Literature DB >> 32546628

Reply to Pek et al.: Science is not the signal detection problem it is ordinarily thought to be.

Brent M Wilson1, Christine R Harris2, John T Wixted1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID： 32546628      PMCID： PMC7306793          DOI： 10.1073/pnas.2007624117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN： 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  A sensible formulation of the significance test.

Authors:  L V Jones; J W Tukey
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2000-12

2.  The forgotten history of signal detection theory.

Authors:  John T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 3.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.

Authors:  Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Signal detection continues to be part of science.

Authors:  Jolynn Pek; Duane T Wegener; Gary H McClelland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Science is not a signal detection problem.

Authors:  Brent M Wilson; Christine R Harris; John T Wixted
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.