Literature DB >> 19176833

What can we learn from quality improvement research? A critical review of research methods.

Jeffrey A Alexander1, Larry R Hearld.   

Abstract

This article presents a systematic review of the research methods used to study quality improvement (QI) effectiveness in health care organizations. The review relied on existing literature as well as emergent themes to identify types of QI programs (e.g., data/feedback, information technology, staff education) and quality outcomes (e.g., mortality, morbidity, unnecessary variation). Studies were separated into four categories according to the type of organization in which the QI program was introduced: (a) hospital, (b) nursing home, (c) physician group, and (d) other health care organization. Results of the review indicate that most QI effectiveness research is conducted in hospital settings, is focused on multiple QI interventions, and utilizes process measures as outcomes. The review also yielded substantial variation with respect to the study designs used to examine QI effectiveness. The article concludes with a critique of these designs and suggestions for ways future research could address these shortcomings.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19176833     DOI: 10.1177/1077558708330424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  27 in total

1.  Harveian Oration 2018: Improving quality and safety in healthcare .

Authors:  Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.659

2.  Improving Care Experiences for Patients and Caregivers at End of Life: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Denise D Quigley; Sara G McCleskey
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  A new pathway for elective surgery to reduce cancellation rates.

Authors:  Einar Hovlid; Oddbjørn Bukve; Kjell Haug; Aslak Bjarne Aslaksen; Christian von Plessen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Measuring team factors thought to influence the success of quality improvement in primary care: a systematic review of instruments.

Authors:  Sue E Brennan; Marije Bosch; Heather Buchan; Sally E Green
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Reliability of 95% confidence interval revealed by expected quality-of-life scores: an example of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after radiotherapy using EORTC QLQ-C 30.

Authors:  Tsair-Wei Chien; Shun-Jin Lin; Wen-Chung Wang; Henry W C Leung; Wen-Pin Lai; Agnes L F Chan
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Identifying quality improvement intervention publications--a comparison of electronic search strategies.

Authors:  Susanne Hempel; Lisa V Rubenstein; Roberta M Shanman; Robbie Foy; Su Golder; Marjorie Danz; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 7.  Characteristics of Quality Improvement Champions in Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review With Implications for Evidence-Based Practice.

Authors:  Kyungmi Woo; Gvira Milworm; Dawn Dowding
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Sustainability of healthcare improvement: what can we learn from learning theory?

Authors:  Einar Hovlid; Oddbjørn Bukve; Kjell Haug; Aslak Bjarne Aslaksen; Christian von Plessen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 9.  Measuring organizational and individual factors thought to influence the success of quality improvement in primary care: a systematic review of instruments.

Authors:  Sue E Brennan; Marije Bosch; Heather Buchan; Sally E Green
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Quality improvement needed in quality improvement randomised trials: systematic review of interventions to improve care in diabetes.

Authors:  Noah M Ivers; Andrea C Tricco; Monica Taljaard; Ilana Halperin; Lucy Turner; David Moher; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.