| Literature DB >> 27188624 |
Patrick Opiyo Owili1, Miriam Adoyo Muga2, Yiing-Jenq Chou3, Yi-Hsin Elsa Hsu4, Nicole Huang5, Li-Yin Chien6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the progress in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) 4 and 5, inequity in the utilization of maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) care services still remain high in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). The continuum of care for MNCH that recognizes a tight inter-relationship between maternal, newborn and child health at different time periods and location is key towards reducing inequity in health. In this study, we explored the distributions in the utilization MNCH services in 12 SSA countries and further investigated the associations in the continuum of care for MNCH.Entities:
Keywords: Continuum of care; Maternal, newborn and child health; Structural equation modeling; Sub-Saharan Africa
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27188624 PMCID: PMC4869316 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3075-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Fig. 1The conceptual model of the continuum of care for maternal, newborn and child health
Fig. 2The distribution of the proportion of women who adequately utilized maternal, newborn and child health care in the 12 sub-Saharan Africa countries. a Adequate antenatal care, b adequate delivery care, c adequate postnatal care and d adequate child’s immunization
Proportion of women aged 15–49, who had a live birth in the 5 years preceding the survey, according to maternal and child health care utilization indicators in 12 sub-Saharan Africa countries
| Characteristics |
| Adequate antenatal care | Adequate delivery care | Adequate postnatal care | Adequate immunization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 100 | 8.8 | 54.8 | 35.2 | 31.7 |
| Country, year | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| DR Congo, 2013/14 | 13.6 | 4.8 | 78.3 | 20.2 | 20.5 |
| Gambia, 2013 | 5.8 | 10.2 | 62.7 | 57.4 | 55.0 |
| Liberia, 2013 | 4.8 | 30.3 | 55.1 | 55.2 | 31.4 |
| Mali, 2012/13 | 7.7 | 4.7 | 39.2 | 27.5 | 18.7 |
| Namibia, 2013 | 3.5 | 8.4 | 87.4 | 55.5 | 46.3 |
| Nigeria, 2013 | 23.5 | 7.1 | 34.4 | 23.7 | 15.3 |
| Rwanda, 2010 | 6.7 | 3.3 | 69.0 | 10.5 | 63.2 |
| Senegal, 2013 | 4.6 | 22.6 | 58.2 | 54.2 | 40.1 |
| Sierra Leone, 2013 | 9.0 | 14.2 | 54.0 | 54.2 | 49.4 |
| Tanzania, 2010 | 6.0 | 2.7 | 50.0 | 17.5 | 35.9 |
| Togo, 2013/14 | 4.9 | 7.6 | 45.0 | 50.1 | 38.7 |
| Zambia, 2013/14 | 9.9 | 7.5 | 64.1 | 53.1 | 29.2 |
| Marital status | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| Married | 88.2 | 8.5 | 52.8 | 33.5 | 31.1 |
| Formerly married | 5.6 | 10.0 | 61.7 | 38.4 | 33.2 |
| Unmarried | 6.2 | 12.5 | 76.8 | 56.6 | 38.1 |
| Age group | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| ≤ 20 | 10.7 | 9.3 | 52.2 | 40.0 | 22.4 |
| 21–25 | 23.4 | 8.4 | 56.2 | 33.7 | 29.6 |
| 26–30 | 28.1 | 8.8 | 55.9 | 33.4 | 33.1 |
| 31–35 | 18.7 | 9.2 | 56.0 | 36.1 | 34.8 |
| 36–40 | 12.6 | 8.7 | 52.8 | 35.5 | 33.9 |
| ≥ 41 | 6.5 | 8.9 | 49.6 | 36.9 | 34.9 |
| Birth order | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| 1st | 20.5 | 10.3 | 65.6 | 37.1 | 35.1 |
| 2nd | 19.9 | 9.9 | 62.4 | 38.5 | 34.5 |
| 3rd–4th | 27.5 | 9.1 | 52.7 | 34.4 | 31.0 |
| > 4th | 32.1 | 6.9 | 44.5 | 32.4 | 27.9 |
| Family size | *** | *** | *** | ||
| ≤ 6 | 21.3 | 10.3 | 60.2 | 37.4 | 31.9 |
| > 6 | 78.7 | 8.4 | 53.3 | 34.6 | 31.6 |
| Number of under-5, | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| ≤ 2 | 70.1 | 9.7 | 57.9 | 38.2 | 33.0 |
| > 2 | 29.9 | 6.7 | 47.7 | 27.9 | 28.3 |
| Residence | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| Urban | 32.1 | 14.1 | 77.2 | 49.4 | 38.8 |
| Rural | 67.9 | 6.3 | 44.2 | 28.5 | 28.3 |
| Mother’s education | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| No education | 41.4 | 7.0 | 35.8 | 29.0 | 26.1 |
| Primary | 32.8 | 7.0 | 59.3 | 31.4 | 33.8 |
| Secondary & higher | 25.8 | 14.1 | 79.5 | 49.9 | 37.9 |
| Wealth index | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| Poorest | 22.7 | 4.7 | 34.8 | 24.0 | 24.1 |
| Poor | 22.2 | 5.9 | 41.7 | 28.6 | 26.7 |
| Middle | 20.3 | 8.3 | 52.5 | 34.8 | 30.9 |
| Rich | 18.7 | 10.7 | 70.2 | 42.8 | 36.4 |
| Richest | 16.1 | 17.1 | 86.1 | 51.8 | 44.7 |
| Media exposure | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| Not exposed | 31.2 | 5.2 | 41.9 | 24.5 | 21.0 |
| Any one | 32.7 | 7.8 | 49.7 | 33.2 | 34.0 |
| Any two | 26.6 | 11.4 | 65.7 | 43.9 | 36.7 |
| All three | 9.5 | 17.0 | 84.3 | 53.1 | 44.5 |
| Mother’s employment | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| Unemployed | 28.4 | 8.5 | 54.9 | 36.1 | 27.8 |
| Professional | 2.1 | 17.9 | 89.6 | 56.0 | 44.8 |
| Middle level jobs | 23.2 | 10.6 | 57.3 | 37.7 | 28.0 |
| Agriculture | 34.4 | 5.7 | 49.4 | 27.8 | 35.0 |
| Other | 11.9 | 11.3 | 59.1 | 43.0 | 35.9 |
| Father’s employment | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| Unemployed | 9.2 | 5.5 | 42.0 | 28.9 | 20.6 |
| Professional | 8.0 | 12.8 | 70.1 | 42.6 | 34.3 |
| Middle level jobs | 12.1 | 10.5 | 58.0 | 37.0 | 29.5 |
| Agriculture | 42.8 | 5.6 | 43.6 | 26.4 | 29.7 |
| Other | 27.9 | 11.9 | 64.6 | 42.0 | 36.3 |
| Father’s education | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| No education | 36.7 | 6.9 | 34.9 | 29.6 | 27.2 |
| Primary | 26.5 | 5.9 | 53.8 | 27.0 | 33.8 |
| Secondary | 30.1 | 10.4 | 69.4 | 40.0 | 31.7 |
| Higher | 6.8 | 18.7 | 78.6 | 51.7 | 39.1 |
| Baby’s size | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| Very large | 14.1 | 11.4 | 57.8 | 37.8 | 32.3 |
| > Average | 26.8 | 9.3 | 57.8 | 36.5 | 33.5 |
| Average | 43.3 | 8.1 | 54.6 | 34.9 | 31.8 |
| < Average | 10.8 | 8.1 | 52.7 | 33.7 | 30.3 |
| Very small | 5.0 | 9.8 | 50.4 | 35.6 | 28.2 |
| Baby’s sex | ** | ||||
| Male | 50.5 | 8.9 | 55.3 | 35.2 | 31.7 |
| Female | 49.5 | 8.8 | 54.3 | 35.1 | 31.7 |
| Baby’s age, years | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| < 1 | 21.2 | 12.2 | 57.8 | 50.1 | 9.0 |
| 1 | 20.3 | 12.3 | 56.9 | 50.4 | 44.2 |
| 2 | 19.4 | 10.0 | 56.2 | 38.6 | 43.3 |
| 3 | 19.8 | 6.2 | 53.4 | 24.0 | 39.3 |
| 4 | 19.3 | 4.3 | 52.5 | 17.2 | 36.6 |
**p <0.01; *** p < 0.001
Fig. 3The standardized parameter estimates of the continuum of care for maternal, newborn and child health care of the 12 sub-Saharan Africa countries. The oval-shaped are latent variables and the rectangle-shaped are the measurements
Parameter estimates of measurement variables of the continuum of care for maternal and newborn health care of 12 sub Saharan Africa countries (n = 137,505)
| Code | Variable | Std. est.a | Std. err. |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VACCINAT | ADEQUATE IMMUNIZATION | |||
| Polio0 | Polio 0 | 0.52b | - | - |
| BCG | BCG | 0.79 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| DPT1 | DPT 1 | 0.90 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| Polio1 | Polio 1 | 0.72 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| DPT2 | DPT 2 | 0.93 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| Polio2 | Polio 2 | 0.74 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| DPT3 | DPT 3 | 0.83 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| Polio3 | Polio 3 | 0.57 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| measle | Measles | 0.69 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| POSTNAT | ADEQUATE POSTNATAL CARE | |||
| POSTCHEC | PNC after delivery | 0.99b | - | - |
| POSTIME | PNC in 24 h after delivery | 0.66 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| DISCHEC | Checked before discharge | 0.98 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| BABYPOST | Newborn care after birth | 0.31 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| BABYTIME | Newborn care in 24 h after birth | 0.29 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| BABYPROF | Skilled newborn care after birth | 0.34 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| DELIVERY | ADEQUATE DELIVERY CARE | |||
| FACDELIV | Delivered at the facility | 0.97b | - | - |
| PROFDELV | Skilled birth attendance | 0.87 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| CSECTION | Caesarean section | 0.18 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| ANTENAT | ADEQUATE ANTENATAL CARE | |||
| ANC | ANC contact | 0.96b | - | - |
| ANC4 | ≥4 ANC visits | 0.46 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| ANCTRI | First trimester visit | 0.28 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| ANCPROF | Skilled ANC | 0.79 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| ANCFAC | Health facility-based ANC | 0.88 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| ANCSERV | Essential ANC services | 0.33 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| PERSONAL | INDIVIDUAL & FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS | |||
| MARITAL | Marital status | 0.07 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| AGEGRP | Age group | 0.40 | 0.009 | <0.001 |
| BORD | Birth order | 1.63 | 0.03 | <0.001 |
| HHNO | Family size | −0.03 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| UNDER5NO | No. of under-5 children | 0.09 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| COMMUN | COMMUNITY’S CHARACTERISTICS | |||
| COUNTRY | Country | 1.00 | 0.007 | <0.001 |
| REGION | Province | 0.96 | 0.08 | <0.001 |
| STRATA | Residence | 0.95 | 0.42 | <0.001 |
| SES | SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS | |||
| EDUCAT | Mother’s education | 0.77 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
| WEALTH | Wealth index | 0.61 | 0.004 | <0.001 |
| MEDIA | Media exposure | 0.55 | 0.003 | <0.001 |
| WOMJOB | Mother’s employment | −0.07 | 0.004 | <0.001 |
| MANJOB | Father’s employment | 0.01 | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| MANEDUC | Father’s education | 0.68 | 0.003 | <0.001 |
| BABY | BABY’S CHARACTERISTICS | |||
| BABYSIZE | Size at birth | 0.01 | 0.003 | <0.001 |
| BABYSEX | Sex | −0.000 | 0.001 | 0.522 |
| AGEYRS | Age in years | −0.95 | 0.003 | <0.001 |
| AGEMTHS | Age in months | −1.03 | 0.04 | <0.001 |
a The Full Information Maximum Likelihood estimation procedure took into account the missing at random (MAR) and missing completely at random (MCAR) data
b Reference indicator (with a unit factor loading) to set the scale of each of the endogenous latent (ETA) variables of the model; Std. est., standardized estimate; Std. err., standard error
Fig. 4The t-values of the structural path relationships and the correlations of the independent latent variables. The values in red are not significant
Standardized parameter estimates of the structural equation model (Eq. 1, 2, 3 and 4)
| Paths | Parameter | Std. Coeff. | Std. Error |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PERSONAL → ANTENAT |
| −0.004 | 0 · 002 | −2.33* |
| COMMUN → ANTENAT |
| 0.08 | 0.003 | 27.29*** |
| SES → ANTENAT |
| 0.36 | 0 · 004 | 99.11*** |
| PERSONAL → DELIVERY |
| −0.03 | 0.001 | −20.61*** |
| COMMUN → DELIVERY |
| −0.05 | 0.003 | −22.04*** |
| SES → DELIVERY |
| 0.35 | 0.003 | 112.39*** |
|
|
| 0.32 | 0.003 | 101.68*** |
| PERSONAL → POSTNAT |
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.91 |
| COMMUN → POSTNAT |
| 0.07 | 0.002 | 35.47*** |
| SES → POSTNAT |
| 0.02 | 0.003 | 6.83*** |
| BABY → POSTNAT |
| 0.02 | 0.002 | 10.32*** |
|
|
| −0.001 | 0.003 | −0.46 |
|
|
| 0.78 | 0.003 | 274.19*** |
| PERSONAL → VACCINAT |
| −0.01 | 0.001 | −8.01*** |
| COMMUN → VACCINAT |
| 0.13 | 0.003 | 50.92*** |
| SES → VACCINAT |
| 0.10 | 0.004 | 28.27*** |
| BABY → VACCINAT |
| −0.23 | 0.003 | −84.82*** |
|
|
| 0.36 | 0.004 | 94.91*** |
|
|
| 0.15 | 0.005 | 30.54*** |
|
|
| −0.02 | 0.005 | −4.64*** |
a The Full Information Maximum Likelihood estimation procedure took into account the missing at random (MAR) and missing completely at random (MCAR) data; Std. Coeff. standardized coefficient, Std. Error. standard error. The continuum of care for MNCH paths are in bold
*p < 0 · 05, ***p < 0 · 001 (two-tailed)
The covariance and correlation matrices of the latent constructs
| The latent variables covariance and correlation matrices | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covariance Matrix of all Latent Variables | ||||||||
| ANTENAT | DELIVERY | POSTNAT | VACCINAT | PERSONAL | COMMUN | SES | BABY | |
| ANTENAT | 0.98 | |||||||
| DELIVERY | 0.44 | 0.99 | ||||||
| POSTNAT | 0.36 | 0.79 | 1.02 | |||||
| VACCINAT | 0.46 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 0.99 | ||||
| PERSONAL | −0.06 | −0.10 | −0.08 | −0.08 | 1.00 | |||
| COMMUN | 0.09 | −0.02 | 0.05 | 0.17 | −0.01 | 1.00 | ||
| SES | 0.35 | 0.47 | 0.39 | 0.29 | −0.16 | 0.01 | 1.00 | |
| BABY | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 | −0.23 | 0.06 | −0.02 | 0.03 | 1.00 |
| Correlation (SD) Matrix of Independent Variables | ||||||||
| PERSONAL | COMMUN | SES | BABY | |||||
| PERSONAL | 1.00 | |||||||
| COMMUN | −0.01 (0.001)*** | 1.00 | ||||||
| SES | −0.16 (0.001)*** | 0.01 (0.001)* | 1.00 | |||||
| BABY | 0.06 (0.001)*** | −0.02 (0.00)*** | 0.03 (0.00)*** | |||||
*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 (two-tailed)