Literature DB >> 18344440

Clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in assessing the neck after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for Locoregional advanced head and neck cancer.

Seng Chuan Ong1, Heiko Schöder, Nancy Y Lee, Snehal G Patel, Diane Carlson, Matthew Fury, David G Pfister, Jatin P Shah, Steven M Larson, Dennis H Kraus.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: For patients with locoregional advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), concurrent chemoradiotherapy is a widely accepted treatment, but the need for subsequent neck dissection remains controversial. We investigated the clinical utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in this setting.
METHODS: In this Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA)-compliant retrospective study, we reviewed the records of patients with HNSCC who were treated by concurrent chemoradiation therapy between March 2002 and December 2004. Patients with lymph node metastases who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT > or = 8 wk after the end of therapy were included. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings were validated by biopsy, histopathology of neck dissection specimens (n = 18), or clinical and imaging follow-up (median, 37 mo).
RESULTS: Sixty-five patients with a total of 84 heminecks could be evaluated. 18F-FDG PET/CT (visual analysis) detected residual nodal disease with a sensitivity of 71%, a specificity of 89%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 38%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97%, and an accuracy of 88%. Twenty-nine heminecks contained residual enlarged lymph nodes (diameter, > or =1.0 cm), but viable tumor was found in only 5 of them. 18F-FDG PET/CT was true-positive in 4 and false-positive in 6 heminecks, but the NPV was high at 94%. Fifty-five heminecks contained no residual enlarged nodes, and PET/CT was true-negative in 50 of these, yielding a specificity of 96% and an NPV of 98%. Lack of residual lymphadenopathy on CT had an NPV of 96%. Finally, normal 18F-FDG PET/CT excluded residual disease at the primary site with a specificity of 95%, an NPV of 97%, and an accuracy of 92%.
CONCLUSION: In patients with HNSCC, normal 18F-FDG PET/CT after chemoradiotherapy has a high NPV and specificity for excluding residual locoregional disease. In patients without residual lymphadenopathy, neck dissection may be withheld safely. In patients with residual lymphadenopathy, a lack of abnormal 18F-FDG uptake in these nodes also excludes viable tumor with high certainty, but confirmation of these data in a prospective study may be necessary before negative 18F-FDG PET/CT may become the only, or at least most-decisive, criterion in the management of the neck after chemoradiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18344440     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.044792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  65 in total

Review 1.  Biologic imaging of head and neck cancer: the present and the future.

Authors:  A Srinivasan; S Mohan; S K Mukherji
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  The role of FDG PET-CT in the therapeutic evaluation for HNSCC patients.

Authors:  Joji Kawabe; Shigeaki Higashiyama; Atsushi Yoshida; Kohei Kotani; Susumu Shiomi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Qualitative interpretation of PET scans using a Likert scale to assess neck node response to radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Johanna Sjövall; Ulrika Bitzén; Elisabeth Kjellén; Per Nilsson; Peter Wahlberg; Eva Brun
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yuko Suenaga; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Posttreatment Imaging in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer without Clinical Evidence of Recurrence: Should Surveillance Imaging Extend Beyond 6 Months?

Authors:  A Gore; K Baugnon; J Beitler; N F Saba; M R Patel; X Wu; B J Boyce; A H Aiken
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Predictive value of pre-therapy (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the outcome of (18)F-FDG PET-guided radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  M Picchio; M Kirienko; P Mapelli; I Dell'Oca; E Villa; F Gallivanone; L Gianolli; C Messa; I Castiglioni
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Opportunities and challenges facing biomarker development for personalized head and neck cancer treatment.

Authors:  Alexandra Lucs; Benjamin Saltman; Christine H Chung; Bettie M Steinberg; David L Schwartz
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  [Radiological normal anatomy of the larynx and pharynx and imaging techniques].

Authors:  S F Nemec; C R Krestan; I M Noebauer-Huhmann; M Formanek; J Frühwald; P Peloschek; F Kainberger; C Czerny
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tejpal Gupta; Zubin Master; Sadhana Kannan; Jai Prakash Agarwal; Sarbani Ghsoh-Laskar; Venkatesh Rangarajan; Vedang Murthy; Ashwini Budrukkar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Long-term regional control in the observed neck following definitive chemoradiation for node-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Anuj Goenka; Luc G T Morris; Shyam S Rao; Suzanne L Wolden; Richard J Wong; Dennis H Kraus; Nisha Ohri; Jeremy Setton; Benjamin H Lok; Nadeem Riaz; Borys R Mychalczak; Heiko Schoder; Ian Ganly; Jatin P Shah; David G Pfister; Michael J Zelefsky; Nancy Y Lee
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 7.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.