Literature DB >> 32551966

Improving Care Experiences for Patients and Caregivers at End of Life: A Systematic Review.

Denise D Quigley1, Sara G McCleskey2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: End-of-life care is increasing as the US population ages. Approaches to providing high-quality end-of-life care vary across setting, diseases, and populations. Several data collection tools measure patient and/or caregiver care experiences at end of life and can be used for quality improvement. Previous reviews examined palliative care improvements or available measures but none explicitly on improving care experiences. We reviewed literature on improving patient and/or caregiver end-of-life care experiences.
DESIGN: We searched U.S. English-language peer-reviewed and grey literature after 2000 on adult end-of-life care experiences. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for quantitative studies, Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research approach for qualitative studies, and Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews tool for the literature reviews.
SETTING: Palliative and hospice care. POPULATION: Full-text abstraction of 84 articles, identifying 16 articles. MEASURES: Patient and/or caregiver end-of-life care experiences (captured through administrative data or direct report).
RESULTS: Articles examined palliative care experiences across settings; none studied hospice care experiences. Patients and/or caregivers assessed overall care experiences, clinician-staff interactions, provider communication, respect and trust, timeliness of care, spiritual support, caregiver knowledge of care plans, or bereavement support. Efforts aimed at improving end-of-life care experiences are limited and show mixed results.
CONCLUSIONS: Literature on improving patient and/or caregiver end-of-life care experiences is emerging and focused on palliative care experiences. Evidence on improving hospice care experiences is lacking. Research on strategies for improving end-of-life care experiences should go beyond overall care experiences to include specific aspects of palliative and hospice care experiences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  end of life; hospice care; improving quality; palliative care; patient experience; patient satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32551966      PMCID: PMC8526304          DOI: 10.1177/1049909120931468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care        ISSN: 1049-9091            Impact factor:   2.500


  34 in total

1.  Family evaluation of hospice care: results from voluntary submission of data via website.

Authors:  Stephen R Connor; Joan Teno; Carol Spence; Neal Smith
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 2.  What can we learn from quality improvement research? A critical review of research methods.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Alexander; Larry R Hearld
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  Integrating palliative and critical care: evaluation of a quality-improvement intervention.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Patsy D Treece; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Lois Downey; Sarah E Shannon; Theresa Braungardt; Darrell Owens; Kenneth P Steinberg; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Advancing performance measurement in oncology: quality oncology practice initiative participation and quality outcomes.

Authors:  Francis X Campion; Leanne R Larson; Pamela J Kadlubek; Craig C Earle; Michael N Neuss
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  A novel method of optimizing patient- and family-centered care in the ICU.

Authors:  Steven R Allen; Jose Pascual; Niels Martin; Patrick Reilly; Gina Luckianow; Elizabeth Datner; Kimberly A Davis; Lewis J Kaplan
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.313

6.  Improving social work in intensive care unit palliative care: results of a quality improvement intervention.

Authors:  Andrew J McCormick; J Randall Curtis; Patti Stowell-Weiss; Carol Toms; Ruth Engelberg
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Effectiveness of a home-based palliative care program for end-of-life.

Authors:  Richard D Brumley; Susan Enguidanos; David A Cherin
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 9.  Use of CAHPS® patient experience survey data as part of a patient-centered medical home quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Denise D Quigley; Peter J Mendel; Zachary S Predmore; Alex Y Chen; Ron D Hays
Journal:  J Healthc Leadersh       Date:  2015-07-07

10.  AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.

Authors:  Beverley J Shea; Barnaby C Reeves; George Wells; Micere Thuku; Candyce Hamel; Julian Moran; David Moher; Peter Tugwell; Vivian Welch; Elizabeth Kristjansson; David A Henry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-09-21
View more
  1 in total

1.  Reliable and Valid Survey-Based Measures to Assess Quality of Care in Home-Based Serious Illness Programs.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Melissa A Bradley; Feifei Ye; Danielle Schlang; Maria DeYoreo; Paul D Cleary; Marc N Elliott; Cheryl K Montemayor; Martha Timmer; Anagha Tolpadi; Joan M Teno
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.947

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.