| Literature DB >> 30183720 |
Ruo Zhang1, Shanshan Li1, Chao Li1, Doudou Zhao1, Leqian Guo1, Pengfei Qu1, Danmeng Liu1, Shaonong Dang1, Hong Yan1,2.
Abstract
Prenatal health care interventions are effective ways to improve maternal and neonatal health. There have been few large investigations conducted on the inequalities in maternal health services utilization in Shaanxi Province of west China since the health care reform in 2009. This study examined the inequalities and determinants of maternal health services utilization in Shaanxi Province. A household survey was conducted from August to November in 2013. By using a multistage sampling method, local women aged 15-49 who had given birth in the preceding three years were recruited. Information including social-demographic characteristics and maternal health services utilization was collected through a face-to-face interview. A concentration index approach was used to measure inequalities in maternal health services utilization. A logistic regression model was employed to investigate the determinants of maternal health services utilization. There were 8,488 women from urban areas and 18,724 women from rural areas enrolled in this study. The concentration index for all the indicators of maternal health services utilization showed significance in these two areas. In urban areas, the concentration index of having 5 or more prenatal visits, receiving the first prenatal visit within 12 weeks, delivering at secondary- or higher-level health facilities and delivering by C-section were 0.0356, 0.0166, 0.0177 and 0.0591, respectively, while in rural areas, the corresponding figures were 0.0385, 0.0183, 0.0334 and 0.0566, respectively. The determinants related to maternal health services utilization were women's age at delivery, educational level, employment status, parity, health problems during pregnancy and household income. Inequalities in maternal health services utilization still exist in Shaanxi Province. Providing maternal health services for younger, less educated, unemployed, high parity and poorer women, especially in rural areas, is expected to reduce the inequalities in maternal health services utilization.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30183720 PMCID: PMC6124721 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline characteristics of pregnant women by urban and rural areas.
| n | Urban | Rural | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of pregnant women | 27212 | 8488 | 18724 | |
| Age at delivery, years | 27.03±4.76 | 27.26±4.37 | 26.93±4.92 | <0.001 |
| Age at delivery, years | <0.001 | |||
| <25 | 10358 | 2729 (32.9) | 7629 (41.3) | |
| 25–29 | 10176 | 3694 (44.5) | 6482 (35.1) | |
| ≥30 | 6260 | 1878 (22.6) | 4382 (23.7) | |
| Education | <0.001 | |||
| Senior high school or above | 10077 | 5059 (59.7) | 5018 (26.9) | |
| Junior high school | 13714 | 2967 (35.0) | 10747 (57.5) | |
| Primary school or less | 3372 | 448 (5.3) | 2924 (15.6) | |
| Employment status | <0.001 | |||
| Employed | 8859 | 4349 (51.6) | 4510 (24.2) | |
| Unemployed | 18188 | 4073 (48.4) | 14115 (75.8) | |
| Parity | <0.001 | |||
| 1 | 13806 | 5073 (60.0) | 8733 (46.8) | |
| ≥2 | 13326 | 3381 (40.0) | 9945 (53.2) | |
| Presence of health problems | 0.064 | |||
| Yes | 14027 | 4307 (51.0) | 9720 (52.2) | |
| No | 13020 | 4134 (49.0) | 8886 (47.8) | |
| Annual household income | <0.001 | |||
| Poorest | 5443 | 950 (11.2) | 4493 (24.0) | |
| Second poorest | 5442 | 1179 (13.9) | 4263 (22.8) | |
| Middle | 5442 | 1472 (17.3) | 3970 (21.2) | |
| Second richest | 5442 | 2148 (25.3) | 3294 (17.6) | |
| Richest | 5443 | 2739 (32.3) | 2704 (14.4) |
Timing and frequency of prenatal visits and delivery care by annual household income in urban and rural areas.
| Annual household income | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poorest | Second poorest | Middle | Second richest | Richest | ||
| ≥5 prenatal visits | ||||||
| Urban | 729 (78.2) | 848 (75.8) | 1128 (78.9) | 1707 (81.6) | 2356 (86.9) | 6768 (81.7) |
| Rural | 2519 (57.3) | 2529 (60.0) | 2423 (61.8) | 2025 (62.3) | 1714 (64.0) | 11210 (60.7) |
| First prenatal visit within 12 weeks | ||||||
| Urban | 797 (86.3) | 1005 (87.3) | 1296 (89.7) | 1928 (91.1) | 2474 (91.6) | 7500 (89.9) |
| Rural | 3496 (81.4) | 3467 (84.0) | 3266 (85.0) | 2701 (84.6) | 2286 (86.4) | 15216 (84.1) |
| Delivery at secondary- or higher-level health facilities | ||||||
| Urban | 831 (88.3) | 1062 (90.9) | 1364 (93.6) | 2019 (94.7) | 2602 (96.0) | 7878 (93.7) |
| Rural | 3504 (80.1) | 3486 (83.7) | 3330 (85.5) | 2867 (88.9) | 2430 (91.1) | 15617 (85.2) |
| C-section | ||||||
| Urban | 407 (43.8) | 467 (40.4) | 628 (43.5) | 920 (43.3) | 1302 (48.3) | 3724 (44.6) |
| Rural | 1257 (28.3) | 1133 (26.8) | 1114 (28.3) | 992 (30.4) | 835 (31.1) | 5331 (28.7) |
The concentration index for maternal health services utilization by urban and rural areas.
| Urban | Rural | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CI | 95% confidence interval | CI | 95% confidence interval | |
| ≥5 prenatal visits | 0.0356 | 0.0299, 0.0416 | 0.0385 | 0.0320, 0.0454 |
| First prenatal visit ≤12 weeks | 0.0166 | 0.0124, 0.0207 | 0.0183 | 0.0147, 0.0220 |
| Delivery at secondary- or higher-level health facilities | 0.0177 | 0.0145, 0.0209 | 0.0334 | 0.0301, 0.0370 |
| C-section | 0.0591 | 0.0454, 0.0730 | 0.0566 | 0.0434, 0.0697 |
* P<0.05.
Multivariate logistic regression of maternal health services utilization in urban areas.
| Prenatal Health Care Services | Delivery Outcomes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | ≥5 prenatal visits | First prenatal visit ≤12 weeks | Delivery at secondary- or higher-level health facilities | C-section |
| OR (95% confidence interval) | OR (95% confidence interval) | OR (95% confidence interval) | OR (95% confidence interval) | |
| Age at delivery, years | ||||
| <25 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| 25–29 | 1.31 | 1.15 (0.96, 1.38) | 1.32 | 1.17 |
| ≥30 | 1.62 | 0.86 (0.70, 1.06) | 1.57 | 1.68 |
| Education | ||||
| Senior high school or above | 5.32 | 2.58 | 1.48 | 1.87 |
| Junior high school | 2.57 | 1.79 | 0.94 (0.65, 1.35) | 1.50 |
| Primary school or less | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Employment status | ||||
| Employed | 1.45 | 1.19 | 1.08 (0.88, 1.32) | 1.01 (0.91, 1.11) |
| Unemployed | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Parity | ||||
| 1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| ≥2 | 0.75 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.89 |
| Presence of health problems | ||||
| Yes | 1.16 | 1.14 (0.98, 1.32) | 0.91 (0.76, 1.09) | 1.09 (1.00, 1.19) |
| No | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Annual household income | ||||
| Poorest | 0.96 (0.78, 1.18) | 0.81 (0.63, 1.05) | 0.43 | 1.03 (0.87, 1.21) |
| Second poorest | 0.82 | 0.83 (0.65, 1.05) | 0.57 | 0.86 |
| Middle | 0.84 (0.70, 1.01) | 1.02 (0.81, 1.28) | 0.78 (0.58, 1.05) | 0.93 (0.81, 1.07) |
| Second richest | 0.82 | 1.07 (0.87, 1.32) | 0.83 (0.63, 1.09) | 0.87 |
| Richest | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
* P<0.05.
Multivariate logistic regression of maternal health services utilization in rural areas.
| Prenatal Health Care Services | Delivery Outcomes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | ≥5 prenatal visits | First prenatal visit ≤12 weeks | Delivery at secondary- or higher-level health facilities | C-section |
| OR (95% confidence interval) | OR (95% confidence interval) | OR (95% confidence interval) | OR (95% confidence interval) | |
| Age at delivery, years | ||||
| <25 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| 25–29 | 1.22 | 1.00 (0.90, 1.11) | 1.02 (0.92, 1.14) | 1.29 |
| ≥30 | 1.21 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 1.69 |
| Education | ||||
| Senior high school or above | 2.43 | 1.81 | 1.76 | 1.39 |
| Junior high school | 1.77 | 1.68 | 1.15 | 1.21 |
| Primary school or less | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Employment status | ||||
| Employed | 1.05 (0.97, 1.14) | 1.09 (0.98, 1.22) | 1.11 (0.99, 1.25) | 1.23 |
| Unemployed | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Parity | ||||
| 1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| ≥2 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.73 |
| Presence of health problems | ||||
| Yes | 1.23 | 1.21 | 0.84 | 1.24 |
| No | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Annual household income | ||||
| Poorest | 0.97 (0.87, 1.07) | 0.89 (0.77, 1.02) | 0.51 | 1.00 (0.90, 1.12) |
| Second poorest | 1.03 (0.93, 1.15) | 0.99 (0.86, 1.14) | 0.62 | 0.92 (0.82, 1.03) |
| Middle | 1.06 (0.95, 1.18) | 1.03 (0.89, 1.19) | 0.68 | 0.98 (0.88, 1.10) |
| Second richest | 1.05 (0.94, 1.17) | 0.94 (0.81, 1.10) | 0.87 (0.73, 1.04) | 1.03 (0.92, 1.16) |
| Richest | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
* P<0.05.