| Literature DB >> 32560727 |
Xiaojing Fan1, Meghan Bruce Kumar2,3, Zhongliang Zhou4, Ching-Hung Lee1, Duolao Wang5, Haixia Liu6, Shaonong Dang7, Jianmin Gao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Continuum of care for maternal health services (CMHS) is a proven approach to improve health and safety for mothers and newborns. This study aims to explore the influence of China's 2009 healthcare reform on improving the CMHS utilisation.Entities:
Keywords: China; Continuum of care for maternal health services; Equity; Healthcare reform; National Health Service Surveys
Year: 2020 PMID: 32560727 PMCID: PMC7304157 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-020-01179-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Equity Health ISSN: 1475-9276
Fig. 1Study flow chart
Distribution of continuum of care for maternal health service utilisation among maternal women’s socioeconomic characteristics (n = 2332)
| Variables | Urban ( | Rural ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | No | Yes | |||
| Healthcare reform | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Before | 167(29.61) | 55(15.80) | 336(40.88) | 80(13.38) | ||
| After | 397(70.39) | 293(84.20) | 486(59.12) | 518(86.62) | ||
| Age (years) | 0.019 | 0.789 | ||||
| ≤ 25 | 142(25.18) | 104(29.89) | 278(33.82) | 210(35.12) | ||
| 26–30 | 239(42.38) | 161(46.26) | 258(31.39) | 190(31.77) | ||
| ≥ 31 | 183(32.45) | 83(23.85) | 286(34.79) | 198(33.11) | ||
| Education | 0.025 | < 0.001 | ||||
| ≤ Primary school | 62(10.99) | 20(5.78) | 250(30.53) | 98(16.39) | ||
| Middle school | 272(48.23) | 171(49.42) | 460(56.17) | 381(63.71) | ||
| ≥ High school | 230(40.78) | 155(44.80) | 109(13.31) | 119(19.90) | ||
| Employment | 0.090 | 0.885 | ||||
| No | 206(36.52) | 108(31.03) | 126(15.33) | 90(15.05) | ||
| Yes | 358(63.48) | 240(68.97) | 696(84.67) | 508(84.95) | ||
| Annual personal expenditure (Chinese Yuan) | 0.314 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Poorest | 60(10.66) | 30(8.62) | 270(32.89) | 104(17.42) | ||
| Poorer | 86(15.28) | 53(15.23) | 192(23.39) | 132(22.11) | ||
| Middle | 120(21.31) | 63(18.10) | 144(17.54) | 142(23.79) | ||
| Richer | 114(20.25) | 89(25.57) | 140(17.05) | 123(20.60) | ||
| Richest | 183(32.50) | 113(32.47) | 75(9.14) | 96(16.08) | ||
| Health score | 86.54 ± 8.78 | 88.58 ± 7.61 | < 0.001 | 85.93 ± 9.20 | 87.45 ± 8.39 | < 0.001 |
| Health insurance | 0.033 | 0.280 | ||||
| No | 92(16.31) | 39(11.21) | 24(2.92) | 12(2.01) | ||
| Yes | 472(83.69) | 309(88.79) | 798(97.08) | 586(97.99) | ||
| Chronic disease | 0.024 | 0.510 | ||||
| No | 536(95.04) | 341(97.99) | 792(96.35) | 580(96.99) | ||
| Yes | 28(4.96) | 7(2.01) | 30(3.65) | 18(3.01) | ||
| Parity | 0.064 | 0.015 | ||||
| 1 | 368(65.36) | 248(71.26) | 402(49.14) | 332(55.70) | ||
| ≥ 2 | 195(34.64) | 100(28.74) | 416(50.86) | 264(44.30) | ||
Fig. 2Comparison of continuous maternal health service utilisation before and after healthcare reform
Determinants of continuum of care for maternal health service utilisation by generalised linear mixed model (n = 2332)
| Variables | Urban ( | Rural (n = 1420) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95%CL | OR | 95%CL | |||
| Healthcare reform | ||||||
| Before | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| After | 5.02 | 1.90,13.31 | 0.001 | 14.70 | 5.43,39.76 | < 0.001 |
| Age (years) | ||||||
| ≤ 25 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| 26–30 | 1.10 | 0.62,1.96 | 0.741 | 1.40 | 0.80,2.44 | 0.239 |
| ≥ 31 | 0.78 | 0.38,1.59 | 0.493 | 2.49 | 1.23,5.06 | 0.012 |
| Education | ||||||
| ≤ Primary school | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Middle school | 2.62 | 0.98,7.03 | 0.056 | 3.11 | 1.64,5.92 | 0.001 |
| ≥ High school | 4.18 | 1.30,13.44 | 0.016 | 4.55 | 1.88,11.01 | 0.001 |
| Employment | ||||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Yes | 1.47 | 0.86,2.49 | 0.156 | 1.12 | 0.62,2.03 | 0.697 |
| Annual personal expenditure (Chinese Yuan) | ||||||
| Poorest | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Poorer | 0.94 | 0.35,2.50 | 0.899 | 1.27 | 0.67,2.41 | 0.454 |
| Middle | 0.64 | 0.24,1.67 | 0.357 | 1.70 | 0.85,3.41 | 0.132 |
| Richer | 0.96 | 0.37,2.47 | 0.934 | 1.04 | 0.51,2.12 | 0.910 |
| Richest | 0.51 | 0.19,1.37 | 0.183 | 1.94 | 0.86,4.39 | 0.112 |
| Health score | 1.03 | 1.00,1.07 | 0.051 | 1.02 | 0.99,1.05 | 0.147 |
| Health insurance | ||||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Yes | 2.67 | 1.13,6.30 | 0.026 | 4.25 | 1.00,18.13 | 0.05 |
| Chronic disease | ||||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Yes | 0.35 | 0.08,1.49 | 0.156 | 0.75 | 0.23,2.50 | 0.642 |
| Parity | ||||||
| 1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| ≥ 2 | 0.62 | 0.32,1.20 | 0.155 | 0.40 | 0.21,0.75 | 0.005 |
Abbreviations: OR odds ratio, CL confidence limits
Fig. 3Concentration curves on continuum of care for maternal health service utilisation before and after healthcare reform
Inequality of urban and rural women’s continuum of care for maternal health service utilisation before and after healthcare reform (n = 2332)
| Area | Before healthcare reform | After healthcare reform | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CI | 95% CL | CI | 95% CL | ||||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | ||||
| Urban | 0.130 | −0.026 | 0.411 | − 0.041 | − 0.096 | 0.007 | 0.021 |
| Rural | 0.104 | −0.012 | 0.222 | 0.019 | − 0.014 | 0.060 | 0.170 |
Abbreviations: CI concentration index, CL confidence limits
Decomposition analysis of concentration index on urban women’s continuum of care for maternal health service utilisation before and after healthcare reform (n = 912)
| Variables | Before healthcare reform ( | After healthcare reform ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elasticity | CI | Contribution to CI | % | Elasticity | CI | Contribution to CI | % | |
| Age (years) | ||||||||
| ≤ 25 | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| 26–30 | − 0.286 | 0.062 | − 0.018 | −13.70 | 0.080 | 0.033 | 0.002 | −6.42 |
| ≥ 31 | −0.138 | 0.012 | −0.002 | −1.30 | 0.005 | −0.039 | − 0.0002 | 0.50 |
| Education | ||||||||
| ≤ Primary school | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Middle school | 1.491 | −0.234 | −0.350 | − 268.90 | 0.200 | − 0.077 | − 0.015 | 37.40 |
| ≥ High school | 2.210 | 0.175 | 0.387 | 297.50 | 0.135 | 0.142 | 0.019 | −46.98 |
| Employment | ||||||||
| No | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Yes | −0.029 | −0.444 | 0.001 | 0.99 | 0.153 | −0.009 | −0.001 | 3.37 |
| Annual personal expenditure (Chinese Yuan) | ||||||||
| Poor | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Poorer | 0.055 | −0.069 | −0.004 | −2.96 | − 0.056 | −0.770 | 0.043 | − 105.54 |
| Middle | −0.004 | 0.280 | −0.001 | −0.96 | − 0.104 | −0.357 | 0.037 | −90.68 |
| Richer | 0.072 | 0.449 | 0.033 | 25.01 | −0.107 | −0.066 | − 0.007 | 17.16 |
| Richest | 0.040 | 0.545 | 0.022 | 16.95 | −0.253 | 0.480 | −0.121 | 296.16 |
| Health score | 2.961 | 0.005 | 0.014 | 10.47 | 0.621 | 0.003 | 0.002 | −4.74 |
| Health insurance | ||||||||
| No | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Yes | 0.289 | −0.078 | −0.023 | −17.40 | 0.275 | −0.036 | − 0.010 | 24.08 |
| Chronic disease | ||||||||
| No | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Yes | −0.012 | 0.029 | − 0.0003 | −0.27 | − 0.012 | −0.202 | 0.002 | −6.04 |
| Parity | ||||||||
| 1 | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| ≥ 2 | −0.219 | −0.029 | 0.006 | 4.82 | −0.281 | −0.018 | 0.005 | −11.99 |
| Needs variables | – | – | −0.006 | −4.80 | – | – | 0.006 | −16.70 |
| HI4 | – | – | 0.136 | – | – | – | −0.047 | – |
Abbreviations: CI concentration index, % pure percentage contributions of determinants to the socioeconomic inequality in continuum of maternal health service utilisation, HI horizontal inequity index. Needs variables mean contribution of factors to CI, including age, health score and chronic disease
Decomposition analysis of concentration index on rural women’s continuum of care for maternal health service utilisation before and after healthcare reform (n = 1420)
| Variables | Before healthcare reform ( | After healthcare reform ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elasticity | CI | Contribution to CI | % | Elasticity | CI | Contribution to CI | % | |
| Age (years) | ||||||||
| ≤ 25 | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| 26–30 | −0.004 | 0.033 | −0.0001 | −0.14 | 0.031 | −0.014 | − 0.0004 | −2.29 |
| ≥ 31 | 0.284 | −0.023 | −0.007 | −6.38 | 0.058 | −0.022 | − 0.001 | − 6.69 |
| Education | ||||||||
| ≤ Primary school | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Middle school | 0.350 | 0.029 | 0.010 | 9.70 | 0.160 | −0.011 | −0.002 | −8.87 |
| ≥ High school | 0.135 | 0.131 | 0.018 | 17.09 | 0.058 | 0.154 | 0.009 | 47.40 |
| Employment | ||||||||
| No | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Yes | −0.104 | 0.0003 | −0.0001 | − 0.03 | 0.059 | 0.002 | 0.0001 | 0.64 |
| Annual personal expenditure (Chinese Yuan) | ||||||||
| Poor | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Poorer | 0.048 | 0.288 | 0.014 | 13.29 | 0.005 | −0.413 | −0.002 | −11.71 |
| Middle | 0.032 | 0.661 | 0.021 | 20.16 | 0.025 | −0.008 | − 0.002 | −10.57 |
| Richer | 0.006 | 0.875 | 0.006 | 5.316 | −0.005 | 0.329 | −0.002 | −9.12 |
| Richest | 0.034 | 1.072 | 0.036 | 34.82 | 0.019 | 0.755 | 0.015 | 77.19 |
| Health score | −0.005 | −0.001 | 0.000 | 0.004 | 0.620 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 6.33 |
| Health insurance | ||||||||
| No | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Yes | 0.722 | 0.0004 | 0.0003 | 0.29 | 0.303 | −0.006 | −0.002 | −10.01 |
| Parity | ||||||||
| 1 | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| ≥2 | −0.918 | −0.005 | 0.004 | 4.22 | −0.315 | −0.003 | 0.001 | 4.38 |
| Needs variables | – | – | −0.007 | −6.52 | – | – | −0.0004 | −2.65 |
| HI4 | – | – | 0.111 | – | – | – | 0.0194 | – |
Abbreviations: CI concentration index; % Pure percentage contributions of determinants to the socioeconomic inequality in continuum of maternal health service utilisation; HI Horizontal inequity index. Needs variables mean contribution of factors to CI, including age and health score