Literature DB >> 31246058

The forgotten history of signal detection theory.

John T Wixted1.   

Abstract

Signal detection theory is one of psychology's most well-known and influential theoretical frameworks. However, the conceptual hurdles that had to be overcome before the theory could finally emerge in its modern form in the early 1950s seem to have been largely forgotten. Here, I trace the origins of signal detection theory, beginning with Fechner's (1860/1966) Elements of Psychophysics. Over and above the Gaussian-based mathematical framework conceived by Fechner in 1860, nearly a century would pass before psychophysicists finally realized in 1953 that the distribution of sensations generated by neural noise falls above, not below, the threshold of conscious awareness. An extensive body of single-unit recording and neuroimaging research conducted since then supports the idea that sensory noise yields genuinely felt conscious sensations even in the complete absence of stimulation. That hard-to-come-by insight in 1953 led immediately to the notion of a movable decision criterion and to the methodology of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Over the ensuing years, signal detection theory and ROC analysis have had an enormous impact on basic and applied science alike. Yet, in some quarters of our field, that fact appears to be virtually unknown. By tracing both its fascinating origins and its phenomenal impact, I hope to illustrate why no area of experimental psychology should ever be oblivious to signal detection theory. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31246058     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  12 in total

1.  Reply to Pek et al.: Science is not the signal detection problem it is ordinarily thought to be.

Authors:  Brent M Wilson; Christine R Harris; John T Wixted
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Science is not a signal detection problem.

Authors:  Brent M Wilson; Christine R Harris; John T Wixted
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Informal versus formal judgment of statistical models: The case of normality assumptions.

Authors:  Anthony J Bishara; Jiexiang Li; Christian Conley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-03

4.  Effects of shifts in response preferences on characteristics of representation and real-time processing: An application to the Hering illusion.

Authors:  Michael J Wenger; James T Townsend; Lisa A De Stefano; Yanjun Liu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Toward a more comprehensive modeling of sequential lineups.

Authors:  David Kellen; Ryan M McAdoo
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-07-22

6.  Putting perception into action with inverse optimal control for continuous psychophysics.

Authors:  Dominik Straub; Constantin A Rothkopf
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 7.  Theoretical false positive psychology.

Authors:  Brent M Wilson; Christine R Harris; John T Wixted
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-05-02

8.  d[Formula: see text]: Sensitivity at the optimal criterion location.

Authors:  Harinder Aujla
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-09-01

9.  The conditional approach to evaluating detection performance.

Authors:  Wolf Schwarz
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 2.157

10.  A Generative View of Rationality and Growing Awareness.

Authors:  Teppo Felin; Jan Koenderink
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.