Literature DB >> 19718759

Impact of surveillance on survival after laryngeal cancer in the medicare population.

David O Francis1, Bevan Yueh, Ernest A Weymuller, Albert L Merati.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Routine surveillance is advocated to detect recurrent disease after treatment for laryngeal cancer. This aim of this study was to determine the 1- and 5-year postrecurrence mortality for laryngeal cancers and evaluate whether more intensive surveillance improved survival. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: Patients with recurrent cancers (1992-1999) were identified in a national cancer clinical database. Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the effect of surveillance on postrecurrence survival.
RESULTS: Of 2,121 recurrent cancers identified, 913 were laryngeal. Patients with laryngeal cancer recurrence had 27% (P = .001) and 22% (P = .007) better odds of 1- and 5-year survival than other sites. The 1- and 5-year postrecurrence survival rates for laryngeal cancer patients were 72.4% and 41.3%, respectively. Glottic cancer cases had the best postrecurrence life expectancy. Multivariate regression revealed that clinical surveillance intensity had no independent impact on their survival (P < .05). However, patients with recurrent glottic cancer seen in surveillance had 23% improved odds of survival (P = .037).
CONCLUSIONS: More frequent surveillance visits was not associated with a survival advantage in the overall population. Patients with glottic cancer had a postrecurrence survival advantage if seen during the surveillance period. Laryngeal cancer patients had better postrecurrence survival than other head and neck sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19718759     DOI: 10.1002/lary.20576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  9 in total

1.  Posttreatment Imaging in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer without Clinical Evidence of Recurrence: Should Surveillance Imaging Extend Beyond 6 Months?

Authors:  A Gore; K Baugnon; J Beitler; N F Saba; M R Patel; X Wu; B J Boyce; A H Aiken
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Does the frequency of routine follow-up after curative treatment for head-and-neck cancer affect survival?

Authors:  S F Hall; T Owen; R J Griffiths; K Brennan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  AHNS Series: Do you know your guidelines? Principles of treatment for locally advanced or unresectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Cory D Fulcher; Missak Haigentz; Thomas J Ow
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.147

4.  Disparities in adherence to head and neck cancer follow-up guidelines.

Authors:  Haley K Perlow; Stephen J Ramey; Vincent Cassidy; Deukwoo Kwon; Benjamin Farnia; Elizabeth Nicolli; Michael A Samuels; Laura Freedman; Nagy Elsayyad; Raphael Yechieli; Stuart E Samuels
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Sensitivity of Medicare Claims to Identify Cancer Recurrence in Elderly Colorectal and Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Angela Mariotto; Danielle Melbert; Deborah Schrag; Paul Doria-Rose; David Penson; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Variation in routine follow-up care after curative treatment for head-and-neck cancer: a population-based study in Ontario.

Authors:  K E Brennan; S F Hall; T E Owen; R J Griffiths; Y Peng
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 7.  Follow-Up of Head and Neck Cancer Survivors: Tipping the Balance of Intensity.

Authors:  Petr Szturz; Carl Van Laer; Christian Simon; Dirk Van Gestel; Jean Bourhis; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Factors Associated with Outcomes Following Salvage Surgery for Recurrent Laryngeal Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 50 Cases from a Single Center in Poland.

Authors:  Katarzyna Miśkiewicz-Orczyk; Wojciech Ścierski; Grażyna Lisowska; Natalia Zięba; Maciej Misiołek
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-09-18

Review 9.  Follow-up in Head and Neck Cancer: Do More Does It Mean Do Better? A Systematic Review and Our Proposal Based on Our Experience.

Authors:  Nerina Denaro; Marco Carlo Merlano; Elvio Grazioso Russi
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 3.372

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.