| Literature DB >> 32555935 |
Soraia Guerra Silvares1, Antonio Fernandes Moron2, Manuel de Jesus Simões3, Álvaro Ulhoa Cintra4, Edna Frasson de Souza Montero5, Edward Araujo Júnior6, José Luiz Martins7.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) in newborn rats submitted to hypoxia and reoxygenation (H/R) conditions in an experimental model of necrotizing enterocolitis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32555935 PMCID: PMC7292620 DOI: 10.1590/s0102-865020200040000001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Cir Bras ISSN: 0102-8650 Impact factor: 1.388
Figure 1Diagram of the division of the groups studied.
Figure 2Photomicrographs of ileum sections of newborns belonging to the various study groups (GI, GII, GIII, GIV and GV). Note in the ischemic groups whose mothers and / or fetuses received higher villi NAC (GIII, GIV and GV) and in the group that did not receive N-acetylcysteine sparse villi (GII). H.E. 50µm bar.
Number of intestinal villi in each group.
| Group I Control | Group II H/R | Group III H/R – RN NAC | Group IV H/R- RN/ M NAC | Group V H/R- M NAC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16.2 | 11.2 | 10.1 | 15.0 | 14.5 | |
| 15.1 | 10.3 | 12.3 | 12.1 | 12.7 | |
| 13.8 | 11.1 | 14.1 | 10.0 | 15.8 | |
| 14.1 | 12.1 | 10.3 | 11.1 | 14.2 | |
| 16.3 | 11.2 | 13.3 | 10.1 | 11.3 | |
| 15.7 | 11.1 | 12.2 | 16.5 | ||
| 16.1 | 14.2 | 13.1 | 14.8 | ||
| 15.5 | 13.1 | 12.2 | 16.7 | ||
| 12.2 | 11.1 | 15.4 | |||
| 10.1 | 13.1 | 16.7 | |||
| 11.1 | 12.1 | 17.8 | |||
| 13.1 | 10.2 | 18.9 | |||
| 13.4 | 16.5 | ||||
| 10.1 | 15.4 | ||||
| 12.2 | 16.3 | ||||
| 12.0 | |||||
| 12.1 | |||||
| 11.1 | |||||
| 10.1 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance: Calculated H = 34.84 (p<0.0001)
Post hoc test: Group I > Group II and Group III. Group IV = Group V
Height (µm) of the intestinal villi of newborns in each group.
| Group I Control | Group II H/R | Group III H/R – RN NAC | Group IV H/R- M e RN NAC | Group V H/R- M NAC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 333.55 | 190.1 | 233.12 | 224.40 | 315.70 | |
| 309.12 | 180.3 | 324.50 | 232.00 | 316.20 | |
| 320.39 | 195.4 | 312.60 | 111.00 | 317.80 | |
| 322.41 | 220.1 | 223.11 | 202.30 | 318.70 | |
| 321.11 | 190.1 | 243.21 | 201.00 | 314.20 | |
| 319.12 | 222.31 | 221.70 | 300.50 | ||
| 311.18 | 221.34 | 202.40 | 320.40 | ||
| 328.20 | 245.30 | 203.40 | 317.50 | ||
| 223.40 | 201.3 | 318.40 | |||
| 222.10 | 202.3 | 300.50 | |||
| 321.12 | 203.4 | 301.20 | |||
| 300.12 | 199.1 | 320.40 | |||
| 199.76 | 330.50 | ||||
| 189.12 | 340.20 | ||||
| 190.87 | 320.1 | ||||
| 301.43 | |||||
| 321.23 | |||||
| 212.21 | |||||
| 221.12 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance: Calculated H = 37.55 (p<0.0001)
Post hoc test: Group I > Group III > Group II. Group V > Group IV.
Width (µm) of the intestinal villi of each group.
| Group I Control | Group II H/R | Group III H/R –RN NAC | Group IV H/R- RN/ M NAC | Group V H/R- M NAC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.55 | 6.2 |
| 48.10 | 12.50 | |
| 19.60 | 5.3 | 52.31 | 50.20 | 11.40 | |
| 21.50 | 4.2 | 60.34 | 49.00 | 10.50 | |
| 22.30 | 4.5 | 62.34 | 47.10 | 11.20 | |
| 28.60 | 6.2 | 54.12 | 47.20 | 12.40 | |
| 23.20 | 87.12 | 48.10 | 13.50 | ||
| 19.10 | 57.14 | 51.00 | 12.40 | ||
| 16.20 | 62.34 | 52.00 | 11.50 | ||
| 61.12 | 53.10 | 10.50 | |||
| 60.35 | 55.10 | 12.40 | |||
| 54.34 | 52.00 | 11.50 | |||
| 84.56 | 44.50 | 12.60 | |||
| 67.89 | 11.70 | ||||
| 45.67 | 10.70 | ||||
| 56.71 | 11.70 | ||||
| 57.12 | |||||
| 67.12 | |||||
| 67.12 | |||||
| 66.34 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance: Calculated H = 52.85 (p<0.0001)
Post hoc test: Group III > Group I > Group II. Group IV > Group V
Number (%) of mitoses in the intestinal villi of each group.
| Group I Control | Group II H/R | Group III H/R –RN NAC | Group IV H/R- RN/ M NAC | Group V H/R- M NAC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1 | 3.7 |
| 1.0 | 1.3 | |
| 3.1 | 1.4 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 1.4 | |
| 1 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 1.5 | |
| 2.9 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 1.2 | |
| 2.1 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 1.1 | |
| 3.2 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.4 | ||
| 1.1 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 1.5 | ||
| 2.2 | 2.1 | 3.3 | 1.6 | ||
| 2.2 | 2.5 | 1.7 | |||
| 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.8 | |||
| 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.9 | |||
| 4.2 | 2.1 | 1.9 | |||
| 1.1 | 1.3 | ||||
| 1.2 | 1.4 | ||||
| 1.3 | 1.5 | ||||
| 1.5 | |||||
| 1.3 | |||||
| 1.1 | |||||
| 1.1 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance
Calculated H = 4.66 (P = 0.1979)
Not significant
Mortality rate in the study groups.
| Group I Control | Group II H/R | Group III H/R –RN NAC | Group IV H/R- RN/ M NAC | Group V H/R- M NAC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 8 | 10 |
| 12 | 19 |
| Deaths | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Survivors | 8 | 5 | 19 | 12 | 15 |
| % | 0 | 50 | 9.52 | 0 | 21.5 |