(4.8;5.7)
Goiás1-55.7*(2.4;9.0)5-1312.5*(11.0;14.0)13-228.8*(7.6;10.0)22-284.0*(1.7;6.3)28-348.6*(6.2;11.1)34-463.4*(2.8;4.0)7.0*(6.4;7.6)
Distrito Federal1-914.8*(13.9;15.7)9-167.6*(6.2;8.9)16-394.2*(4.0;4.4)39-546.8*(6.5;7.2)............6.9*(6.7;7.2)

AR-D: applicable range (day); DPC: daily percent change and AAPC: average daily percent change. *p < 0,05.

Table 2

Accumulated cases of COVID-19 for each Joinpoint's segment. Brazil and Federated Unit, 2020

Federative UnitsSegment 1Segment 2Segment 3Segment 4Segment 5Segment 6
AR-DnAR-DnAR-DnAR-DnAR-DnAR-Dn
Brazil1-121.54612-249.05624-3119.63831-63177.589............
North1-31053-72277-1242712-181.36018-4825.56548-5130.900
Amazonas1-51405-1026010-1580415-231.71923-262.04426-4914.168
Roraima1-1122211-2042520-301.12430-341.328......
Amapá1-73077-1547915-1979819-251.18725-281.93128-352.910
Pará1-51385-81708-211.26721-408.616......
Tocantins1-92469-18828........................
Rondônia1-3763-81998-1336413-1643316-251.22225-291.460
Acre1-1010110-1619516-2331123-2865728-341.33534-371.590
Northeast1-53085-223.24222-3816.29338-5558.316............
Maranhão1-5965-82308-1447814-191.20519-428.526......
Piauí1-61236-2174221-271.23327-301.443............
Ceará1-41634-201.29120-375.42137-5418.412............
Rio Grande do Norte1-4924-72127-1326313-361.39236-452.033......
Pernambuco1-71067-1681616-222.00622-356.87635-4714.309......
Paraíba1-61366-1430114-241.03424-342.777............
Sergipe1-1119711-1444714-231.58823-262.032............
Alagoas1-191.22619-302.580........................
Bahia1-92139-1543115-2375923-321.78932-516.204......
Southeast1-121.13512-192.50719-224.98822-3112.12531-6274.727......
São Paulo1-31363-1174511-181.51718-213.50621-298.21629-6147.719
Rio de Janeiro1-63056-252.85525-5518.486..................
Espírito Santo1-71397-1846318-2295222-321.87432-352.66235-465.087
Minas Gerais1-1652516-523.435........................
South1-31543-94639-231.97223-403.74140-434.95843-558.556
Paraná1-61196-1017910-1439514-2273822-421.49242-521.906
Rio Grande do Sul1-71957-1955519-3499434-532.917............
Santa Catarina1-71497-1945719-2273222-381.33738-412.08541-533.733
Midwest1-31383-1139911-2078320-555.090............
Mato Grosso1-71127-3337933-39591..................
Mato Grosso do Sul1-109710-2623426-3628836-42405............
Goiás1-5715-1317913-2237822-2848628-3478134-461.115
Distrito Federal1-92609-1645416-391.14639-542.979............

AR-D:applicable range (day).

Joinpoint analysis for accumulated cases of COVID-19 in Brazil by day, 2020 AR-D: applicable range (day); DPC: daily percent change and AAPC: average daily percent change. *p < 0,05. Accumulated cases of COVID-19 for each Joinpoint's segment. Brazil and Federated Unit, 2020 AR-D:applicable range (day). At region level, the highest ADPC values were found in the North, Northeast and Southeast regions. São Paulo presented the greatest increase at the beginning of the epidemic (segment 1: DPC = 51.8%; 95%CI = 30.7;76.2). In the last segment, São Paulo had a DPC of 6.1% (95%CI = 5.8;6.3), with a 6-fold increase in 32 days. As São Paulo, Amazonas, Pernambuco, Ceará, and Rio de Janeiro at a more advanced stage of the epidemic (around 45-50 days after the 50th case), compared other states, such as Rondônia, Sergipe and Tocantins. Some FUs, such as Pará, Pernambuco, São Paulo, Paraná, and Goiás showed a reduction in DPC in last segment in comparison with the previous one (Table 1). Discussion: Although all FUs presented upward trends in the number of cumulative cases of COVID-19, 18 out of 27 FUs showed a reduction in the pace of the trend in the last segment. This may be related to the non-pharmacological measures adopted [3], [4]. Despite the recent slowdown, 25 FUs still present significant upward trends. Some of them, such as Amazonas, Rio Grande do Sul, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul and Distrito Federal even showed an increase in the DPC in the last segment. We highlight that the FUs are at different stages of the epidemic, which can also explain those differences. Even though the FUs from the Southeast region presented most of the confirmed cases, the highest ADPC values were found in the Northeast and North regions. This is particularly troublesome because these regions present the lowest human development indices, and the highest proportion of poverty and low education rates in Brazil [5]. Some factors may have affected the inflections of the curves, such as the availability of diagnostic tests and the sensitivity of the epidemiological and laboratory surveillance system [4], [6]. As we used publicly available data, analyses were performed using the notification date rather than the symptoms onset date, as well as the cumulative cases instead of incident cases. In future analyzes, other information will be added to investigate the inflections in the curve of a given territory, such as the validity of municipal or state decrees (lockdown and other restrictive measures), the proportion of population isolation per day and the number of tests performed. In summary, our results show that all FUs in Brazil present upward trends of COVID-19. In some FUs, the slowdown in DPC in the last segment must be considered carefully. Each FU is at a different stage of the pandemic and, therefore, non-pharmacological measures must be applied accordingly. Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Conflict of interest statement: None Ethical approval: This work was developed with secondary data and approval by an ethics committee is not necessary. Author contributions: LOBO A.P had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and analysis. : All authors. : All authors. : LOBO A.P; CARDOSO-DOS-SANTOS, A.C; ROCHA M.S PINHEIRO, R.S; FRANÇA, G.V.S; BREMM J.M; MACARIO E.M; OLIVEIRA W.K : LOBO A.P.
  4 in total

1.  The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) emergency and the role of timely and effective national health surveillance.

Authors:  Raquel Martins Lana; Flávio Codeço Coelho; Marcelo Ferreira da Costa Gomes; Oswaldo Gonçalves Cruz; Leonardo Soares Bastos; Daniel Antunes Maciel Villela; Cláudia Torres Codeço
Journal:  Cad Saude Publica       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 1.632

2.  COVID-19 in Latin America.

Authors:  Talha Burki
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID-19: a rapid review.

Authors:  Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit; Verena Mayr; Andreea Iulia Dobrescu; Andrea Chapman; Emma Persad; Irma Klerings; Gernot Wagner; Uwe Siebert; Claudia Christof; Casey Zachariah; Gerald Gartlehner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-08

4.  Transmission dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak and effectiveness of government interventions: A data-driven analysis.

Authors:  Yaqing Fang; Yiting Nie; Marshare Penny
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 20.693

  4 in total
  11 in total

1.  Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer-Related Hospitalizations in Brazil.

Authors:  Allini Mafra da Costa; Aline L Ribeiro; Adeylson G Ribeiro; Andrea Gini; Citadel Cabasag; Rui M Reis; José Humberto T G Fregnani; Isabelle Soerjomataram
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

2.  Targeted Prevention of COVID-19, a Strategy to Focus on Protecting Potential Victims, Instead of Focusing on Viral Transmission.

Authors:  Rajaram Govindarajan
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-09-02

3.  Absence of detection of RSV and influenza during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Brazilian cohort: Likely role of lower transmission in the community.

Authors:  Fernanda Hammes Varela; Marcelo Comerlato Scotta; Márcia Polese-Bonatto; Ivaine Tais Sauthier Sartor; Charles Francisco Ferreira; Ingrid Rodrigues Fernandes; Gabriela Oliveira Zavaglia; Walquiria Aparecida Ferreira de Almeida; Denise Arakaki-Sanchez; Leonardo Araújo Pinto; Gisele Alsina Nader Bastos; Luiz Antônio Nasi; Maicon Falavigna; Paulo Márcio Pitrez; Renato T Stein
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.413

4.  Inverse problem for adaptive SIR model: Application to COVID-19 in Latin America.

Authors:  Tchavdar T Marinov; Rossitza S Marinova
Journal:  Infect Dis Model       Date:  2021-12-16

5.  Predictors of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms in Brazil during COVID-19.

Authors:  Stephen X Zhang; Hao Huang; Jizhen Li; Mayra Antonelli-Ponti; Scheila Farias de Paiva; José Aparecido da Silva
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Coronavirus outbreak from early career psychiatrists' viewpoint: What we have learned so far.

Authors:  Renato de Filippis; Joan Soler-Vidal; Victor Pereira-Sanchez; Margaret Isioma Ojeahere; Kana Morimoto; Alice Chang; Andre Luiz Schuh Teixeira; Alex Vicente Spadini
Journal:  Perspect Psychiatr Care       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.223

7.  Increasing molecular diagnostic capacity and COVID-19 incidence in Brazil.

Authors:  Rejane Maria Tommasini Grotto; Rodrigo Santos Lima; Gabriel Berg de Almeida; Claudia Pio Ferreira; Raul Borges Guimarães; Micheli Pronunciate; Edmur Azevedo; Rafael de Castro Catão; Carlos Magno Castelo Branco Fortaleza
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.451

8.  Increased incidence of candidemia in a tertiary care hospital with the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Marcio Nucci; Gloria Barreiros; Luiz Felipe Guimarães; Vitor A S Deriquehem; Anna Carla Castiñeiras; Simone A Nouér
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.931

9.  Modeling the survival times of the COVID-19 patients with a new statistical model: A case study from China.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Liu; Zubair Ahmad; Ahmed M Gemeay; Alanazi Talal Abdulrahman; E H Hafez; N Khalil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Oral Manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Comprehensive Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Study.

Authors:  Ciro D Soares; Lucas L Souza; Maria G F de Carvalho; Hélder A R Pontes; Adalberto Mosqueda-Taylor; Juan C Hernandez-Guerrero; Sanderson D do Nascimento Medeiros; Alexandre de Oliveira Sales; Fábio A Alves; Clóvis A Lopes Pinto; Oslei P de Almeida
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 6.394

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.