Literature DB >> 32554766

Goals-of-care decision aid for critically ill patients with TBI: Development and feasibility testing.

Susanne Muehlschlegel1, David Y Hwang2, Julie Flahive2, Thomas Quinn2, Christopher Lee2, Jesse Moskowitz2, Kelsey Goostrey2, Kelsey Jones2, Jolanta J Pach2, Andrea K Knies2, Lori Shutter2, Robert Goldberg2, Kathleen M Mazor2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and demonstrate early feasibility of a goals-of-care decision aid for surrogates of patients who are critically ill with traumatic brain injury (ciTBI) that meets accepted international decision aid guidelines.
METHODS: We developed the decision aid in 4 stages: (1) qualitative study of goals-of-care communication and decision needs of 36 stakeholders of ciTBI (surrogates and physicians), which informed (2) development of paper-based decision aid with iterative revisions after feedback from 52 stakeholders; (3) acceptability and usability testing in 18 neurologic intensive care unit (neuroICU) family members recruited from 2 neuroICU waiting rooms using validated scales; and (4) open-label, randomized controlled feasibility trial in surrogates of ciTBI. We performed an interim analysis of 16 surrogates of 12 consecutive patients who are ciTBI to confirm early feasibility of the study protocol and report recruitment, participation, and retention rates to date.
RESULTS: The resultant goals-of-care decision aid achieved excellent usability (median System Usability Scale 87.5 [possible range 0-100]) and acceptability (97% graded the tool's content as "good" or "excellent"). Early feasibility of the decision aid and the feasibility trial protocol was demonstrated by high rates of recruitment (73% consented), participation (100%), and retention (100% both after the goals-of-care clinician-family meeting and at 3 months) and complete data for the measurements of all secondary decision-related and behavioral outcomes to date.
CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic development process resulted in a novel goals-of-care decision aid for surrogates of patients who are ciTBI with excellent usability, acceptability, and early feasibility in the neuroICU environment, and meets international decision aid standards. This methodology may be a development model for other decision aids in neurology to promote shared decision-making.
© 2020 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32554766      PMCID: PMC7455326          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  34 in total

1.  Caution regarding the use of pilot studies to guide power calculations for study proposals.

Authors:  Helena Chmura Kraemer; Jim Mintz; Art Noda; Jared Tinklenberg; Jerome A Yesavage
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2006-05

Review 2.  Guidelines for Family-Centered Care in the Neonatal, Pediatric, and Adult ICU.

Authors:  Judy E Davidson; Rebecca A Aslakson; Ann C Long; Kathleen A Puntillo; Erin K Kross; Joanna Hart; Christopher E Cox; Hannah Wunsch; Mary A Wickline; Mark E Nunnally; Giora Netzer; Nancy Kentish-Barnes; Charles L Sprung; Christiane S Hartog; Maureen Coombs; Rik T Gerritsen; Ramona O Hopkins; Linda S Franck; Yoanna Skrobik; Alexander A Kon; Elizabeth A Scruth; Maurene A Harvey; Mithya Lewis-Newby; Douglas B White; Sandra M Swoboda; Colin R Cooke; Mitchell M Levy; Elie Azoulay; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Determination of neurologic prognosis and clinical decision making in adult patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a survey of Canadian intensivists, neurosurgeons, and neurologists.

Authors:  Alexis F Turgeon; François Lauzier; Karen E A Burns; Maureen O Meade; Damon C Scales; Ryan Zarychanski; Lynne Moore; David A Zygun; Lauralyn A McIntyre; Salmaan Kanji; Paul C Hébert; Valérie Murat; Giuseppe Pagliarello; Dean A Fergusson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  External Validation of the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury: Prognostic Models for Traumatic Brain Injury on the Study of the Neuroprotective Activity of Progesterone in Severe Traumatic Brain Injuries Trial.

Authors:  Hong Sun; Hester F Lingsma; Ewout W Steyerberg; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Surrogate decision-makers' perspectives on discussing prognosis in the face of uncertainty.

Authors:  Leah R Evans; Elizabeth A Boyd; Grace Malvar; Latifat Apatira; John M Luce; Bernard Lo; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Validation of a decision regret scale.

Authors:  Jamie C Brehaut; Annette M O'Connor; Timothy J Wood; Thomas F Hack; Laura Siminoff; Elisa Gordon; Deb Feldman-Stewart
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Peter A Ubel; Aleksandra Jankovic; Holly A Derry; Dylan M Smith
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Development and validation of a short-form, rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine.

Authors:  Ahsan M Arozullah; Paul R Yarnold; Charles L Bennett; Robert C Soltysik; Michael S Wolf; Rosario M Ferreira; Shoou-Yih D Lee; Stacey Costello; Adil Shakir; Caroline Denwood; Fred B Bryant; Terry Davis
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Development and usability testing of a Web-based decision aid for families of patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Christopher E Cox; Nicholas G Wysham; Brenda Walton; Derek Jones; Brian Cass; Maria Tobin; Mattias Jonsson; Jeremy M Kahn; Douglas B White; Catherine L Hough; Carmen L Lewis; Shannon S Carson
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 6.925

10.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Nino Mushkudiani; Pablo Perel; Isabella Butcher; Juan Lu; Gillian S McHugh; Gordon D Murray; Anthony Marmarou; Ian Roberts; J Dik F Habbema; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of a Goals-of-Care Decision Aid for Surrogates of Severe Acute Brain Injury Patients.

Authors:  Susanne Muehlschlegel; Kelsey Goostrey; Julie Flahive; Qiang Zhang; Jolanta J Pach; David Y Hwang
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 11.800

Review 2.  Neuroprognostication: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Brian L Edlow; Joseph T Giacino; David M Greer; David Fischer
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 44.711

3.  Adapting a Traumatic Brain Injury Goals-of-Care Decision Aid for Critically Ill Patients to Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Hemispheric Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Kelsey J Goostrey; Christopher Lee; Kelsey Jones; Thomas Quinn; Jesse Moskowitz; Jolanta J Pach; Andrea K Knies; Lori Shutter; Robert Goldberg; Kathleen M Mazor; David Y Hwang; Susanne Muehlschlegel
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2021-03-09

4.  The Experiences and Needs of Families of Comatose Patients After Cardiac Arrest and Severe Neurotrauma: The Perspectives of National Key Stakeholders During a National Institutes of Health-Funded Workshop.

Authors:  Susanne Muehlschlegel; Sarah M Perman; Jonathan Elmer; Adrianne Haggins; Natalie D Teixeira Bailey; Jennifer Huang; Liz Jansky; Jessica Kirchner; Renee Kasperek-Wynn; Paula Darby Lipman; Sharon D Yeatts; Michael D Fetters; Neal W Dickert; Robert Silbergleit
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-03-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.